BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                 SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 2678 (Gray) - State-designated fairs:  funding
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: May 31, 2016           |Policy Vote: GOV. & F. 5 - 0    |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 1, 2016    |Consultant: Robert Ingenito     |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          


          Bill  
          Summary: AB 2678 would temporarily require (1) retailers at  
          specified fairs to segregate revenue from sales, and (2) that 30  
          percent of the General Fund portion of this revenue be allocated  
          for specified fair projects. 


          Fiscal Impact:



                 The Board of Equalization (BOE) indicates that this bill  
               would result in an annual General Fund revenue loss of  
               $16.7 million. BOE's administrative costs would be  
               reimbursed. 

                 The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA)  
               would incur costs to administer the additional funds and to  







          AB 2678 (Gray)                                         Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
               perform auditing functions to ensure compliance with the  
               bill's working condition requirements. The magnitude of  
               these costs is unknown, but potentially in the hundreds of  
               thousands of dollars annually. 



          Background: Except where a specific exemption or exclusion is provided,  
          current law imposes the sales and use tax (SUT) on all retailers  
          for the privilege of selling tangible personal property (TPP) at  
          retail in California, or on the storage, use, or other  
          consumption in this state of TPP purchased from a retailer. 
          After the State collects SUT revenue ($48 billion in 2013-14),  
          it allocates the money to various state and local funds. Roughly  
          half-collected from an approximately 3.9 percent rate-goes to  
          the General Fund and can be spent on any state program, such as  
          education, health care, and criminal justice. Another 1.25  
          percent, known as the Bradley-Burns rate, goes to cities and  
          counties for general purposes. Three sales tax funds have  
          uniform state rates and support specified programs-an  
          approximately 1.1 percent rate for 2011 realignment  
          (county-administered criminal justice, mental health, and social  
          service programs); a 0.5 percent rate for 1991 realignment  
          (county-administered health and social services programs); and a  
          0.5 percent rate for city and county public safety programs  
          pursuant to Proposition 172 (1993). Additionally, some local  
          governments levy optional local rates-known as Transactions and  
          Use Taxes (TUTs)-and a small portion of these funds are used for  
          general purposes. As of January 1, 2017, the average statewide  
          SUT rate will be 8.21 percent.


          State law fully exempts many items from SUT (such as  
          prescription drugs, food, electricity, and poultry litter),  
          while other items are exempted from the state sales tax, but not  
          the local share, such as farm equipment and machinery, diesel  
          fuel used for farming and food processing, teleproduction and  
          postproduction equipment, timber harvesting equipment and  
          machinery, and racehorse breeding stock. Partial SUT exemptions  
          are difficult for both retailers and the BOE, and complicate  
          return preparation and processing. Moreover, errors attributable  
          to these partial exemptions occur frequently, resulting in  
          additional return processing workload for BOE.









          AB 2678 (Gray)                                         Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          



          Proposed Law:  
          This bill would, until January 1, 2022, require taxpayers to  
          segregate on their SUT return their sales and purchases of TPP  
          when the place of sale or use is on or within a state designated  
          fair (as specified) or any real property of a state designated  
          fair that is leased to another party; fairs in Los Angeles  
          County are excluded from the requirement.
          Additionally, the bill would require that 30 percent of the  
          General Fund portion of SUT revenues (or 1.18 percentage  
          points), less refunds and BOE's administrative costs, derived  
          from those segregated SUT revenues be deposited into the Fair  
          and Exposition Fund and continuously appropriated for  
          fair-related purposes, including the following: 


                 Capital outlay to California fairs for fair projects  
               involving public health and safety.


                 Fair projects involving major and deferred maintenance.


                 Fair projects necessary due to any emergency.


                 Projects that are required by physical changes to the  
               fair site. 


                 Projects that are required to protect the fair property  
               or installation, such as fencing and flood protection. 


                 For the acquisition or improvement of any property or  
               facility that will serve to enhance the operation of the  
               fair.













          AB 2678 (Gray)                                         Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          The bill would allow CDFA to allocate an unspecified portion of  
          the funds subject to California fairs (excluding those in Los  
          Angeles County) for general operational support, and  
          additionally limits allocation of funds to state-designated  
          fairs unless nonmanagement employees at that state-designated  
          fair, or nonmanagement employees at any real property of that  
          state-designated fair that is leased to another party, have the  
          following working conditions:


                 The employee receives a meal period of not less than 30  
               minutes for a work period of more than five hours per day,  
               unless the work period per day of the employee is less than  
               six hours and the meal period is waived by mutual consent  
               of both the employer and the employee.


                 The employee receives a second meal period of not less  
               than 30 minutes for a work period of more than 10 hours per  
               day, unless the work period per day of the employee is less  
               than 12 hours, the second meal period is waived by mutual  
               consent of both the employer and the employee, and the  
               first meal period was not waived.


                 Any work in excess of eight hours in one workday, any  
               work in excess of 40 hours in any one workweek, and the  
               first eight hours worked on the seventh day of work in any  
               one workweek is compensated at the rate of no less than one  
               and one-half times the regular rate of pay for an employee.


                 Any work in excess of 12 hours in one day is compensated  
               at the rate of no less than twice the regular rate of pay  
               for an employee.


                 Any work in excess of eight hours on any seventh day of  
               a workweek is compensated at the rate of no less than twice  
               the regular rate of pay for an employee.












          AB 2678 (Gray)                                         Page 4 of  
          ?
          
          
          Staff  
          Comments: According to CDFA, there are 78 fairs in California:  
          the California Exposition and State Fair, 52 district  
          agricultural association fairs, 23 county fairs, and 2 citrus  
          fruit fairs. As noted previously, the measure would not apply to  
          fairs in Los Angeles, which houses the Los Angeles County Fair  
          held in the City of Pomona, and three smaller fairs in the  
          cities of Industry, San Fernando, and Antelope. Staff notes the  
          revenue impact on this bill would depend on (1) annual fair  
          attendance, (2) taxable sales, which in turn would depend on  
          future economic conditions. Consequently, BOE's revenue loss  
          estimate of nearly $17 million is subject to volatility.


          Recommended  
          Amendments: Staff recommends deleting the continuous  
          appropriation authority from the bill, as it limits Legislative  
          discretion.





                                      -- END --