BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2744|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 2744
Author: Gordon (D), et al.
Amended: 6/16/16 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE BUS., PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE: 6-0, 6/13/16
AYES: Hill, Block, Gaines, Galgiani, Mendoza, Wieckowski
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Hernandez, Jackson
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/12/16 (Consent) - See last page for
vote
SUBJECT: Healing arts: referrals
SOURCE: The Internet Association
DIGEST: This bill clarifies that certain types of advertising
do not constitute a referral when the third party advertiser
does not recommend, endorse, or otherwise select a healing arts
licensee, as specified.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1) Declares it unlawful for any person, association, or
corporation to establish, conduct or maintain a referral
AB 2744
Page 2
agency or to refer any person for remuneration to any
extended care, skilled nursing home or intermediate care
facility or a distinct part of a facility providing extended
care, skilled nursing home care, or intermediate care,
without first having obtained a written license from the
State Director of Health Services or from an inspection
service, as specified. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section
1400)
2) Defines "referral agency" for purposes of the HSC to mean a
private, profit or nonprofit agency engaged in the business
of referring persons for remuneration to any extended care,
skilled nursing home or intermediate care facility or a
distinct part of a facility providing extended care, skilled
nursing home care, or intermediate care. (HSC § 1401)
3) Declares unlawful, except as allowed for referral agencies
licensed under HSC, the offer, delivery, receipt, or
acceptance by any healing arts licensee of any rebate,
refund, commission, preference, patronage dividend, discount,
or other consideration, whether in the form of money or
otherwise, as compensation or inducement for referring
patients, clients, or customers to any person, irrespective
of any membership, proprietary interest, or coownership in or
with any person to whom these patients, clients, or customers
are referred. (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 650
(a))
4) States that the payment or receipt of consideration for
services other than the referral of patients which is based
on a percentage of gross revenue or similar type of
contractual arrangement shall not be unlawful if the
consideration is commensurate with the value of the services
furnished or with the fair rental value of any premises or
equipment leased or provided by the recipient to the payer.
(BPC § 650 (b))
5) Establishes parameters for group advertising and referral
services for dentists, chiropractors, and marriage and family
therapists, as specified. (BPC §§ 650.2, 650.3, 650.4)
6) Declares it unlawful for any healing arts licensee
disseminate or cause to be disseminated any form of public
communication containing a false, fraudulent, misleading, or
AB 2744
Page 3
deceptive statement, claim, or image for the purpose of or
likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the rendering of
professional services or furnishing of products in connection
with the professional practice or business for which he or
she is licensed. A "public communication" as used in this
section includes, but is not limited to, communication by
means of mail, television, radio, motion picture, newspaper,
book, list or directory of healing arts practitioners,
Internet, or other electronic communication. (BPC § 651(a))
7) Requires any price advertisement to be exact, without the use
of phrases, including, but not limited to, "as low as," "and
up," "lowest prices," or words or phrases of similar import.
Any advertisement that refers to services, or costs for
services, and that uses words of comparison shall be based on
verifiable data substantiating the comparison. Any person so
advertising shall be prepared to provide information
sufficient to establish the accuracy of that comparison.
Price advertising shall not be fraudulent, deceitful, or
misleading, including statements or advertisements of bait,
discount, premiums, gifts, or any statements of a similar
nature. In connection with price advertising, the price for
each product or service shall be clearly identifiable. The
price advertised for products shall include charges for any
related professional services, including dispensing and
fitting services, unless the advertisement specifically and
clearly indicates otherwise. (BPC § 651 (c))
8) Defines basic health care services as physician services,
including consultation and referral; hospital inpatient
services and ambulatory care services; diagnostic laboratory
and diagnostic and therapeutic radiologic services; home
health services; preventive health services; emergency health
care services, including ambulance and ambulance transport
services and out-of-area coverage; and hospice care. (HSC §
1345 (b))
This bill:
1) Clarifies that the payment or receipt of consideration for
advertising, wherein a licensee offers or sells services
through a third party advertiser, shall not constitute a
referral of patients when the third party advertiser does not
itself recommend, endorse, or otherwise select a licensee.
AB 2744
Page 4
2) Requires the purchaser to receive a refund of the full
purchase price, as determined by the terms of the advertising
service agreement between the third-party advertiser and the
licensee, if the licensee determines, after consultation with
the purchaser of the service, that the service is not
appropriate for the purchaser.
3) States that this bill shall not apply to basic health care
services, as specified, or essential health benefits, as
specified.
4) Requires the entity providing the advertising to be able to
demonstrate that the licensee consented in writing to the
requirements of this bill.
5) Requires a third party advertiser to make available to
prospective purchasers advertisements for services of all
licensees then advertising through the third party advertiser
in the applicable geographic region.
Background
According to the author's office, "AB 2744 would recognize that
online advertising involving the purchase of vouchers for
services offered by a healthcare professional is just another
form of advertising. Specifically, this bill would expressly
provide that payment or receipt of consideration for
advertising, wherein a healthcare professional offers or sells a
voucher for services, is not a referral of patients."
Current law authorizes and establishes parameters for healing
arts professionals to advertise their services and, in a
separate provision of law, prohibits rebates for patient
referrals. Current law does not appear to anticipate new forms
of advertising which offer prepaid services in the form of
vouchers. In this model, a healing arts licensee contracts with
a third party advertiser to establish a voucher for the
licensee's services at a certain price and for a certain time
period, which is then marketed by the advertiser. For each
voucher sold, the third party advertiser takes a portion of the
cost of the voucher as its advertising and marketing fee. The
third party advertiser is not paid upon redemption, nor does it
recommend, endorse, or otherwise select a licensee. Once a
AB 2744
Page 5
consumer purchases a voucher, the consumer contacts the licensee
to set an appointment, just as they would if responding to any
other form of advertisement.
Advertising vs. Referral. Critical to the inquiry as to the
legality of voucher advertising services is the issue of
"referral." A 1994 Attorney General opinion (93-807) stated the
following about the nature of referrals, in regards to a
question about whether a for-profit podiatry telephone referral
service may direct callers to podiatrists based on the amount a
participating podiatrist pays:
The referral plan about which inquiry is made [a dental
referral plan] fits squarely within the section's broad
prohibition. The verb `refer' is defined as `to send or
direct for treatment, aid, information, decision'
(Webster's Third New Internat. Dict. (1971 ed.) at p. 1907,
def. (2a)) and a `referral' as `the process of directing .
. . a patient . . . to an appropriate specialist or agency
for definitive treatment' (id., at p. 1908, def. (1b)). The
phrase `referral of patients' used in section 650 may thus
be thought of as the process whereby a third party
independent entity who initially has contact with a person
in need of health care first selects a professional to
render the same and then in turn places the prospective
patient in contact with that professional for the receipt
of treatment. In other words it is the selection of a
dentist to provide professional services for a patient by
someone other than the patient or dentist (or their
employees or agents on their behalf) that constitutes the
`referring of patients' under section 650. ? As we have
seen section 650 was designed to ensure that that selection
and subsequent reference would not be tainted by the
receipt of a fee and that the patient would not pay more
for the ultimate services he receives because of it. . . .
Inasmuch as in the process described herein consideration
is paid to obtain the advantage of being selected by the
referral service to be the treating professional, a
violation of section 650 occurs.
This bill specifies that a referral does not occur if a third
party advertiser does not itself recommend, endorse, or
otherwise select a licensee, and that the third party advertiser
makes available all licensees advertising within an applicable
AB 2744
Page 6
geographic region.
Also significant to the distinction between referral services
and advertising is the notion that consumers were being
intentionally or unintentionally misled about the nature of
referral services - that third party advertisers were screening
licensees and endorsing those recommended, or selected only
certain practitioners over others for quality reasons, rather
than because a licensee paid the service. To the extent that it
is obvious that the voucher is a solicitation and the third
party advertiser does not discriminate between licensees based
on advertising fees paid within a reasonable geographic region,
these forms of advertising should not trigger referral concerns.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
SUPPORT: (Verified8/2/16)
The Internet Association (source)
Groupon
OPPOSITION: (Verified8/2/16)
California Medical Association
California Society of Plastic Surgeons
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The Internet Association writes, "Current
law generally prohibits a licensed healing arts professional
from paying or receiving compensation for the referral of a
patient. This law was designed to prevent patient referrals
based on financial motives - which were frequently undisclosed -
rather than the patient's best interests. Internet advertising
is not a patient referral, any more than is traditional
advertising, such as an ad in the Yellow Pages or Penny Saver.
Nor does Internet advertising implicate the policy concerns
underlying California's prohibition on paid patient referrals."
AB 2744
Page 7
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The California Medical Association
(CMA) writes, "In the last decade, new companies often referred
to as 'daily deal sites' have been created that advertise
discounted services on behalf of another. The arrangement is
simply [that] a provider offers their services and a company
like Groupon or LivingSocial handles the advertising and selling
of those services. While this model is completely appropriate
for the vast amounts of market activity, it is not appropriate
to sell medical services in this manner. Physicians are
prohibited from providing any form of consideration in return
for the referral of patients. Because Groupon bases it business
model by tying its advertising fee to the total number of
services sold, CMA fears this model runs afoul of current fraud
and abuse protections centered around self-referral and
anti-kickback schemes."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/12/16
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,
Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Calderon,
Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper,
Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines,
Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson,
Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger
Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,
Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,
Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,
Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,
Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,
Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Burke, Jones-Sawyer
Prepared by:Sarah Huchel / B., P. & E.D. / (916) 651-4104
8/3/16 19:11:04
**** END ****
AB 2744
Page 8