Amended in Assembly April 5, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2725


Introduced by Assembly Member Chiu

February 19, 2016


An act to add Sections 114094.6, 114094.7, 114094.8, and 114094.9 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to food safety.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2725, as amended, Chiu. Food manufacturers: food facilities: labels.

Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, provides for regulation by the State Department of Public Health of food manufacturers and retail food facilities and the preparation and sale of foods. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the code. A person who violates any provision of the code is guilty of a misdemeanor, except as otherwise provided.

This bill would, among other things, require the department to identify a list of ready-to-eat foods that have a high level of risk associated with consumption after a specified date and to post that list on its Internet Web site. The bill would, beginning July 1, 2017, require a food manufacturer or retail food facility that chooses to include a quality date, as defined, on foods for sale that are not identified on the department’s list to display that date using the phrase “best if used by” in 8-point type size or larger type, as specified. The bill would, beginning July 1, 2017, require abegin delete retail food facilityend deletebegin insert food manufacturerend insert thatbegin delete offers for sale a food on the department’s listend deletebegin insert elects to include an elevated risk date on products that require time/temperature control for safety (TCS)end insert to label the package or container of that food identifying the elevated-risk date, as defined, using the phrase “expiresbegin delete on.” The bill would require the department to adopt related regulations on or before July 1, 2017.end deletebegin insert on” or another term specified by the department. The bill would specify that it does not create a legal liability for a retail food provider to ensure that the manufacturer has properly labeled the productend insertbegin insert.end insert The bill would make related findings and declarations.

By creating new crimes and imposing additional enforcement duties on local health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) Food is the single most prevalent item in California’s waste
4stream, with over 5.5 million tons of food dumped in landfills
5every year in the state.

6(b) Four percent of the total energy budget, about 12 percent of
7the land, and 23 percent of all freshwater consumed in the United
8States is used to grow food that goes uneaten.

9(c) Discarded food is a drain on our economy, costing consumers
10and industry $162 billion each year nationally.

11(d) Reducing food losses by just 15 percent would be equivalent
12to enough food to feed more than 25 million Americans every
13year. According to estimates, more than 6 million Californians,
14including one in four children, suffer from food insecurity.

15(e) Dumping uneaten food and other organic waste into landfills
16releases more than 8.3 million tons of greenhouse gases each year
P3    1in California, contributing 20 percent of the state’s methane
2emissions.

3(f) Misinterpretation of the date labels on foods is a key factor
4leading to food waste in American households, and surveys show
5that 56 to 90 percent of consumers discard food prematurely as a
6result of misinterpreting food date labels.

7(g) It is the public policy of this state that consumers benefit
8from uniform and accurate expiration date labeling.

9

SEC. 2.  

Section 114094.6 is added to the Health and Safety
10Code
, to read:

11

114094.6.  

(a) If a food manufacturer or retail food facility
12chooses to include a quality date on foods not identified pursuant
13to subdivision (b) of Section 114094.7, the quality date shall be
14displayed in accordance with this section.

15(b) (1) On or before July 1, 2017, food for sale or offered for
16sale in the state that includes a quality date shall meet all of the
17following requirements:

18(A) The quality date shall be displayed with the uniform phrase
19“best if used by” unless and until the department specifies a
20different uniform term. The department shall have discretion to
21modify these guidelines, after consulting with stakeholders in an
22open public process.

23(B) begin deleteThe quality date and phrase shall be displayed in a single
24easy-to-read type style using upper and lower case letters in the
25standard form, in 8-point type size or larger, located in a
26conspicuous place on the food package. end delete
Thebegin insert qualityend insert date shall be
27expressed by the first three letters of the month followed by the
28numeral designating the appropriate calendar day and year or by
29expressing the calendar month numerically followed by a numeral
30designating the calendar day and a numeral designating the year.

31(2) The department may adopt regulations modifying these
32guidelines, after consulting with stakeholders in an open public
33process, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act
34(Chapter 3.5 (commending with Section 11340) of Part 1 of
35Division 3 of the Government Code).

36(c) For purposes of this article, “quality date” means the date
37indicated on the label affixed to the packaging or container of food,
38pursuant to subdivision (b), that communicates to consumers the
39date after which the food’s quality may begin to deteriorate.

P4    1(d) On and after July 1, 2017, a retail food facility shall not sell
2or offer for sale a food item that is not labeled in accordance with
3this section or Section 114094.7, as applicable.

4(e) (1) A retail food facility may donate a food item that is not
5labeled in accordance with this section.

6(2) This section does not prohibit, and shall not be construed to
7discourage, the sale, donation, or use of food after the food’s
8quality date has passed.

begin insert

9
(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a legal
10liability for a retail food provider to ensure that the manufacturer
11has properly labeled the product.

end insert
begin delete
12

SEC. 3.  

Section 114094.7 is added to the Health and Safety
13Code
, to read:

14

114094.7.  

(a) On and after July 1, 2017, a retail food facility
15that offers for sale any food identified by the department pursuant
16to subdivision (b) shall, at the time of sale to the consumer, cause
17the package or container of that food to be labeled in a manner
18that identifies the elevated-risk date, in accordance with the
19regulations adopted by the department pursuant to subdivision (c).

20(b) The department shall establish a list of ready-to-eat foods
21that have a high level of risk associated with consumption after a
22specified date, such as those classified by the United States Food
23and Drug Administration and the United States Department of
24Agriculture as “very high risk” or “high risk” for Listeria
25monocytogenes, and post that list on the department’s Internet
26Web site.

27(c) (1) On or before July 1, 2017, the department shall adopt
28regulations, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act
29(Chapter 3.5 (commending with Section 11340) of Part 1 of
30Division 3 of the Government Code), requiring that a retail food
31facility display the elevated-risk date with the uniform phrase
32“expires on” unless and until the department specifies a different
33uniform term.

34(2)  The department may adopt regulations modifying these
35guidelines, after consulting with stakeholders in an open public
36process, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

37(d) For purposes of this section, “elevated risk” means the date
38indicated on the label affixed to the packaging or container of food,
39pursuant to subdivision (a), after which there is a high level of risk
40associated with the consumption of the food product.

P5    1(e) On and after July 1, 2017, a retail food facility shall not sell
2or offer for sale a food item that is not labeled in accordance with
3this section or Section 114094.6, as applicable.

end delete
4begin insert

begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 114094.7 is added to the end insertbegin insertHealth and Safety
5Code
end insert
begin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert
6

begin insert114094.7.end insert  

(a) A food manufacturer may include an elevated
7risk date on products that require time/temperature control for
8safety (TCS), as defined by the United States Food and Drug
9Administration (FDA) Food Code, as published in 2013.

10
(b) (1) On and after July 1, 2017, food for sale or offered for
11sale in the state that includes an elevated risk date on the product
12shall meet both of the following requirements:

13
(A) The elevated risk date shall be displayed with the uniform
14phrase “expires on,” unless and until the department specifies a
15different uniform phrase.

16
(B) The date shall be expressed by the first three letters of the
17month, followed by the numerals designating the appropriate
18calendar day and year or by expressing the calendar month
19numerically followed by numerals designating the calendar day
20and year.

21
(2) The department may adopt regulations adding or exempting
22foods from the provisions of this section, after consulting with
23stakeholders in an open public process, in accordance with the
24Administrative Procedures Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with
25Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government
26Code).

27
(3) The department may modify the guidelines in this subdivision
28after consulting with stakeholders in an open public process.

29
(c) For purposes of this section, “elevated risk date” means the
30date indicated on the label affixed to the packaging or container
31after which there is a high level of risk associated with the
32consumption of the food product.

33
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a legal
34liability for the retail food provider to ensure that the manufacturer
35has properly labeled the food product.

end insert
36

SEC. 4.  

Section 114094.8 is added to the Health and Safety
37Code
, to read:

38

114094.8.  

On or before December 1, 2017, the department
39shall provide consumer guidance on the meaning of the quality
40date and safety date food labels.

P6    1

SEC. 5.  

Section 114094.9 is added to the Health and Safety
2Code
, to read:

3

114094.9.  

(a) A retail food facility shall not sell or offer for
4sale a food item that is labeled with a “sell-by” date, or any date
5in the labeling of food that is intended to communicate primarily
6to a distributor or retailer for purposes of stock rotation that is not
7a quality date or an elevated-risk date.

8(b) This section does not prohibit the use of sell-by dates that
9are presented in a coded format that is not easily readable by
10consumers.

begin insert

11
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a legal
12liability for the retail food provider to ensure that the manufacturer
13has properly labeled the product.

end insert
14

SEC. 6.  

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
15Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for certain
16costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district
17because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction,
18eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime
19or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the
20Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the
21meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
22Constitution.

23However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that
24this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement
25to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
26pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
274 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    98