AB 2698, as amended, Weber. School accountability: school climate and restorative justice: assessments.
(1) Existing law establishes the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 to, among other things, ensure that each child in California receives a high-quality education consistent with all statewide content and performance standards, as specified.
This bill would requirebegin delete high-needend deletebegin insert low-achievingend insert schools, as defined, on or before September 1, 2017, to begin and, on or before July 1, 2018, to complete a school climate assessment, as specified. The bill would require every assessed school to take steps to ensure that responses to school climate assessments remain anonymous and that no individual is identified. The bill would require
these schools to publish the results of the assessment on their Internet Web sites, provided that personally identifiable information or information that can reasonably lead a reader to identify an individual is not shared. The bill would require the outcomes resulting from a school climate assessment to be shared through meaningful engagement and collaboration with pupils, parents, teachers, and school personnelbegin insert in orderend insert to develop corrective action recommendationsbegin delete that address the assessment outcomesend delete and would require the recommendations to be incorporated and implemented by the school district no later than one year after completion of the assessment, except as provided. By imposing additional duties on school officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require the State Department of Education to develop and post to an easily accessible page on the department’s Internet Web site a listing of available school climate assessment instruments and organizations. The bill would require the department to convene an advisory committee comprised of stakeholders and professionals who have participated in the development and expansion of alternative discipline programs, such as restorative justice and positive behavioral interventions and supports, to make recommendations to the department. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office, on or before January 1, 2023, to compile data of the changes in pupil academic achievement at targetedbegin delete high-needend deletebegin insert low-achievingend insert schools, including a breakdown by pupil ethnicity, and
chronic absenteeism, suspension, expulsion, and dropout rates of the targeted schools and provide a report to the department, the Governor, and the appropriate legislative budget and policy committees, as specified.
The bill would repeal these provisions on July 1, 2023.
(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to improve
2pupil academic outcomes atbegin delete high-need,end delete low-achieving schools by
3improving school climates to provide a strong foundation for
4academic improvement efforts.
P3 1(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following
2relating to school climate:
3(1) A school’s climate is a social justice issue, as the state loses
4generations of pupils from poor and underserved communities
5with few options but to enroll in high-need, low-achieving schools.
6(2) Over 20 years of research has confirmed that a positive
7school climate is directly related to pupil academic achievement
8and that school climate is the single most dominant predictor we
9now have of pupil academic achievement levels.
10(3) The United States Department of Education recommends
11school climate reform as an evidence-based strategy to prevent
12school violence.
13(4) The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
14recommends school climate reform as a scientifically sound
15strategy that promotes healthy relationships, school connectedness,
16and pupil retention.
17(5) The federal Institute of Education Sciences includes school
18climate as a
strategy for dropout prevention.
19(6) Perceptions about school climate impact teacher morale and
20pupil achievement. A positive school climate benefits pupils,
21teachers, school administrators, school personnel, and parents;
22teachers are motivated to teach and pupils are motivated to learn.
23(7) Without school climate assessments, teachers and education
24leaders lack a comprehensive understanding of the tools and steps
25needed to address low pupil achievement levels, pupil dropout
26rates, pupil suspensions, and pupil chronic absenteeism.
27(8) The use of school climate assessments is an effective
28data-driven strategy that engages pupils, teachers, school
29administrators, school personnel, and parents working together to
30create safe,
supportive, engaging, and successful schools.
31(9) Positive school climates are stable over time absent any
32systematic effort to change climate components.
33(10) The meaningful input and perspectives of pupils, commonly
34absent in school decisionmaking, are essential components of
35school climate assessments to improve pupil emotional and social
36well-being.
37(11) No instances of successful turnaround schools, which are
38schools that transformed from high-need, low-achieving schools
39into high-performing schools, have been found that did not address
40school climate.
P4 1(12) Factors affecting a school’s climate that recognize the
2social, emotional, and academic
aspects of K-12 pupil learning
3can be accurately measured and assessed.
4
(c) The Legislature finds and declares that creating a
5sustainable, positive school climate fosters youth development;
6higher pupil achievement; lower dropout, suspension, and
7absenteeism rates; decreased incidences of violence; and increased
8teacher retention and results in the following outcomes that directly
9impact K-12 pupils, teachers, school administrators, school
10personnel, and parents:
11
(1) Pupils, teachers, school administrators, school personnel,
12and parents are engaged and respected.
13
(2) Individuals feel socially, emotionally, and physically safe
14and relationships with and among youth are prioritized.
15
(3) Pupils, teachers, school administrators, school personnel,
16and parents work together to develop and contribute to a shared
17school vision.
18
(4) Teachers and school administrators, incorporating the views
19of pupils, model and nurture attitudes that emphasize the benefits
20and satisfaction gained from learning based on high academic
21expectations.
22
(5) Each individual contributes to the operations and climate
23of the school.
24
(6) Disciplinary practices are assessed and an effort is made
25to utilize practices that promote positive interventions.
26
(7) Collaboration and cooperation replace a school climate of
27confrontation and mistrust, and inclusiveness becomes the norm.
28(c)
end delete
29begin insert(d)end insert The Legislature finds and declares all of the following
30regarding alternative discipline programs, such as restorative justice
31and positive behavioral interventions and supports:
32(1) California K-12 schools issued more than half a million
33suspensions in the 2013-14 school year, with pupils of color
34disproportionately subjected to out-of-school suspensions.
35(2) African American pupils are three times more likely to be
36suspended than all other pupils, and studies show that pupils of
37color are disciplined more harshly than other pupils, resulting in
38serious, negative educational consequences.
39(3) A recent University of California, Los Angeles study
40concluded that African American pupils who are expelled from
P5 1school have a 90-percent likelihood of being placed in a state
2correctional institution.
3(4) Exclusionary school removals cause a number of correlated
4negative educational, economic, and social problems, including
5school avoidance, an increased likelihood of dropping out, and
6engagement with the juvenile justice system. This civil rights crisis
7has come to be known as the school-to-prison pipeline.
8(5) The American Academy of Pediatrics has found that
9suspension can increase stress and may predispose pupils to
10antisocial behavior and suicidal ideation.
11(6) Psychologists have found that
disciplinary exclusion can
12increase pupil shame, alienation, rejection, and the breaking of
13healthy adult bonds, thereby exacerbating negative mental health
14outcomes for young people.
15(7) Alternative discipline programs, such as restorative justice
16and positive behavioral interventions and supports, are healing
17practices that focus on repairing harm and preventing its recurrence.
18(8) Restorative practice, which builds upon restorative justice,
19is used to build a sense of school community and restore positive
20relationships through the use of restorative circles where pupils
21and teachers work together to set academic goals, develop
22classroom core values, and resolve conflicts.
23(9) A 2011-14 study prepared for the
United States Department
24for Education’s Office for Civil Rights on restorative justice in the
25Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) concluded that (A) the
26discipline gap between white and African American pupils
27decreased significantly for OUSD pupils who participated in
28restorative justice programs, but remained unchanged for pupils
29who did not participate in these programs, (B) that there was a
30128-percent increase in the reading levels of 9th grade pupils at
31OUSD schools with restorative justice programs, compared to an
3211-percent increase in schools without such programs, and (C)
33four-year graduation rates increased by 60 percent at OUSD
34restorative justice schools compared to 7 percent for nonrestorative
35justice schools.
36
(e) The Legislature finds and declares
that alternative discipline
37programs and practices foster all of the following:
38
(1) Positive relationships among pupils, teachers, school
39administrators, school personnel, and parents.
40
(2) A school community based on trust, respect, and inclusion.
P6 1
(3) A reduction in pupil disciplinary actions, expulsions,
2suspensions, and chronic absenteeism and the lowering of stress
3and antisocial behavior.
4
(4) Improved mental health and pupil academic outcomes.
Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 52080) is added
6to Part 28 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, to read:
7
This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the
12School Climate and Student Achievement Act.
(a) The Legislature finds that creating a sustainable,
14positive school climate fosters youth development; higher pupil
15achievement; lower dropout, suspension, and absenteeism rates;
16decreased incidences of violence; and increased teacher retention
17and results in the following outcomes
that directly impact K-12
18pupils, teachers, school administrators, school personnel, and
19parents:
20(1) Pupils, teachers, school administrators, school personnel,
21and parents are engaged and respected.
22(2) Individuals feel socially, emotionally, and physically safe
23and relationships with and among
youth are prioritized.
24(3) Pupils, teachers, school administrators, school personnel,
25and parents work together to develop and contribute to a shared
26school vision.
27(4) Teachers and school administrators, incorporating the views
28of pupils, model and nurture attitudes that emphasize the benefits
29and satisfaction gained from learning based on high academic
30expectations.
31(5) Each individual contributes to the operations and climate of
32the school.
33(6) Disciplinary practices are assessed and an effort is made to
34utilize practices that promote positive interventions.
35(7) Collaboration
and cooperation replace a school climate of
36confrontation and mistrust, and inclusiveness becomes the norm.
37(b) The Legislature finds that alternative discipline programs
38and practices foster all of the following:
39(1) Positive relationships among pupils,
teachers, school
40administrators, school personnel, and parents.
P7 1(2) A school community based on trust, respect, and inclusion.
2(3) A reduction in pupil disciplinary actions, expulsions,
3suspensions, and chronic absenteeism and the lowering of stress
4and antisocial behavior.
5(4) Improved mental health and pupil academic outcomes.
For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have
8the following meanings:
9(a) (1) “High-need schools,” as also defined by the federal
10Every Student Succeeds Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.), means
11a public elementary or secondary school that is located in an area
12in which the percentage of pupils from
families with incomes
13below the poverty line is 30 percent or more.
14
(a) (1) “Low-achieving school” means a school that is identified
15by the Superintendent or the state board as being in the lowest
16performing 5 percent of all schools and that is identified for
17comprehensive support and improvement pursuant to the
18accountability system requirements of the federal Elementary and
19Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6311), as
20amended by the federal Every Student Succeeds Act (Public Law
21114-95).
22(2) Abegin delete high-needend deletebegin insert low-achievingend insert
school could be a school operated
23by a school district, a school operated by a county office of
24education, or a charter school.
25(b) “School climate” means the quality, culture, and character
26of school life, based on the patterns of pupils’, teachers’, school
27personnel’s, and parents’ school life perceptions and experiences,
28and reflects a school’s norms, goals, values, expectations for
29behavior, interpersonal relationships, teaching and learning
30practices, safety, and organizational structures. School climate is
31a learning environment created through the interaction of personal
32relationships, physical setting, and psychological conditions.
33(c) “School climate assessment” means an evaluation of a
34school’s climate, as defined pursuant to subdivision (b), to
assess
35existing school culture and to provide information to influence
36pupil academic outcome improvements, and that incorporates the
37use ofbegin delete pupil, teacher, school administrator, school personnel, and begin insert school climateend insert surveys, interviews,
38parent individual and groupend delete
39school data analysis, and direct observations.
P8 1(d) “Alternative discipline programs, such as restorative justice
2and positive behavioral interventions and supports,” means a set
3of ethical principles and practices grounded in the values of
4showing respect, taking responsibility, and strengthening pupil
5relationships that prevent, respond to, and repair harmful pupil
6behaviors, enabling school
personnel to intervene more effectively
7by increasing pupil support without compromising accountability.
(a) On or before September 1, 2017,begin delete high-needend delete
10begin insert low-achievingend insert schools shall begin and, on or before July 1, 2018,
11complete a school climate assessment, consistent with the
12provisions of this chapter.
13(b) begin delete(1)end deletebegin delete end deleteEvery
assessed school shallbegin delete takeend deletebegin insert do all of the following:end insert
14begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTakeend insert steps to ensure that responses to school climate
15assessments remain anonymous and that no individual is identified.
16These schools shall publish the results of the assessment on their
17Internet Web sites, provided that personally identifiable information
18or information that can reasonably lead a reader to identify an
19individual shall not be shared.
20(2) begin deleteOutcomes end deletebegin insertShare
the outcomes end insertresulting from a school
21climate assessmentbegin delete shall be sharedend delete through meaningful engagement
22and collaboration with pupils, teachers, school personnel, and
23parentsbegin insert in orderend insert to develop corrective actionbegin delete recommendations
24
through school district local control and accountability plan
25committees that address the assessment outcomes.end delete
26
begin insert recommendations.end insert
27
(3) Share the outcomes and corrective action recommendations
28with the school district local control and accountability plan
29committees.
30(A)
end delete
31begin insert(c)end insert begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertThe recommendationsbegin insert shared pursuant to paragraph
32(3) of subdivision (b)end insert shall be incorporated and implemented by
33the school district no later than one year after completion of the
34assessment.
35(B)
end delete
36begin insert(2)end insert If the recommendations are not implemented within one
37year of the completion of the assessment, the governing board of
38the school district shall, within 60 days, hold a public meeting
39explaining its reasons for not executing corrective
actions.
(a) The department shall
develop and post to an easily
3accessible page on the department’s Internet Web site a listing of
4available school climate assessment instruments and organizations.
5(b) The department shall convene an advisory committee
6comprised of stakeholders and professionals who have participated
7in the development and expansion of alternative discipline
8programs, such as restorative justice and positive behavioral
9interventions and supports, to
make recommendations to the
10department that take into account the following:
11(1) Improving pupil social and emotional support and expanding
12trauma-informed practices and cultural competency in regions of
13the state with identifiedbegin delete high-needend deletebegin insert low-achievingend insert schools.
14(2) Collecting best practices of existing districtwide, countywide,
15and charterwide alternative discipline programs and ensuring these
16best practices are widely disseminated.
17(3) Developing a network of teachers who have effectively
18implemented these best practices and can provide
training to other
19schools and school districts, county offices of education, and
20charter schools.
21(4) Developing evaluation tools to measure the effectiveness of
22research-based alternative discipline strategies.
23(c) On or before January 1, 2023, the Legislative Analyst’s
24Office shall compile data of the changes in pupil academic
25achievement at targetedbegin delete high-needend deletebegin insert low-achievingend insert schools, including
26a breakdown by pupil ethnicity, and chronic absenteeism,
27suspension, expulsion, and dropout rates of the targeted schools
28and provide a report to the department, the Governor, and the
29appropriate legislative budget
and policy committees. The report
30shall alsobegin delete compile a list of best practicesend deletebegin insert include profiles of schools
31that implemented a school climate assessment and strategiesend insert used
32to accomplish improvements in academic
outcomes and a reduction
33in disciplinary actions.
This chapter shall remain in effect only until July 1,
362023, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
37that is enacted before July 1, 2023, deletes or extends that date.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
39this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
40local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
P10 1pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
24 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
96