BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2763|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 2763
Author: Gatto (D)
Amended: 6/30/16 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 11-0, 6/21/16
AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Gaines, Galgiani, Leyva,
McGuire, Mendoza, Roth, Wieckowski
SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE: 9-0, 6/27/16
AYES: Morrell, Cannella, Gaines, Hertzberg, Hill, Lara, Leyva,
McGuire, Pavley
NO VOTE RECORDED: Hueso, Wolk
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 8/8/16
AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-2, 5/23/16 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Transportation network companies: personal vehicles
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST: This bill defines "personal vehicle" in the context of
Transportation Network Companies (TNCs).
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1)Defines a "transportation network company" as an organization
that provides prearranged transportation services for
AB 2763
Page 2
compensation using an online-enabled application or platform
to connect passengers with drivers using a personal vehicle
(e.g., Lyft and Uber).
2)Defines a "participating driver" or "driver" as any person who
uses a vehicle in connection with a TNC online-enabled
application or platform to connect passengers.
3)Authorizes the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
to regulate TNCs.
4)Requires a TNC and any participating driver to maintain
specified insurance coverage, and specifies when the insurance
is in effect.
This bill defines "personal vehicle" as a vehicle used by a
participating driver to provide prearranged transportation
services for compensation, that:
1)Has a passenger capacity of eight persons or less, including
the driver.
2)Is owned, leased, rented for a term that does not exceed 30
days, or otherwise authorized for use by the participating
driver.
3)Meets all inspection and other safety requirements imposed by
the CPUC.
4)Is not a taxicab or limousine.
Comments
1)Purpose. The author believes that this bill is needed to
determine the ownership, lease, and rental terms under which a
car may be driven by a TNC driver. This bill will ensure that
short-term auto rentals or leases provide all individuals who
have an interest in providing TNC services, especially those
of low income, the opportunity to do so.
AB 2763
Page 3
In developing its regulations, the CPUC has relied on state
law, which uses the term "personal vehicle." While the
definition may seem so obvious as to not need its own
definition in the statutes, it is actually not clear. This
bill clarifies that a personal vehicle includes a car that is
leased or rented. On June 6, 2016, the CPUC asked parties for
comments on, among other things, defining personal vehicles.
That question was raised because the CPUC is considering
whether there should be a maximum or minimum period of the
rental or lease agreement to qualify a vehicle as personal and
therefore prohibit the vehicle from being used by a TNC
driver. The effect of this bill is to provide that definition
and moot the CPUC's question, thereby allowing the use of
leased or rented vehicles by TNC drivers irrespective of the
rental or lease duration.
2)Making it easy. Lyft and Uber have programs to help drivers
own, lease, or rent vehicles. Under these programs, the
rental/lease payment is deducted from the driver earnings.
Third-party companies have also been created which also
provide leases/rentals for potential Lyft and Uber drivers for
durations as short as an hour.
3)Curbing enthusiasm. Bill supporters enthuse that this bill
will make it easier for those of modest means to earn income
as TNC drivers by renting or leasing a car. The driver's
profitability will depend on how many rides they provide and
how much they make on each ride. This may well be a
win-win-win for the driver, lessor, and TNC, though a driver
would be wise to note that he is committing to a fixed payment
while his income is variable; he doesn't control the price he
charges; competition from drivers is increasing; and he gets
paid only after his obligation to the lessor is fulfilled.
Caveat emptor.
Bill supporters also state that this bill will encourage the
use of more environmentally friendly and electric vehicles.
AB 2763
Page 4
That's likely if the rented/leased vehicles are relatively
new, as newer vehicles are much cleaner and more efficient
than older vehicles. But while some of the leasing programs
are focused on hybrid and electric vehicles, there is no
requirement for those. And the environmental and congestion
effects of large numbers of vehicles circulating on streets
waiting for rides are unclear.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
According to the Senate Appropriation Committee,
the CPUC estimates costs of approximately $140,000 (PUC
Transportation Reimbursement Account) for 1PY of staff for
additional regulatory oversight, assuming the explicit
authorization of short-term rental and leasing of vehicles as
TNC vehicles results in a significant increase in vehicles
subject to CPUC oversight.
Staff notes that the CPUC is currently considering a proposal to
allow TNCs to use leased and rented vehicles. As such, this
bill could be perceived as simply providing legislative guidance
in the existing proceeding. Assuming leased and rented vehicles
would be authorized for use by TNCs in both cases (through the
bill or the existing proceeding), any costs related to oversight
of additional vehicles may be incurred by CPUC regardless of
this bill.
SUPPORT: (Verified8/9/16)
California Chamber of Commerce
Circulate San Diego
City of Beverly Hills
Climate Resolve
AB 2763
Page 5
Electric Vehicle Charging Association
Enterprise Holdings
Evercar
Greenbelt Alliance
Internet Association
Lyft
Nrg
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce
Silicon Valley Leadership Group
SPUR
Planning and Conservation League
TechNet
TransForm
Uber
Volta
OPPOSITION: (Verified8/9/16)
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
San Francisco Taxi Workers Alliance
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-2, 5/23/16
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow,
Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos,
Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh,
Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina
Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,
Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones,
Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,
Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,
Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,
Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,
Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
NOES: Roger Hernández, Nazarian
NO VOTE RECORDED: Arambula, Eggman, Patterson
Prepared by:Erin Riches / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
8/10/16 15:58:36
AB 2763
Page 6
**** END ****