BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2756 (Thurmond and Williams)


          As Amended  June 1, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                 |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+---------------------|
          |Natural         |7-2  |Williams, Cristina    |Jones, Harper        |
          |Resources       |     |Garcia, Gomez,        |                     |
          |                |     |Hadley, McCarty,      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |Mark Stone, Wood      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+---------------------|
          |Judiciary       |7-2  |Mark Stone, Alejo,    |Gallagher,           |
          |                |     |Chau, Chiu, Cristina  |Maienschein          |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden, Ting  |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |14-6 |Gonzalez, Bloom,      |Bigelow, Patterson,  |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,       |Gallagher, Jones,    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Daly,       |Obernolte, Wagner    |
          |                |     |Eggman, Eduardo       |                     |
          |                |     |Garcia,               |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |








                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Roger Hernández,      |                     |
          |                |     |Holden, Quirk,        |                     |
          |                |     |Santiago, Weber, Wood |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
          |                |     |                      |                     |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Enhances the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal  
          Resources' (DOGGR) penalty, shut-in order, and investigation  
          authority.  Authorizes DOGGR to permit environmentally  
          beneficial projects in lieu of up to 50% of the amount of a  
          civil penalty.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Specifies that, at the Supervisor's discretion, each day a  
            violation continues it may be treated as a separate violation.  
             Establishes different tiers of civil penalties including  
            minor and major violations.


          2)Authorizes DOGGR to permit environmentally beneficial projects  
            in lieu of up to 50% of the civil penalty amount.  Requires,  
            until January 1, 2021, civil penalties to be deposited into  
            the newly created Oil and Gas Environmental Remediation  
            Account rather than the Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Account.  


          3)Specifies when an emergency order for testing or remedial work  
            is set aside or modified on appeal, only the cost of work  
            performed is required to be refunded by DOGGR.  Prohibits  
            reimbursement for lost profits or increased production costs.


          4)Modifies requirements for appeals and for emergency orders  
            hearings. 


          5)Allows the Supervisor to impose a state tax lien against the  








                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  3





            real and personal property of the operator for civil penalties  
            assessed by DOGGR.


          6)Authorizes the Supervisor or Director to require an operator  
            to furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring  
            reports that the Supervisor or Director requires.


          7)Authorizes the Department of Conservation (DOC) or DOGGR to  
            inspect the well site or production facilities of any operator  
            to ascertain whether the operator is complying with the  
            requirements of the state's oil and gas laws or regulations.   
            Specifies that inspection will be conducted with the consent  
            of the operator or with a warrant.  Authorizes DOC or DOGGR,  
            in the event of an emergency affecting the public health or  
            safety, to inspect a well site or production facilities  
            without consent or a warrant.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires the state's Oil and Gas Supervisor (Supervisor) to  
            supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and  
            abandonment of wells and the operation, maintenance, and  
            removal or abandonment of tanks and facilities attendant to  
            oil and gas production.
          2)Provides that a person who violates state's oil and gas laws  
            or regulations is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed  
            $25,000 for each violation. 


          3)Establishes procedures for an operator of a well or production  
            facility to appeal to the Director of Conservation (Director)  
            for an order of the Supervisor or a district deputy, including  
            the following:










                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  4





             a)   Requires appeal to be filed within 10 days of the  
               service of the order or waive its rights to challenge the  
               order; 


             b)   Requires a notice of appeal to be filed with the  
               Supervisor or with the district deputy who issued the  
               order; 


             c)   Requires a written notice of appeal to operate as a stay  
               of a shut-in order, except in the case of an emergency  
               order, which require two hearings to issue; and, 


             d)   Requires the Supervisor to reimburse operators for their  
               costs to perform remedial work or tests if the emergency  
               order is set aside or modified.


          4)Allows the Supervisor to impose a state tax lien against the  
            real and personal property of the operator for work performed  
            by DOGGR.


          5)Provides the Supervisor and the Director with the power to  
            administer oaths in an investigation and apply to a judge of  
            the superior court of the county in which the proceeding or  
            investigation is pending for subpoenas for witnesses to attend  
            the proceeding or investigation.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, the costs of this bill are absorbable within existing  
          DOGGR resources, potential minor savings resulting from changes  
          in hearing procedures.


          COMMENTS:  








                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  5







          1)Background.  DOGGR was created in 1915 to supervise the  
            drilling, operation, maintenance, and plugging and abandonment  
            of onshore and offshore oil, gas, and geothermal wells.   
            California is in the top five oil producing states in the  
            country and produced over 200 million barrels of oil in 2014.   
            There has been concern that DOGGR has had too much focus on  
            protection of oil and gas resources in the state from  
            production practices that could harm the ultimate level of  
            hydrocarbon recovery.  This focus has been at the cost of  
            protection of groundwater, occupational safety, and public  
            health.  In October 2015, DOGGR released its "Renewal Plan for  
            Oil and Gas Regulation", which outlines reforms DOGGR will  
            undertake with the goal of having "an effective regulatory  
            program that ensures the protection of public health and the  
            environment in the oil fields of California."  One issue DOGGR  
            has identified as needing improvement is its enforcement of  
            the state's oil and gas laws and regulations.


          2)Penalties.  Current law allows DOGGR to assess between $10,000  
            and $25,000 per day for each violation for well stimulation,  
            but only up to $25,000 per violation for other penalties.   
            Unlike other agencies, such as California Environmental  
            Protection Agency, DOGGR is not authorized as part of a  
            penalty order to permit an operator to fund supplemental  
            environmental projects (SEPs) to benefit impacted communities  
            in lieu of a portion of their civil penalty amount.  This has  
            created issues for DOGGR's enforcement capabilities.  In early  
            2014, a gas leak was detected beneath the community of Arvin,  
            California.  A total of eight families were evacuated from  
            their homes and unable to return for several months.  Affected  
            residents smelled gas and complained of nosebleeds, headaches,  
            coughing, and dizziness.  DOGGR was only able to fine the  
            operator, Petro Capital Recourses, $75,000 for three  
            violations.  This fine does not consider the severity of the  
            violation such as it resulted in evacuations, illnesses, and  
            environmental damage.  The penalty does not act as deterrence,  








                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  6





            because it is not a significant amount of money for the  
            company.  In addition, the operator was prevented from  
            conducting SEPs that could have helped reduce the impacts on  
            the community of Arvin.


            Another example is DOGGR recently issued a $75,000 civil  
            penalty order to the Termo Company for three violations,  
            because the company was illegally venting natural gas in the  
            Aliso Canyon field.  According to the penalty order, "once the  
            pipeline was discovered, Operator destroyed the evidence of  
            its existence before the division personnel could fully  
            inspect it.  The brazen nature of this violation shows that  
            operator held little to no regard for the statutes and  
            regulations or, more importantly, public health and safety."   
            DOGGR is not able to take into account the intentionality of  
            the violation or how many days it occurred when issuing  
            penalty orders.  This bill enhances DOGGR's penalty authority  
            and allows SEPs for 50% of a total civil penalty.  In  
            addition, this bill creates a separate penalty account for  
            four years that, upon appropriation, may be used by DOGGR to  
            deal with clean up and orphan well issues. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092  FN:  
          0003381


















                                                                    AB 2756


                                                                    Page  7