BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2792 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2792 (Bonta) As Amended April 7, 2016 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Public Safety |5-2 |Jones-Sawyer, Lopez, |Melendez, Lackey | | | |Low, Quirk, Santiago | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |13-5 |Gonzalez, Bloom, |Bigelow, Gallagher, | | | |Bonilla, Bonta, |Jones, Obernolte, | | | |Calderon, Daly, |Wagner | | | |Eggman, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Requires a memorandum of understanding (MOU), meeting specific criteria, between the governing body of the appropriate political subdivision and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in order for a local law enforcement agency to participate AB 2792 Page 2 in an immigration enforcement program. Specifically, this bill: 1)Authorizes a local law enforcement agency to participate in a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) immigration enforcement program only if it enters into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the governing body of the political subdivision in which the law enforcement agency is located that describes the terms and conditions pursuant to which the agency will participate in the immigration enforcement program. 2)States that the MOU must require compliance with the Transparency and Responsibility Using State Tools (TRUST) Act. 3)States that the MOU must prohibit law enforcement responses to ICE notification or transfer requests except in those situations in which a law enforcement official would have discretion to detain an individual under the TRUST Act. 4)Specifies that the MOU must contain a provision requiring compliance with any local ordinance or policy that limits law enforcement responses to ICE notifications, or detainer or transfer requests. 5)States that the MOU must have a prohibition on executing an ICE detainer or transfer request that does not indicate, in writing, whether the request is supported by a judicial warrant. 6)Requires the MOU to have a plan to ensure that ICE does not have access to an individual protected from continued detention under the TRUST Act, including, but not limited to, notification of the presence of the individual in the custody of local law enforcement through data sharing or otherwise, the ability to interview the individual, and access to the personal identifying information, including work or home AB 2792 Page 3 addresses, of the individual. 7)Specifies that unless otherwise prohibited by a local ordinance, law enforcement policy, or an MOU entered into pursuant to this chapter, nothing in this bill shall prohibit a local law enforcement agency from responding to an ICE notification or transfer request if a law enforcement official would have discretion to detain an individual on the basis of an immigration as specified. 8)Specifies that the MOU must prohibit execution of an ICE detainer or transfer request and a plan to ensure that ICE does not have access to individuals protected from continued detention on the basis of an immigration hold. 9)Requires the MOU and any records related to its development be a public record for purposes of the California Public Records Act. 10)Requires the local governing body to hold at least three community forums to provide information to the public about the policy under consideration, and to receive and consider public comment before entering into the MOU. 11)Authorizes the MOU to take effect 30 days after ratification by the governing body. 12) Specifies that the MOU be valid for a period not exceeding two years. 13)Defines "ICE immigration enforcement program" as "any program through which ICE works with local law enforcement agencies to AB 2792 Page 4 detect, detain, transfer, or share information about individuals who allegedly are noncitizens or who have committed civil immigration violations, or to station ICE agents in local jails." 14)Defines "detainer request" as "an ICE request that a local law enforcement agency maintain custody of an individual currently in its custody beyond the time he or she would otherwise be eligible for release in order to facilitate transfer to ICE." 15)Defines "notification request" as "an ICE request that a local law enforcement agency inform ICE of the release date and time of an individual in its custody." 16)Defines "transfer request" as "an ICE request that a local law enforcement agency facilitate the transfer of an individual in its custody to ICE." EXISTING FEDERAL LAW: 1)Provides that any authorized immigration officer may at any time issue Immigration Detainer-Notice of Action, to any other federal, state, or local law enforcement agency. A detainer serves to advise another law enforcement agency that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seeks custody of an alien presently in the custody of that agency, for the purpose of arresting and removing the alien. The detainer is a request that such agency advise the DHS, prior to release of the alien, in order for the DHS to arrange to assume custody, in situations when gaining immediate physical custody is either impracticable or impossible. 2)States that upon a determination by the DHS to issue a detainer for an alien not otherwise detained by a criminal AB 2792 Page 5 justice agency, such agency shall maintain custody of the alien for a period not to exceed 48 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays in order to permit assumption of custody by the DHS. 3)Authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security under the 287(g) program to enter into agreements that delegate immigration powers to local police. The negotiated agreements between ICE and the local police are documented in memorandum of agreements (MOAs). 4)Provides that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. EXISTING LAW: 1)Defines "immigration hold" as "an immigration detainer issued by an authorized immigration officer, pursuant to specified regulations, that requests that the law enforcement official to maintain custody of the individual for a period not to exceed 48 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, and to advise the authorized immigration officer prior to the release of that individual." 2)States that a law enforcement official shall have discretion to cooperate with federal immigration officials by detaining an individual on the basis of an immigration hold after that individual becomes eligible for release from custody only if the continued detention of the individual on the basis of the immigration hold would not violate any federal, state, or local law, or any local policy, and only under the following circumstances: AB 2792 Page 6 a) The individual has been convicted of a serious or violent felony; b) The individual has been convicted of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison; c) The individual has been convicted within the past five years of a misdemeanor for a crime that is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony, or has been convicted at any time of a specified felony; d) The individual is a current registrant on the California Sex and Arson Registry; e) The individual is arrested and taken before a magistrate on a charge involving a serious or violent felony, a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison, or other specified felonies, and the magistrate makes a finding of probable cause as to that charge after a preliminary hearing; and f) The individual has been convicted of a federal crime that meets the definition of an aggravated felony as specified, or is identified by the United States Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement as the subject of an outstanding federal felony arrest warrant. 3)States that if none of the conditions listed above is satisfied, an individual shall not be detained on the basis of an immigration hold after the individual becomes eligible for release from custody. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations AB 2792 Page 7 Committee, unknown nonreimbursable costs to local agencies to comply with the public forum requirements and request for public records if the local law enforcement agency opts to participate in a federal ICE immigration enforcement program. COMMENTS: According to the author, "Immigrant communities form an integral part of our state's social fabric. When Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) coerces local law enforcement to carry out deportations, family members are separated and community trust destroyed, and undocumented witnesses and victims are afraid to step forward or seek help. "In 2013, Governor Brown signed AB 4 [(Ammiano), Chapter 570], the TRUST Act, which protected community members from being detained by local law enforcement under immigration holds requested by ICE. Prior to the TRUST Act, ICE requested local jails hold community members until they could be picked up for deportation. From tamale vendors to domestic violence survivors transferred to ICE for deportation, the holds caused significant suffering and further weakened community-police relations as ICE sought to have local police officers and sheriff's deputies help it carry out mass deportation. After TRUST went into effect, a federal court found all immigration holds unconstitutional, but ICE has continued to circumvent the protections of TRUST by requesting local law enforcement notify them of personal information, such as release time and location. "With AB 2792, the Transparent Review of Unjust Transfers and Holds (TRUTH) Act, we close that loophole and build upon the TRUST Act by. The TRUTH Act requires a transparent process, including community engagement, prior to local law enforcement participation in ICE deportation programs. Local law enforcement must then reach an agreement with their city council or county supervisors, dictating the terms and conditions of any AB 2792 Page 8 participation in such programs, including compliance with the state's TRUST Act. "The TRUTH Act requires critical transparency from ICE, ensures local communities have a voice, and creates clear guidelines to guard against future abuses." Analysis Prepared by: David Billingsley/ PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 FN: 0002809