BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2801| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 2801 Author: Gallagher (R) Amended: 5/4/16 in Assembly Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/15/16 AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/19/16 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Local government: fees and charges: written protest SOURCE: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association DIGEST: This bill requires local agencies to retain written protests for a minimum of two years. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Requires local governments to follow specified procedures to impose fees, assessments, and taxes, including voter approval in some cases. AB 2801 Page 2 2)Specifies the process for seeking voter approval and requires local officials to hold ballots for at least two years following the election (SB 553, Yee, Chapter 215, Statutes of 2013), including: a) Prior to imposing or increasing a property-related fee, a local government is required to identify the parcels, mail a written notice to all the property owners subject to the fee detailing the amount of the fee, the reason for the fee, and the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed fee. b) No sooner than 45 days after mailing the notice to property owners, the agency must conduct a public hearing on the proposed fee. c) If a majority of owners of the identified parcels provide written protests against the fee, it cannot be imposed or increased by the agency. d) Only one written protest per parcel, filed by an owner or tenant of the parcel, counts in order to calculate the majority protest. 3)Establishes similar procedures for assessments (SB 1477, Lewis, Chapter 220, Statutes of 2000). This bill requires an agency that proposes to charge a new property related fee or increase an existing one to maintain all written protests for at least two years after the hearing at which the protests were counted. Background AB 2801 Page 3 Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218, 1996) distinguishes among fees for property-related services, taxes, and assessments, and local governments must take certain actions before they can impose those charges. Counties and other local agencies with police powers may impose any one of these charges on property owners, after meeting the requirements established by Proposition 218. Special districts created by statute, however, must have specific authority for each of these revenue sources. The Constitution defines a fee (or charge) as any levy other than an ad valorem tax, special tax, or assessment that is imposed by a local government on a parcel or on a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee for a property-related service. The fee imposed on any parcel or person cannot exceed the proportional cost of the service that is attributable to the parcel. Additionally, a property-related fee cannot be imposed for general governmental services like police, fire, and library services. The Legislature enacted the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act to translate many of Proposition 218's requirements into statutory definitions and procedures (SB 919, Rainey, 1997). Prior to imposing or increasing a property-related fee, a local government is required to identify the parcels, mail a written notice to all the property owners subject to the fee detailing the amount of the fee, the reason for the fee, and the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed fee. No sooner than 45 days after mailing the notice to property owners, the agency must conduct a public hearing on the proposed fee. If a majority of owners of the identified parcels provide written protests against the fee, it cannot be imposed or increased by the agency. Only one written protest per parcel, filed by an owner or tenant of the parcel, counts in order to calculate the majority protest. Additionally, the California Constitution requires voter approval for most property-related fees, except for fees or AB 2801 Page 4 charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, which are specifically exempted from the voter approval requirement. State law specifies the process for seeking voter approval and requires local officials to hold ballots for at least two years following the election (SB 553, Yee, 2013). Previous legislation established similar procedures for assessments (SB 1477, Lewis, 2000). Some taxpayer advocates want to clarify the requirements local agencies must meet following a protest hearing for a fee increase. Comments Purpose of the bill. On several occasions, the Legislature has recognized the value in preserving records related to Proposition 218's requirements for imposing fees and charges on property owners. Most recently, SB 553 enacted a comprehensive framework for conducting elections for those property-related fees that require voter approval, including a requirement to hold ballots for two years. But written protests are not as transparent and accessible as the ballots for other types of fees and charges, even though both protests and ballots determine whether a fee may be imposed. By requiring local officials to retain written protests for at least two years following the protest hearing, AB 2801 takes a small but important step towards preserving written protests so that the public can be certain of the integrity of protest procedures. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes SUPPORT: (Verified6/29/16) Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (source) AB 2801 Page 5 OPPOSITION: (Verified6/29/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/19/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mayes, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Wood, Rendon NO VOTE RECORDED: Chang, Mathis, McCarty, Williams Prepared by:Anton Favorini-Csorba / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119 6/29/16 15:50:54 **** END ****