BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2862


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2862 (O'Donnell)


          As Amended  May 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |7-0  |O'Donnell, Olsen,     |                    |
          |                |     |Kim, McCarty,         |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Thurmond,   |                    |
          |                |     |Weber                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 









                                                                    AB 2862


                                                                    Page  2






          SUMMARY:  Authorizes the Superintendent of Public Instruction  
          (SPI) to recommend to the State Board of Education (SBE)  
          revisions to the content standards in visual and performing arts  
          (VAPA), and authorizes the SBE to adopt, reject, or modify the  
          revised standards by January 1, 2019.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Authorizes the SPI to recommend to the SBE revisions to the  
            visual and performing arts standards.  


          2)Requires that, on or before January 1, 2019, the SBE adopt,  
            reject, or modify any modifications proposed by the SPI.  


          3)Requires that if the SBE modifies these revised standards, it  
            explain, in writing, to the Governor and the Legislature the  
            reasons for modifying the standards.


          4)Requires the SPI, in consultation with the SBE to select a  
            group of experts in VAPA for purposes of assisting the SPI in  
            developing recommendations on modifications to the standards.   
            Requires that a majority of this group are current classroom  
            teachers who have valid professional teaching credentials  
            under state law.


          5)Requires that the National Core Arts Standards, developed by  
            the National Coalition for Core Arts Standards serve as the  
            basis for deliberations regarding revisions to the standards.


          6)Requires the SPI to hold a minimum of two public hearings in  
            order for the public to provide input on the modifications,  
            prior to action by the SBE.










                                                                    AB 2862


                                                                    Page  3





          7)Requires the public meetings to be held pursuant to the  
            Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, General Fund costs to the California Department of  
          Education (CDE) of approximately $660,000 to develop the content  
          standards. 


          Need for the bill.  According to the author's office, "Extensive  
          research demonstrates the connection between visual and  
          performing arts education and student engagement.  Arts  
          education contributes to higher test scores and reduces truancy  
          and dropout rates.


          Adopted in 2001, California's visual and performing arts  
          standards are one of the oldest sets of state standards that  
          have not been revised, and are in urgent need of an update to  
          allow students to benefit from current curriculum, instruction,  
          and instructional materials.  Since 2001 major changes have  
          occurred in teaching and learning.  


          Arts education provides key opportunities for critical thinking  
          and inquiry - hallmarks of the state's Common Core State  
          Standards - but our current arts curriculum is out of alignment  
          with these standards.  This represents a tremendous missed  
          opportunity for students and teachers.


          Ten percent of California's jobs are in the creative industry,  
          and 8% of the state's productivity is related to the arts.  It  
          is in the economic interest of students and the state to  
          provide students the most current and relevant instruction so  
          that they are career-ready in the arts."










                                                                    AB 2862


                                                                    Page  4





          Should VAPA be next?  Apart from History-Social Science (for  
          which a new framework is under development), the VAPA standards  
          adopted in 2001 are the oldest set of state standards.  


          According to the author, California's 2001 standards are not  
          reflective of many changes in the field of VAPA, and create a  
          mixed message for educators in the field.  The College Board  
          notes that while "arts educators commonly report expectations in  
          their districts that arts teaching and learning practices will  
          be aligned with the goals and objectives of the Common Core,"  
          California's standards are not aligned with the Common Core  
          state standards.  The author states that teaching credential  
          candidates being trained in preparation programs are being  
          trained with the new National Core Arts Standards because they  
          are aligned to the Common Core state standards, but when hired  
          to teach in the public schools are expected to teach - and are  
          evaluated on the basis of - the state's outdated standards.  In  
          addition, the VAPA curriculum framework is due to be revised in  
          2020, and an update to content standards is needed prior to the  
          framework revision, or the new framework will reflect outdated  
          standards.  


          VAPA instructional materials out-of-date.  The state's current  
          VAPA standards date to 2001.  Instructional materials were also  
          adopted that year.  The VAPA framework was subsequently adopted  
          in 2004, but there was no instructional materials adoption.  As  
          a result, the state-adopted instructional materials in this  
          content area are 15 years old, and are viewed as highly  
          out-of-date.


          Process similar to SB 1200 for revising math and science  
          standards.  The process proposed by this bill for the updating  
          of VAPA standards is very similar to the one required by SB 1200  
          (Hancock), Chapter 654, Statutes of 2012, for the revising of  
          standards in mathematics and science.  In both of those content  
          areas, state standards were updated to align with national  








                                                                    AB 2862


                                                                    Page  5





          standards (Common Core State Standards in mathematics, and the  
          Next Generation Science Standards).  That bill authorized the  
          SPI to consult with a group of experts and to recommend revised  
          standards to the SBE.  The SBE was authorized to adopt, reject,  
          or modify the standards, and was required to provide a written  
          explanation for any modifications.  




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Tanya Lieberman / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN: 0003329