Amended in Assembly April 12, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2714


Introduced by Assembly Member Cooper

begin delete

(Coauthor: Senator Wolk)

end delete
begin insert

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Mathis)

end insert
begin insert

(Coauthors: Senators Stone and Wolk)

end insert

February 19, 2016


An act relating to pest control, and making an appropriation therefor.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2714, as amended, Cooper. Pest control: Pierce’s disease: funding.

Existing law establishes the Pierce’s Disease Control Program in the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Pierce’s Disease Management Account in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund.

This bill would appropriatebegin delete an unspecified amountend deletebegin insert $5,000,000end insert from the General Fund to the Pierce’s Disease Management Account in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund. The bill would also state various findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to, among other things, Pierce’s disease, the California wine industry, and funding the Pierce’s Disease Control Program.

Vote: 23. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P1    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

P2    1(a) The California wine industry has an annual economic impact
2of more than sixty billion dollars ($60,000,000,000) on the state’s
3economy and produces the number one finished agricultural
4product in the state.

5(b) The California wine industry creates more thanbegin delete 200,000end delete
6begin insert 330,000end insert jobs, billions in secondary economic activity, preserves
7agricultural land, open space, and family farms, is a major
8contributor to the economic vitality of the state, and provides for
9the overall enhancement of the California lifestyle.

10(c) However, California winegrape growing and wine production
11are under attack by a number of pests and diseases, most of which
12are invasive to California, including the glassy-winged sharpshooter
13which is a vector of Pierce’s disease, grapevine leafroll disease,
14red blotch disease, mealybugs, brown marmorated stink bugs, and
15Virginia creeper leafhoppers.

16(d) Damage caused by these pests and diseases includes lost
17product, decreased production, lower crop yield, crop damage, and
18higher costs on growers generally, resulting in hundreds of millions
19in lost revenue annually.

20(e) Recognizing the importance of the California wine industry
21and the potential for widespread destruction from Pierce’s disease,
22the Legislature created a task force in 1999 that identified the need
23to create a statewide eradication and control program for Pierce’s
24disease and the glassy-winged sharpshooter, and in 2000 created
25the Pierce’s Disease Control Program within the Department of
26Food and Agriculture and established a coordinating fund to
27support research and control efforts.

28(f) Additionally, the Legislature created the Pierce’s Disease
29and Glassy-winged Sharpshooter Board and later extended the
30authority of the board to designate other pests and diseases to
31qualify for research and outreach funding.

32(g) Historically, the Pierce’s Disease Control Program has been
33funded by federal, state, and industry sources, including an industry
34assessment fee, appropriations through the United States
35Department of Agriculture, and the General Fund.

36(h) From 1999 through 2011, the Pierce’s Disease Control
37Program was seen as a model for how state, federal, and industry
38funds could be used in collaboration to tackle issues important to
39agriculture.

P3    1(i) For this 12-year period, the state contributed a total of
2$66,966,034, averaging nearly $5.6 million annually, with a
3maximum contribution of $9.4 million in 2001-02, and a minimum
4$3.7 million contribution in 2009-10.

5(j) However, in 2011-12 the economic downturn forced the
6state to cease its investment in the Pierce’s Disease Control
7Program, and since this time, the program has been operating solely
8on industry and federal funds.

9(k) While the Pierce’s Disease Control Program is generating
10positive results without state funding, programs have been cut,
11and industry funding once used solely for research to develop
12long-term solutions is now being used to fund surveillance and
13control activities.

14(l) As a result, certain aspects of the program focused on
15preventing the spread and establishment of the glassy-winged
16sharpshooter and the spread of Pierce’s disease have been
17diminished, undermining the program’s effectiveness.

18(m) Recent years have also seen dramatic increases in the
19introduction and spread of invasive pests and diseases affecting
20agriculture and communities, which many scientists attribute to
21the effects of climate change and the global transport of goods and
22people.

23(n) In light of increased threats and inadequate resources, the
24Pierce’s Disease Control Program and other pest and disease
25programs require additional funding to prevent movement and
26establishment of pests throughout California.

27(o) With an economic recovery well under way, now is the time
28to recommit state funding and support to combat Pierce’s disease
29and other pests and diseases that affect winegrape production in
30the state.

31

SEC. 2.  

The sum ofbegin delete ____end deletebegin insert five millionend insert dollarsbegin delete ($____)end delete
32begin insert ($5,000,000)end insert is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the
33Pierce’s Disease Management Account in the Department of Food
34and Agriculture Fund, which was created pursuant to Section 6046
35of the Food and Agricultural Code.



O

    98