AB 2714, as introduced, Cooper. Pest control: Pierce’s disease: funding.
Existing law establishes the Pierce’s Disease Control Program in the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Pierce’s Disease Management Account in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund.
This bill would appropriate an unspecified amount from the General Fund to the Pierce’s Disease Management Account in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund. The bill would also state various findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to, among other things, Pierce’s disease, the California wine industry, and funding the Pierce’s Disease Control Program.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) The California wine industry has an annual economic impact
4of more than sixty billion dollars ($60,000,000,000) on the state’s
P2 1economy and produces the number one finished agricultural
2product in the state.
3(b) The California wine industry creates more than 200,000
4jobs, billions in secondary economic activity, preserves agricultural
5land, open space, and family farms, is a major contributor to the
6economic vitality of the state, and provides for the overall
7enhancement of the California lifestyle.
8(c) However, California winegrape growing and wine
production
9are under attack by a number of pests and diseases, most of which
10are invasive to California, including the glassy-winged sharpshooter
11which is a vector of Pierce’s disease, grapevine leafroll disease,
12red blotch disease, mealybugs, brown marmorated stink bugs, and
13Virginia creeper leafhoppers.
14(d) Damage caused by these pests and diseases includes lost
15product, decreased production, lower crop yield, crop damage, and
16higher costs on growers generally, resulting in hundreds of millions
17in lost revenue annually.
18(e) Recognizing the importance of the California wine industry
19and the potential for widespread destruction from Pierce’s disease,
20the Legislature created a task force in 1999 that identified the need
21to create a statewide eradication and control program for Pierce’s
22disease and the glassy-winged sharpshooter, and in 2000 created
23the Pierce’s Disease Control
Program within the Department of
24Food and Agriculture and established a coordinating fund to
25support research and control efforts.
26(f) Additionally, the Legislature created the Pierce’s Disease
27and Glassy-winged Sharpshooter Board and later extended the
28authority of the board to designate other pests and diseases to
29qualify for research and outreach funding.
30(g) Historically, the Pierce’s Disease Control Program has been
31funded by federal, state, and industry sources, including an industry
32assessment fee, appropriations through the United States
33Department of Agriculture, and the General Fund.
34(h) From 1999 through 2011, the Pierce’s Disease Control
35Program was seen as a model for how state, federal, and industry
36funds could be used in collaboration to tackle issues important to
37agriculture.
38(i) For this 12-year period, the state contributed a total of
39$66,966,034, averaging nearly $5.6 million annually, with a
P3 1maximum contribution of $9.4 million in 2001-02, and a minimum
2$3.7 million contribution in 2009-10.
3(j) However, in 2011-12 the economic downturn forced the
4state to cease its investment in the Pierce’s Disease Control
5Program, and since this time, the program has been operating solely
6on industry and federal funds.
7(k) While the Pierce’s Disease Control Program is generating
8positive results without state funding, programs have been cut,
9and industry funding once used solely for research to develop
10long-term solutions is now being used to fund surveillance and
11control activities.
12(l) As a result, certain aspects of the program focused
on
13preventing the spread and establishment of the glassy-winged
14sharpshooter and the spread of Pierce’s disease have been
15diminished, undermining the program’s effectiveness.
16(m) Recent years have also seen dramatic increases in the
17introduction and spread of invasive pests and diseases affecting
18agriculture and communities, which many scientists attribute to
19the effects of climate change and the global transport of goods and
20people.
21(n) In light of increased threats and inadequate resources, the
22Pierce’s Disease Control Program and other pest and disease
23programs require additional funding to prevent movement and
24establishment of pests throughout California.
25(o) With an economic recovery well under way, now is the time
26to recommit state funding and support to combat Pierce’s disease
27and other pests and diseases that
affect winegrape production in
28the state.
The sum of ____ dollars ($____) is hereby appropriated
30from the General Fund to the Pierce’s Disease Management
31Account in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, which
32was created pursuant to Section 6046 of the Food and Agricultural
33Code.
O
99