BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2722


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2722 (Burke)


          As Amended  May 31, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Natural         |6-3  |Williams, Cristina    |Jones, Hadley,      |
          |Resources       |     |Garcia, Gomez,        |Harper              |
          |                |     |McCarty, Mark Stone,  |                    |
          |                |     |Wood                  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |14-6 |Gonzalez, Bloom,      |Bigelow, Chang,     |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,       |Gallagher, Jones,   |
          |                |     |Calderon, Daly,       |Obernolte, Wagner   |
          |                |     |Eggman, Eduardo       |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the Transformative Climate Communities  








                                                                    AB 2722


                                                                    Page  2





          Program (Program) in the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) to fund  
          the development and implementation of neighborhood-level  
          transformative climate community plans (plans).  Specifically,  
          this bill:  


          1)Establishes the Program to fund the development and  
            implementation of neighborhood-level transformative climate  
            community plans that include multiple, coordinated greenhouse  
            gas (GHG) emissions reduction projects that provide local  
            economic, environmental, and health benefits that are directly  
            connected to communities most impacted by pollution and  
            vulnerable to climate change.  States the intent of the  
            Legislature that private resources can "more effectively be  
            catalyzed to support innovative community and climate  
            transformation in disadvantaged communities."  


          2)Requires SGC, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary for  
            Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs at California  
            Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), to award competitive  
            grants to eligible entities, as specified.  


          3)Directs SGC to award grants for plans and projects that  
            implement plans that contribute to the reduction of GHG  
            emissions and demonstrate potential climate, economic,  
            workforce, health, and environmental benefits located in  
            communities that have a demonstrated need for climate,  
            economic, workforce, health, and environmental benefits.  


          4)Authorizes SGC to award a grant over multiple years. 


          5)Requires SGC to weigh economic, environmental, and health  
            benefits equally with climate benefits.  Defines "economic  
            benefits" as high-quality, well-paid employment opportunities  
            for residents, benefits for small businesses, and benefits for  








                                                                    AB 2722


                                                                    Page  3





            minority-, LGBT-, woman-, or disabled veteran-owned small  
            businesses in the plan's region.  Defines "LGBT" as lesbian,  
            gay, bisexual, or transgender.  


          6) Requires SGC to "endeavor to identify" additional public and  
            private sources of funding to sustain and expand the Program  
            and a network of technical assistance providers to assist in  
            plan development, implementation, and project financing. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill has the following state costs: 


          1)Cost pressures of up to $250 million (Greenhouse Gas Reduction  
            Fund (GGRF)) to fund the Program.


          2)Increased costs of $5 million for SGC to develop and implement  
            the program.  This figure is based on the Governor's proposed  
            budget which provides $100 million for an Administration  
            proposed Transformative Climate Communities Program (GGRF)


          3)Increased costs to the Air Resources Board (ARB) of less than  
            $150,000 (GGRF) if eligible projects fit within existing GGRF  
            project categories.  If eligible projects are outside current  
            existing GGRF project categories, ARB estimates increased  
            initial costs of approximately $670,000 for two years, and  
            ongoing annual costs of $520,000 (GGRF) to develop  
            quantification methodologies, disadvantaged community  
            criteria, reporting criteria, and expenditure records
          4)Minor, absorbable costs for CalEPA.


          COMMENTS:  The Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32 (Núñez),  
          Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006) requires ARB to adopt a statewide  
          GHG emissions limit equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020 and adopt  








                                                                    AB 2722


                                                                    Page  4





          regulations, including market-based compliance mechanisms, to  
          achieve maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG  
          emission reductions.  


          As part of the implementation of AB 32 market-based compliance  
          measures, ARB adopted a cap-and-trade program that caps the  
          allowable statewide emissions and provides for the auctioning of  
          emission credits, the proceeds of which are quarterly deposited  
          into the GGRF available for appropriation by the Legislature.  


          SB 535 (De León), Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012, requires no  
          less than 10% of cap-and-trade revenues fund projects located  
          within disadvantaged communities, and that 25% of available  
          revenues fund projects that benefit those communities. 


          The 2014-15 Budget Act allocated cap-and-trade revenues for the  
          2014-15 fiscal year and established a long-term plan for the  
          allocation of cap-and-trade revenues beginning in fiscal year  
          2015-16.  


          The Budget continuously appropriates 35% of cap-and-trade funds  
          for investments in transit, affordable housing, and sustainable  
          communities.  Twenty-five percent of the revenues are  
          continuously appropriated to continue the construction of  
          high-speed rail.  The remaining 40% are to be appropriated  
          annually by the Legislature for investments in programs that  
          include low-carbon transportation, energy efficiency and  
          renewable energy, and natural resources and waste diversion.  


          An expenditure plan for the 40% was not included in the 2015-16  
          Budget Act, with the exception of $227 million appropriated to  
          continue funding for specified existing programs.  The remaining  
          2015-16 revenues, along with 2016-17 revenues, totaling $3.1  
          billion are available for appropriation this year.  








                                                                    AB 2722


                                                                    Page  5







          According to the author, this bill is intended to establish a  
          new program to ensure that California is making "comprehensive,  
          cross-cutting, and transformative climate investments that  
          achieve multiple GHG, public health, and economic benefits in  
          our state's most vulnerable communities" to help cities, local  
          jurisdictions, and communities accelerate sustainability plans  
          and help California meet its ambitious climate change goals.  




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092  FN: 0003320