Amended in Senate June 22, 2016

Amended in Assembly April 7, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 17, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2792


Introduced by Assembly Member Bonta

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Alejo)

February 19, 2016


An act to add Chapter 17.2 (commencing with Section 7283) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to local government.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2792, as amended, Bonta. Local law enforcement agencies: federal immigration policy enforcement.

Existing federal law authorizes issuance of an immigration detainer that serves to advise another law enforcement agency that the federal department seeks custody of an alien presently in the custody of that agency, for the purpose of arresting and removing the alien. Existing federal law provides that the detainer is a request that the agency advise the department, prior to release of the alien, in order for the department to arrange to assume custody in situations when gaining immediate physical custody is either impracticable or impossible.

Existing law, commonly known as the TRUST Act, prohibits a law enforcement official, as defined, from detaining an individual on the basis of a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold after that individual becomes eligible for release from custody, unless, at the time that the individual becomes eligible for release from custody, certain conditions are met, including, among other things, that the individual has been convicted of specified crimes. Existing law defines specified terms for purposes of these provisions.

This bill, the Transparent Review of Unjust Transfers and Holds (TRUTH) Act, would authorize a local law enforcement agency to participate in a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) immigration enforcement program only if it enters into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the governing body of the political subdivision in which the law enforcement agency isbegin delete locatedend deletebegin insert located, or the governing body adopts a binding policy directive, as specified,end insert that describes the terms and conditions pursuant to which the agency will participate in the immigration enforcement program. The bill would authorize the MOUbegin insert or policyend insert to take effect 30 days after ratification by the governing body, and would authorize the MOUbegin insert or policyend insert to be valid for a period not exceedingbegin delete 2end deletebegin insert 3end insert years. The bill would require the MOUbegin insert or policyend insert and any records related to its development be public records for purposes of the California Public Records Act. The bill would require the local governing body to holdbegin delete at least 3 community forumsend deletebegin insert a community forum or forums, as specified,end insert to provide information to the public about the policy under consideration, and to receive and consider public comment before entering into thebegin delete MOU.end deletebegin insert MOU or policy.end insert The bill would require the MOUbegin insert or policyend insert to require compliance with the TRUST Act, prohibit law enforcement responses to ICE notification or transfer requests except in those situations in which a law enforcement official would have discretion to detain an individual, requiring compliance with local ordinances or policies that limits law enforcement responses to ICE notifications, or detainer or transfer requests, prohibit execution of an ICE detainer or transferbegin delete request andend deletebegin insert request,end insert a plan to ensure that ICE does not have access to individuals protected from continued detention on the basis of an immigrationbegin delete hold.end deletebegin insert hold, and a plan to ensure that any individual who is not protected from continued detention is served a copy of any ICE detainer, transfer, or notification request issued for him or her, as specified.end insert By requiring these local agencies to comply with these requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.begin insert The bill would also prohibit police and security departments of theend insertbegin insert California State University, community colleges, schools, and school districts from participating in any ICE immigration enforcement program.end insert

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose.

This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2Transparent Review of Unjust Transfers and Holds (TRUTH) Act.

3

SEC. 2.  

(a) Transparency and accountability are essential
4minimum requirements for any collaboration between state and
5federal agencies.

6(b) Recent immigration enforcement programs sponsored by
7the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
8agency have suffered from a lack of transparency and
9accountability.

10(c) For example, a federal judge found that ICE “went out of
11[its] way to mislead the public about Secure Communities,” a
12deportation program in which ICE collaborated with local law
13enforcement agencies to identify people for deportation.

14(d) The Legislature further found that Secure Communities
15harmed community policing and shifted the burden of federal
16immigration enforcement onto local law enforcement agencies.

17(e) Although ICE has terminated the Secure Communities
18program, it continues to promote a number of similar programs,
19including the Priority Enforcement Program, the 287(g) Program,
20and the Criminal Alien Program.

21(f) The Priority Enforcement Program has many similarities to
22Secure Communities, including the checking of fingerprints for
23immigration purposes at the point of arrest; the continued use of
P4    1immigration detainers, which have been found by the courts to
2pose constitutional concerns; and the reliance on local law
3enforcement to assist in immigration enforcement.

4(g) Just as with Secure Communities, numerous questions have
5been raised about whether ICE has been transparent and
6accountable with respect to its current deportation programs.

7(h) This bill seeks to address the lack of transparency and
8accountability by ensuring that all ICE deportation programs that
9depend on entanglement with local law enforcement agencies in
10California are subject to meaningful public oversight and meet
11certain minimum standards.

12

SEC. 3.  

Chapter 17.2 (commencing with Section 7283) is added
13to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read:

14 

15Chapter  17.2. Standards for Participation in United
16States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Programs
17

 

18

7283.  

For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have
19the following meanings:

begin insert

20
(a) “Community forum” includes, but is not limited to, any
21regular meeting of the local governing body that is open to the
22public, where the public may provide comment, is in an accessible
23location, and is noticed at least 30 days in advance.

end insert
begin delete

12 24(a)

end delete

25begin insert(b)end insert “Detainer request” means a federal Immigration and Customs
26Enforcement (ICE) request that a local law enforcement agency
27maintain custody of an individual currently in its custody beyond
28the time he or she would otherwise be eligible for release in order
29to facilitate transfer to ICE and includes, but is not limited to,
30Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-247D.

begin insert

31
(c) “Governing body” with respect to a county, means the
32county board of supervisors.

end insert
begin delete

18 33(b)

end delete

34begin insert(d)end insert “ICE immigration enforcement program” means any program
35begin delete throughend deletebegin insert or practice byend insert which thebegin delete federalend deletebegin insert United Statesend insert Immigration
36and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency works with local law
37enforcementbegin delete agenciesend deletebegin insert agencies, or police and security departments
38of the University of California, California State University,
39community colleges, schools, and school districtsend insert
to detect, detain,
40transfer, or share information about individuals who allegedly are
P5    1noncitizens or who have committed civil immigration violations,
2or to station ICE agents in local jails,begin insert or to interview individuals
3in local jails about alleged civil immigration violations, or to issue
4or respond to detainer, notification, or transfer requests,end insert
and
5includes, but is not limited to, the Priority Enforcement Program,
6the 287(g) Program, and the Criminal Alien Program.

begin delete

26 7(c)

end delete

8begin insert(e)end insert “Local law enforcement agency” means any agency of a
9city, county, city and county, special district, or other political
10subdivision of the state that is authorized to enforce criminal
11statutes, regulations, or local ordinances; or to operate jails or to
12maintain custody of individuals in jails; or to operate juvenile
13detention facilities or to maintain custody of individuals in juvenile
14detention facilities.

begin delete

33 15(d)

end delete

16begin insert(f)end insert “Notification request” means an Immigration and Customs
17Enforcement request that a local law enforcement agency inform
18ICE of the release date and time of an individual in its custody and
19includes, but is not limited to, DHS Form I-247N.

begin insert

20
(g) “Small city” means a city with a population of 100,000 or
21less, as determined by the annual city total population rankings
22by the Demographic Research Unit of the Department of Finance.

end insert
begin delete

37 23(e)

end delete

24begin insert(h)end insert “Transfer request” means an Immigration and Customs
25Enforcement request that a local law enforcement agency facilitate
26the transfer of an individual in its custody to ICE, and includes,
27but is not limited to, DHS Form I-247X.

28

7293.1.  

(a) A local law enforcement agency may participate
29inbegin delete a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)end deletebegin insert an ICEend insert
30 immigration enforcement program only if the law enforcement
31agency and the governing body of the political subdivision in which
32the law enforcement agency is located enter into a memorandum
33of understanding (MOU)begin insert in the case of a local law enforcement
34agency headed by an elected official, or the governing body adopts
35a binding policy directive, in the case of a local law enforcement
36agency headed by an employee of the political subdivision hired
37and fired by the governing body,end insert
that describes the terms and
38conditions pursuant to which the local law enforcement agency
39will participate in the immigration enforcement program. The
40MOUbegin insert or policyend insert shall only take effect 30 days after ratification of
P6    1the MOUbegin insert or policyend insert by vote of the governing body of the political
2subdivision in which the law enforcement agency is located.

3(b) The MOUbegin insert or policyend insert and any records related to the
4development of thebegin delete MOU,end deletebegin insert MOU or policy,end insert including, but not
5limited to, records of communication with ICE, shall be public
6records for purposes of the California Public Records Act (Chapter
73.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1).

8(c) An MOUbegin insert or policyend insert enacted under this chapter shall be valid
9for a period not exceedingbegin delete twoend deletebegin insert threeend insert years. Renewal of an MOU
10begin insert or policyend insert requires compliance with all of the provision of this
11chapter, including the public input process described in subdivision
12(d) and an evaluation of whether the conditions described in
13subdivision (e) have been fully implemented. An MOUbegin insert or policyend insert
14 may be renewed for a period not exceedingbegin delete twoend deletebegin insert threeend insert years. An
15MOUbegin insert or policyend insert may remain in effect for a period not exceeding
16six months following the two-year period if the renewal process
17began at least three months before expiration of the initialbegin delete two-yearend delete
18begin insert three-yearend insert period.

19(d) Before entering into anbegin delete MOU,end deletebegin insert MOU or policy,end insert the local
20governing body shall hold at least three community forums that
21are open to the public on different days, in accessible locations,
22and with at least 30 days notice to the public to provide information
23to the public about the policy under consideration and to receive
24and consider publicbegin delete comment.end deletebegin insert comment, except that the local
25governing body of a small city shall be required to hold only one
26forum.end insert
The community forums shall be held pursuant to the Ralph
27M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of
28Part 1 of Division 2 of Titlebegin delete 5.)end deletebegin insert 5).end insert

begin insert

29
(e) An MOU or policy enacted under this chapter shall be
30incorporated into any contract for the operation of a
31government-owned detention facility entered into by a local law
32enforcement agency or the governing body of the political
33subdivision in which the law enforcement agency is located.

end insert
34

7293.2.  

(a) An MOUbegin insert or policyend insert entered into pursuant to this
35chapter shall include all of the following:

36(1) A provision requiring compliance with Sections 7282 and
377282.5, commonly known as the TRUST Act.

38(2) A prohibition on law enforcement responses to ICE
39notification or transfer requests except in those situations in which
40a law enforcement official would have discretion to detain an
P7    1individual on the basis of an immigration hold pursuant to Section
27282.5.

3(3) A provision requiring compliance with any local ordinance
4or policy that limits law enforcement responses to ICE
5notifications, or detainer or transfer requests.

begin delete

6(4) A prohibition on executing an ICE detainer or transfer
7request that does not indicate, in writing, whether the request is
8supported by a judicial warrant.

end delete
begin delete

9(5)

end delete

10begin insert(4)end insert A plan to ensure that ICE does not have access to an
11individual protected from continued detention under Section
127282.5, including, but not limited to, notification in advance of
13the publicbegin delete regarding the release date and time of an individual in
14the custody of local law enforcementend delete
begin insert that the individual is being
15or will be released at a certain date and timeend insert
through data sharing
16or otherwise, the ability to interview the individual, and access to
17nonpublicly available personal identifying information, including
18work or home addresses, of the individual.

begin insert

19
(5) A plan to ensure that any individual not protected from
20continued detention under Section 7282.5 is served with a copy of
21any ICE detainer, transfer, or notification request issued for him
22or her and is provided a written consent form in advance of any
23 interview with ICE that explains the purpose of the interview, that
24the interview is voluntary, and that he or she may decline to be
25interviewed or may choose to be interviewed only with his or her
26attorney present.

end insert

27(b) Unless otherwise prohibited by a local ordinance, law
28enforcement policy, or an MOUbegin insert or policyend insert entered into pursuant
29to this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall prohibit a local law
30enforcement agency from responding to an ICE notification or
31transfer request if a law enforcement official would have discretion
32to detain an individual on the basis of an immigration hold pursuant
33to Section 7282.5.

begin insert
34

begin insert7293.3.end insert  

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
35chapter, police and security departments of the California State
36University, California Community Colleges, schools, and school
37districts shall not participate in any ICE immigration enforcement
38program.

39
(b) The University of California is requested to comply with
40this section.

end insert
P8    1

SEC. 4.  

The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of
2this act, which adds Chapter 17.2 (commencing with Section 7283)
3to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, furthers, within
4the meaning of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of
5Article I of the California Constitution, the purposes of that
6constitutional section as it relates to the right of public access to
7the meetings of local public bodies or the writings of local public
8officials and local agencies. Pursuant to paragraph (7) of
9subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California
10Constitution, the Legislature makes the following findings:

11By requiring public meetings relating to the manner in which
12local law enforcement entities cooperate with federal authorities
13in enforcing federal immigration laws and making related
14documents open to public inspection this act furthers the purposes
15of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the
16California Constitution.

17

SEC. 5.  

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
18Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
19the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
20district under this act would result from a legislative mandate that
21is within the scope of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section
223 of Article I of the California Constitution.



O

    96