BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2691 Page A GOVERNOR'S VETO AB 2691 (Holden) As Enrolled August 29, 2016 2/3 -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |75-0 |(May 2, 2016) |SENATE: |37-0 |(August 15, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |78-0 |(August 22, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: REV. & TAX. SUMMARY: Authorizes a county board of supervisors to adopt a resolution or ordinance allowing certain taxpayers to pay their AB 2691 Page B property tax in monthly installments. The Senate amendments: 1)Allow the ordinance or resolution to set forth specific procedures for the tax collector to deem as timely monthly installments paid late but within a specified grace period for purposes of determining delinquency and default. 2)Require the monthly property tax payment to be allocated among the county, cities, special districts, and school entities in proportion to the amounts of property tax revenue otherwise allocated. 3)Define "school entities" as having the same meaning as Revenue & Taxation Code Section 95(f). 4)Provide that this bill does not apply to property for which an escrow account is established. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides that all property is taxable, unless otherwise provided by the California Constitution or federal laws (California Constitution Article XIII, Section 1(a)). Limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property (California Constitution Article XIII A, Section 1(a) (Proposition 13 of 1978)). 2)Requires an annual payment of property tax and provides that unpaid taxes become delinquent and subject to penalties and AB 2691 Page C costs. 3)Specifies that half of the property tax on real property is due and payable November 1, and the second half is due and payable on February 1. 4)Provides that the entire tax on real property may be paid when the first installment is due and payable or at any time thereafter until the properties on the current roll become tax defaulted. The second installment may be paid separately only if the first installment has been paid. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill: 1)Authorized a county board of supervisors to adopt a resolution or ordinance to implement a Monthly Property Tax Payment Program to allow a qualified taxpayer to pay the ad valorem property tax owed on the qualified taxpayer's principal residence in monthly installments. 2)Defined a "qualified taxpayer" as a taxpayer who is any or both of the following: a) A person who is 62 years of age or older. b) A person receiving supplemental security income for a disability, regardless of age. FISCAL EFFECT: None AB 2691 Page D COMMENTS: 1)Proposition 13. Much of the law pertaining to property taxation is prescribed by Articles XIII and XIII A (commonly known as "Proposition 13") of the California Constitution. Proposition 13 was added to the California Constitution in June 1978 and was most recently amended by Proposition 26 in 2010. Proposition 13 was designed to provide real property tax relief by imposing a set of interlocking limitations upon the assessment and taxing powers of state and local governments.<1> California Constitution Article XIII A, Section 1, states that, as a general rule, the maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property may not exceed 1% of the property's full cash value, as adjusted for the lesser of inflation or 2% per year. The term "full cash value" is defined as the "county assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-1976 tax bill" or thereafter "the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment" (California Constitution Article XIII A, Sections 1 and 2). 2)Property Tax Payments: Due Dates. Generally, property taxes on the secured roll are due in two installments: on November 1 and February 1. Property taxes that are due but unpaid after December 10 or April 10 become delinquent and incur a 10% penalty per installment. After April 10, the taxpayer is --------------------------- <1> Since any tax savings resulting from the real property tax limitations provided in California Constitution Article XIII A, Sections 1 and 2 could be effectively eliminated through the imposition of additional state and local taxes, Sections 3 and 4 place additional restrictions upon the imposition of any such taxes. See Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization, (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208. AB 2691 Page E also charged a $10 fee for preparation of his/her delinquent tax records. If there are any unpaid taxes after June 30, then the property taxes are declared to be in default and incur additional penalties at the rate of 1.5% per month of the unpaid taxes (18% per year), as well as a $15 redemption fee. 3)Is There a Problem? According to this bill's author, many seniors, particularly those on fixed incomes, have trouble saving up for a large expenditure such as an annual property tax bill. While California is among the states with the lowest property tax rates, a large number of seniors who are homeowners still struggle to make ends meet during retirement. The Economic Policy Institute has described the status of these seniors as "economically vulnerable". Nearly one-half of the elderly population in the United States, or 48%, falls within this category. 4)Proposed Solution: Monthly Property Tax Program. This bill proposes to authorize a county board of supervisors to create a Monthly Property Tax Payment program for seniors and disabled individuals, regardless of age. In essence, the program would allow those property owners to pay their property tax bill in monthly installments instead of bi-annual payments. Property for which an escrow account is established would not qualify for the program. 5)Implementation Issues. County tax collectors currently send only two bills per year, one for each installment, so administering a monthly payment system would increase printing, mailing, and banking costs. Information technology may also need to be reprogrammed as most of the state's tax collectors use the same collections software built around the two-installment system, which does not currently allow for monthly payments. Because this bill allows, but does not require, counties to allow monthly payments, this bill does AB 2691 Page F not obligate the state to pay these costs; instead, tax collectors would have to ask their boards of supervisors for funding to implement the program. GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE: I am returning Assembly Bill 2691 without my signature. This bill authorizes a county board of supervisors to let qualified taxpayers pay their property taxes in monthly, rather than biannual, payments. County supervisors, tax collectors, and auditors across the state oppose this measure due to the significant costs to upgrade tax collection systems. I am not convinced that changing these current systems, many of which have been in place for decades, is worth the cost. Analysis Prepared by: Irene Ho / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098 FN: 0005069