AB 2818, as introduced, Chiu. Property taxation: assessment.
Existing law requires the county assessor to consider, when valuing real property for property taxation purposes, the effect of any enforceable restrictions to which the use of the land may be subjected, including, but not limited to, zoning, recorded contracts with governmental agencies, and various other restrictions imposed by governments.
This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to that provision.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
2 is amended to read:
(a) In the assessment of land, the assessor shall consider
4the effect upon value of any enforceable restrictions to which the
5use of the land may be subjected. These restrictionsbegin delete shallend delete include,
6but are not limited to, all of the following:
7(1) Zoning.
P2 1(2) Recorded contracts with governmental agencies other than
2those provided in Sections 422, 422.5, and 422.7.
3(3) Permit authority of, and permits issued by, governmental
4agencies exercising land use powers concurrently with local
5governments, including the California Coastal Commission and
6regional coastal
commissions, the San Francisco Bay Conservation
7and Development Commission, and the Tahoe Regional Planning
8Agency.
9(4) Development controls of a local government in accordance
10with any local coastal program certified pursuant to Division 20
11(commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code.
12(5) Development controls of a local government in accordance
13with a local protection program, or any component thereof, certified
14pursuant to Division 19 (commencing with Section 29000) of the
15Public Resources Code.
16(6) Environmental constraints applied to the use of land pursuant
17to provisions of statutes.
18(7) Hazardous waste land use restriction pursuant to Section
1925226 of the Health and Safety Code.
20(8) (A) A recorded conservation, trail, or scenic easement, as
21described in Section 815.1 of the Civil Code, that is granted in
22favor of a public agency, or in favor of a nonprofit corporation
23organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
24Code that has as its primary purpose the preservation, protection,
25or enhancement of land in its natural, scenic, historical, agricultural,
26forested, or open-space condition or use.
27(B) A recorded greenway easement, as described in Section
28816.52 of the Civil Code, that is granted in favor of a public
29agency, or in favor of a nonprofit corporation organized pursuant
30to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that has as its
31primary purpose the developing and preserving of greenways.
32(9) A solar-use easement pursuant to Chapter 6.9 (commencing
33with Section 51190) of Part 1 of Division 1
of Title 5 of the
34Government Code.
35(10) A contract where the following apply:
36(A) The contract is with a nonprofit corporation organized
37pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that
38has received a welfare exemption under Section 214.15 for
39properties intended to be sold to low-income families who
40participate in a special no-interest loan program.
P3 1(B) The contract restricts the use of the land for at least 30 years
2to owner-occupied housing available at affordable housing cost in
3accordance with Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
4(C) The contract includes a deed of trust on the property in favor
5of the nonprofit corporation to ensure compliance with the terms
6of the program, which has no value unless the owner fails to
7
comply with the covenants and restrictions of the terms of the
8home sale.
9(D) The local housing authority or an equivalent agency, or, if
10none exists, the city attorney or county counsel, has made a finding
11that the long-term deed restrictions in the contract serve a public
12purpose.
13(E) The contract is recorded and provided to the assessor.
14(b) There is a rebuttable presumption that restrictions will not
15be removed or substantially modified in the predictable future and
16that they will substantially equate the value of the land to the value
17attributable to the legally permissible use or uses.
18(c) Grounds for rebutting the presumption may include, but are
19not necessarily limited to, the past history of like use restrictions
20in the jurisdiction in question
and the similarity of sales prices for
21restricted and unrestricted land. The possible expiration of a
22restriction at a time certain shall not be conclusive evidence of the
23future removal or modification of the restriction unless there is no
24opportunity or likelihood of the continuation or renewal of the
25restriction, or unless a necessary party to the restriction has
26indicated an intent to permit its expiration at that time.
27(d) In assessing land with respect to which the presumption is
28unrebutted, the assessor shall not consider sales of otherwise
29comparable land not similarly restricted as to use as indicative of
30value of land under restriction, unless the restrictions have a
31demonstrably minimal effect upon value.
32(e) In assessing land under an enforceable use restriction wherein
33the presumption of no predictable removal or substantial
34modification of the restriction has been
rebutted, but where the
35restriction nevertheless retains some future life and has some effect
36on present value, the assessor may consider, in addition to all other
37legally permissible information, representative sales of comparable
38lands that are not under restriction but upon which natural
39limitations have substantially the same effect as restrictions.
P4 1(f) For the purposes of this section the following definitions
2apply:
3(1) “Comparable lands” are lands that are similar to the land
4being valued in respect to legally permissible uses and physical
5attributes.
6(2) “Representative sales information” is information from sales
7of a sufficient number of comparable lands to give an accurate
8indication of the full cash value of the land being valued.
9(g) It is
hereby declared that the purpose and intent of the
10Legislature in enacting this section is to provide for a method of
11determining whether a sufficient amount of representative sales
12information is available for land under use restriction to ensure
13the accurate assessment of that land. It is also hereby declared that
14the further purpose and intent of the Legislature in enacting this
15section and Section 1630 is to avoid an assessment policy which,
16in the absence of special circumstances, considers uses for land
17that legally are not available to the owner and not contemplated
18by government, and that these sections are necessary to implement
19the public policy of encouraging and maintaining effective land
20use planning. This statute shall not be construed as requiring the
21assessment of any land at a value less than as required by Section
22401 or as prohibiting the use of representative comparable sales
23information on land under similar restrictions when this information
24is
available.
O
99