BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 2724 (Gatto) - Unmanned aircraft
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: August 2, 2016         |Policy Vote: T. & H. 7 - 2,     |
          |                                |          JUD. 5 - 2            |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 8, 2016    |Consultant: Mark McKenzie       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill does not meet the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.



          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 2724 would: (1) require a manufacturer of unmanned  
          aircraft (drones) to provide information about federal  
          regulations and registration requirements to purchasers of  
          drones; (2) require certain drones to be equipped with  
          geofencing technology that prevents operation in prohibited  
          areas, as specified; and (3) require drone owners to procure  
          adequate protection against liability, the amount of which would  
          be determined by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans).


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
           Unknown Caltrans costs, potentially in the range of $150,000  
            over several fiscal years, to the extent the department adopts  
            regulations to establish liability insurance requirements.  
            (State Highway Account or Aeronautics Account) ---see staff  







          AB 2724 (Gatto)                                        Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
            comments---


          Background:  Existing federal regulations require all commercial and  
          recreational drone owners to register unmanned piloted aircraft  
          with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  In 2012,  
          Congress passed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012  
          (Act).  The Act required the FAA to establish a framework for  
          safely integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national  
          airspace no later than September 30, 2015, and authorized the  
          FAA to establish interim requirements for the commercial  
          operation of drones.  Under the interim rules, drone operators  
          must meet certain standards and apply for a commercial use  
          exemption and an FAA Certificate of Authorization (COA) in order  
          to operate in in "navigable airspace," which is generally above  
          500 feet.  In addition, the Act also provides that certain small  
          drones (model, hobby, or recreational use aircraft) that are  
          operated away from airports and air traffic and near the ground  
          level are exempt from federal regulation, if they are flown for  
          exclusively recreational, non-commercial purposes.  The FAA has  
          proposed a framework of regulations for the operation of small  
          unmanned aircraft systems for non-recreational purposes.  The  
          proposed commercial regulations include a 55-pound weight  
          limitation, line-of-sight operation, a maximum airspeed of 100  
          mph, a ban on operation over any people, a maximum operating  
          altitude of 500 feet, and training and licensing for the  
          operator.  Final rules are expected to be adopted later this  
          year.
          Several local agencies, such as the City of Los Angeles and the  
          Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District, have  
          also established drone regulations within their jurisdictions.


          Existing state law establishes a Division of Aeronautics within  
          Caltrans to foster and promote safety in aeronautics and  
          establish only those regulations that are necessary so that  
          persons may engage in aeronautics with the least possible  
          restriction consistent with the safety and rights of others.   
          The Division of Aeronautics is primarily involved in the siting,  
          planning, and inspection of public-use airports in the state.












          AB 2724 (Gatto)                                        Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          Proposed Law:  
            AB 2724 would enact the Drone Registration Omnibus Negligence  
          Prevention Enhancement (DRONE) Act.  Specifically, this bill  
          would:
           Define "unmanned aircraft" as an aircraft that is operated  
            without the possibility of direct human intervention from  
            within or on the aircraft.
           Require manufacturers of drones for sale in California to  
            provide the following with the drone:
               o      A copy of the FAA safety regulations applicable to  
                 drones.
               o      A notification of registration requirements, if  
                 registration is required for the drone.
           Require a drone equipped with global positioning system (GPS)  
            capabilities to also be equipped with geofencing technological  
            capabilities that prohibit the drone from being operated in  
            any area prohibited by local, state, or federal law.
           Require drone owners to procure adequate protection against  
            liability, as specified.
           Require Caltrans to set the amount of liability protection  
            that is adequate.
           Specify that liability requirements would be operative on  
            January 1, 2020.
           Specify that the bill's requirements do not apply to drones  
            operated pursuant to a current commercial operator exemption  
            issued pursuant to federal regulations or FAA authorizations. 


          Related  
          Legislation:  SB 868 (Jackson) would enact the State Remote  
          Piloted Aircraft Act to establish a regulatory framework for the  
          operation of unmanned aircraft in this state, and authorize  
          Caltrans to adopt rules and regulations governing the conditions  
          under which drones may operate.  That bill failed passage in the  
          Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee this year. 


          Staff  
          Comments:  The bill was amended recently to require Caltrans to  
          establish the amount of liability protection that is adequate  
          for drone operators.  Caltrans does not currently possess staff  
          expertise in the area of liability insurance, and it is unclear  
          how Caltrans would determine what level of liability protection  
          is adequate for drone operation.  Staff estimates costs could be  








          AB 2724 (Gatto)                                        Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          minor for Caltrans to simply consult with other state entities  
          that may possess this expertise, such as the Department of  
          Insurance (DOI), or to potentially enter into an interagency  
          agreement with DOI to establish appropriate parameters for  
          establishing adequate liability protection.  To the extent  
          Caltrans determines that a regulatory process is required, staff  
          estimates that costs could be in the range of $50,000 to $75,000  
          per year over two years.


                                      -- END --