BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2873 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 19, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Mark Stone, Chair AB 2873 (Thurmond) - As Amended March 18, 2016 As Proposed to be Amended SUBJECT: Certified access specialistS KEY ISSUES: 1)SHOULD ADDITIONAL FUNDS BE MADE AVAILABLE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN ORDER TO TRAIN AND CERTIFY ADDITIONAL CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALISTS WHOSE SERVICES ARE BENEFICIAL TO BOTH SMALL BUSINESSES AND THE DISABLED COMMUNITY, PAID FOR BY HIGHER BUSINESS LICENSE FEES? 2)SHOULD ALL OF THE BUILDING INSPECTORS EMPLOYED BY LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENTS WHO CONDUCT PERMITTING AND PLAN CHECK SERVICES TO BUSINESSES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS BE REQUIRED, AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018, TO BE CASP-CERTIFIED? SYNOPSIS Under the twenty-five year-old federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a business that constitutes a place of public accommodation (e.g., many places of lodging, AB 2873 Page 2 entertainment, recreation, restaurants, bars, theaters, stores, health clubs, etc.) is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of disability if its operations affect interstate commerce. In 1992, shortly after passage of the ADA, the Legislature amended the state's disability protections 'to strengthen California law in areas where it is weaker than the ADA and to retain California law when it provides more protection for individuals with disabilities than the ADA. Therefore, since 1992, public accommodations in California have been required to comply with not only the ADA, but also with the state's Unruh Act, which incorporates the ADA into its provisions and makes a violation of the ADA punishable as a violation of Unruh. Compliance, something disabled consumers should be able to count on as they go about their daily lives, also has the added benefit to businesses of helping them to avoid ADA litigation. One significant way to increase compliance is the Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program. In 2003, Senate Bill 262 (Kuehl, Chapter 872, Statutes of 2003) created the CASp program to meet the public's need for experienced, trained, and tested individuals who can inspect buildings and sites for compliance with applicable state and federal construction-related accessibility standards. Since then, a number of bills have expanded the use and effect of CASp inspections. However, no significant new financial resources have been provided to small businesses or to the CASp program, in order to bring businesses into compliance with the law. As proposed to be amended, this bill seeks to expand the availability of CASp-certified building inspectors in order to increase compliance with state and federal construction-related accessibility standards, requiring that as of January 1, 2018, all building inspectors employed or retained by a local agency who conduct permitting and plan check services to review for AB 2873 Page 3 compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects relating to tenant improvements that may impact access shall be certified access specialists. It provides funding to local governments to either hire more CASps, or to allow existing staff to become certified, by increasing the fee on business licenses that is used to fund the CASp Program from one dollar to four dollars, and specifying that most of the additional funds are retained by local governments and deposited into a special CASp fund. This bill is sponsored by Disability Rights California and supported by the Consumer Attorneys of California. It has no opposition on file. SUMMARY: Seeks to expand the availability of CASp-certified building inspectors in order to increase compliance with state and federal construction-related accessibility standards. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires, as of January 1, 2018, that all building inspectors employed or retained by a local agency who conduct permitting and plan check services to review for compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects relating to tenant improvements that may impact access shall be certified access specialists. 2)Eliminates the provision in existing law that if a local agency employs or retains two or more certified access specialists, at least half of them are required to be building inspectors who are certified access specialists. 3)Raises the fee on business licenses that is used to fund the CASp Program from one dollar to four dollars. AB 2873 Page 4 4)Provides that instead of retaining 70 percent of the business license fee and sending 30 percent to the Division of the State Architect (DSA), the local government would keep 90 percent of the funds and provide 10 percent to the DSA. 5)Requires that any funds collected by the local government would be deposited into a "CASp Certification and Training Fund." EXISTING LAW: 1) Provides for a California Commission on Disability Access, an independent state agency composed of 17 members, with the general responsibility for monitoring disability access compliance in California, and the authority to hold hearings and make recommendations to the Legislature for necessary changes to existing state law in order to facilitate implementation of state and federal laws on disability access. (Gov. Code Sec. 8299 et seq. All further statutory references are to the Government Code, unless otherwise indicated.) 2)Requires the Commission to use its funding, as appropriate, to provide information about preventing or minimizing compliance problems among California businesses, and recommending programs to enable persons with disabilities to obtain full and equal access to public facilities. (Section 8299.05.) 3)Makes it a priority for the Commission to provide educational resources to promote and facilitate disability access AB 2873 Page 5 compliance. (Section 8299.06.) 4)Provides for the certification process in which an applicant may become a certified-access specialist. Further provides that the DSA shall require each applicant to pay fees that are reasonably necessary to implement the certified access specialist program, including processing, registration, and publishing a list of certified access specialists. (Section 4459.8.) 5)Requires a commercial property owner to state on a lease form or rental agreement executed on or after July 1, 2013, if the property being leased or rented has undergone inspection by a certified access specialist. If the property has undergone an inspection, the commercial property owner shall state whether the property has or has not been determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards. (Civil Code Section 1938.) 6)Requires a local agency to employ or retain a sufficient number of building inspectors who are CASp-certified to conduct permitting and plan check services to review for compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects relating to tenant improvements that may impact access and specifies that if a local agency employs or retains two or more certified access specialists to comply with this subdivision, at least one-half of the certified access specialists shall be building inspectors who are certified access specialists. (Civil Code Section 55.53 (d)(2).) FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal. AB 2873 Page 6 COMMENTS: Under the twenty-five year-old federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a business that constitutes a place of public accommodation (e.g., many places of lodging, entertainment, recreation, restaurants, bars, theaters, stores, health clubs, etc.) is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of disability if its operations affect interstate commerce. Prohibited discrimination can take a number of forms - e.g., denial of participation in the facility, or a service, benefit, or good of the business; denial of equal participation in a good, service, or facility; or provision of a different or separate facility, service or good (unless necessary to provide services and are as effective as that provided to others). Government facilities are also covered by the access obligations of the ADA. According to the California Supreme Court, "In 1992, shortly after passage of the ADA, the Legislature amended the state's disability protections 'to strengthen California law in areas where it is weaker than the [ADA] and to retain California law when it provides more protection for individuals with disabilities than the [ADA].' Two overlapping laws, the Unruh Civil Rights Act (§ 51) and the Disabled Persons Act (§§ 54-55.3), are the principal sources of state disability access protection." (Jankey v. Lee (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1038, 1044 [Citation to internal quotation deleted].) As a result of incorporating the ADA into the state's Unruh Civil Rights, a plaintiff who prevails in a construction-related accessibility claim, like all plaintiffs in other civil rights cases, is entitled to minimum statutory damages of $4,000 per violation (although later amendments to Unruh, affecting only disabled plaintiffs in only construction-related disability claims, reduced the minimum statutory damages to only $1,000 in some cases, such as when a small business previously obtained a CASp inspection). Therefore, since 1992, public accommodations in California have been required to comply with not only the ADA, but also with the AB 2873 Page 7 state's Unruh Act, which incorporates the ADA into its provisions and makes a violation of the ADA punishable as a violation of Unruh. (Section 51.) All violations of Unruh are subject to statutory damages of at least $4,000 per violation, except some cases where the violation is based on a construction-related accessibility claim, in which case lower damages (a minimum of $1,000, or $2,000, depending on the circumstances of the case) apply. Efforts by the Legislature to Help Businesses Comply with Construction-related Accessibility Standards. For years, there has been widespread media coverage about the problem of what has been described as "serial ADA litigation." But it is also important to put these figures into perspective. According to data compiled by the Commission, from January 2014 until January 2015, there were 3,468 demand letters and complaints sent or filed in the state. In contrast, according to the Judicial Council of California, a total of 800,091 lawsuits were filed in the state in 2013 (the most recent year available). Meanwhile, California has approximately 3.3 million small businesses. These figures mean that less than one percent of small businesses (and a far smaller percentage of all businesses) were sued in 2014 for access violations; and the 3,468 demand letters or complaints regarding accessibility violations represent less than one-half of one percent (.43%) of the total number of lawsuits filed in the state. And the actual percentage is even smaller, because the Commission figure includes demand letters that are not complaints. In response to this problem - both real and perceived - small businesses are justifiably fearful and angry about being sued, while disabled consumers are viewed with blame or suspicion, even though they have a right to full and equal access and should be able to expect all public accommodations to comply with the 25-year old requirements of the Americans with Disability Act. Disabled consumers just want to go about their daily lives without difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment, AB 2873 Page 8 and with the basic dignity that comes from being able to go to the same places and have the same access to services as non-disabled persons. Compliance, something disabled consumers should be able to count on as they go about their daily lives, also has the added benefit to businesses of helping them to avoid ADA litigation. One significant way to increase compliance is the Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program. In 2003, Senate Bill 262 (Kuehl, Chapter 872, Statutes of 2003) created the CASp program to meet the public's need for experienced, trained, and tested individuals who can inspect buildings and sites for compliance with applicable state and federal construction-related accessibility standards. Five years later, Senate Bill 1608 (Corbett et al., Chapter 549, Statutes of 2008), among other things, provided for an early evaluation of a filed complaint if the defendant is a qualified defendant who had the identified place of public accommodation inspected and determined to meet applicable physical access standards by a CASp prior to the filing of the complaint. And four years after that, Senate Bill 1186 (Steinberg, Chapter 383, Statutes of 2012) required a one-dollar additional fee to be paid by any applicant for a local business license, permit or similar instrument when it is issued or renewed. The fee applies to applications and renewals filed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 and it is collected by the issuing jurisdiction (city, county, or city and county). The purpose of the fee is to increase disability access and compliance with construction-related accessibility requirements. Additionally, the fee assists local jurisdictions in supporting the CASp program and provides the State Architect with funds to maintain oversight of the CASp program. The funds accrued from this fee are then divided between the local entity that collected the funds, which retains 70 percent, and DSA, which receives 30 percent. More recently, this Committee also approved a number of measures (including AB 269 (Roth and Vidak), AB 2093 (Steinorth), and AB AB 2873 Page 9 1230 (Gomez)) that provide relief from minimum statutory damages, information and financial resources to bring their premises into compliance with the law. Disabled advocates rightfully feel that they have cooperated with the authors of many of these measures and begrudgingly gone along with incremental erosion of their rights with the hope of seeing greater compliance with the ADA, partially facilitated by tax credits and other financial incentives to small businesses (many of which have been vetoed in recent years). However, no significant new financial resources have been provided to small businesses or to the CASp program, in order to bring businesses into compliance with the law. According to Disability Access California, the sponsor of AB 2873, "this bill is a step in the right direction to ensure equal access to people with disabilities." New Requirements on Local Building Departments. Under current law, the Division of the State Architect (DSA) certifies applicants to become CASps. The DSA publishes a list of all the CASps in the state on its website. Currently, there are over 575 CASps throughout the state. This bill requires, as of January 1, 2018, that all building inspectors employed or retained by a local agency who conduct permitting and plan check services to review for compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects relating to tenant improvements that may impact access shall be certified access specialists. In order to compensate for the increased costs to local building departments, the bill proposes to raise the fee on business licenses that is used to fund the CASp Program from one dollar to four dollars. Instead of retaining 70 percent of the business license fee and sending 30 percent to the DSA, the local government would keep 90 percent of the funds and provide 10 percent to the DSA. Because of the increased fee, the funds going to DSA should be slightly greater under this bill than AB 2873 Page 10 they are under current law. Given the higher workload that would be necessitated by this bill, as well as additional duties imposed upon DSA by recent legislation (described below), this seems appropriate. More significantly, this bill seeks to increase the funds going to local agencies and to provide a mechanism for tracking those funds, by requiring them to be deposited into newly created local "CASp Certification and Training Fund(s)." Given that building departments will have to expend greater resources to ensure that all building inspectors involved in the plan check and construction inspection process of commercial businesses are CASp-certified, this fee seems both appropriate and beneficial. It is hoped that this measure, though it does not include a tax credit or other specific financial benefit to business owners, will nevertheless improve compliance by commercial establishments with the law for the benefit of both the businesses, as well as their disabled customers. Author's Statement. The author writes the following to explain the need for the bill: AB 2873 provides more resources to increase business compliance with state and federal access laws and ensures equal access to businesses by the disability community. This bill collects a $4 fee on business licenses and renewals, so that the increased dollars can be used by local governments for CASp-certification and training of all local building inspectors. The bill also expands CASp training, testing and certification to include federal subsidized housing accessibility requirements (which are not currently covered by the test.) As California grows, and as construction increases statewide, the CASp program needs to grow to meet to evaluate AB 2873 Page 11 accessibility. Public CASps play a crucial role in preventing accessibility violations; they provide permitting and plan check services for new construction, as well as renovations requiring permits. Budget reductions and insufficient funding/revenue prevents local governments from expanding CASp training and certification to other building inspectors. Some jurisdictions do not have CASp certified inspectors on staff. This results in backlog and a delay in ensuring access requirements are met so people with disabilities can fully participate in society. Author's Amendments. As reflected in this analysis, the author has agreed to extend the date of compliance for building departments to comply with the requirement that all building inspectors are CASp-certified from January 1, 2017 until January 1, 2018. Also, in order to clarify that the requirement for building inspectors to be CASp-certified only applies to those inspectors "who conduct permitting and plan check services", the author has agreed to the following minor clarifying amendments: On Page 5, at line 30, strike out: "shall be certified access specialists" On Page 5, at line 35, after "access" insert: "shall be certified access specialists" ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The Consumer Attorneys of California write the following in support of AB 2873: AB 2873 will increase access for people with disabilities by requiring, commencing January 1, 2017, that all building AB 2873 Page 12 inspectors employed or retained by a local agency be certified access specialists. To accomplish this, the bill collects a $4 fee on business licenses and renewals, so that the increase dollars can be used by local governments for the CASp-certification of all local building inspectors. It doesn't make any sense, for either the business nor those who want or need to access a building, that a building inspector can sign off on a business inspection when the inspector doesn't know the legal requirements for accessibility standards. AB 2873 is a step in the right direction to ensure that businesses can comply with the law and that all can enter those businesses, regardless of disability. SIMILAR RECENT LEGISLATION: AB 1230 ((Gomez), Chapter 787, Statutes of 2015) establishes the California Americans With Disabilities Act Small Business Capital Access Loan Program within the California Capital Access Loan Program in order to create a self-sustaining program to provide loans to assist small businesses in financing the costs of projects that alter or retrofit existing small business facilities according to certain criteria, to comply with the ADA. AB 1342 (Steinorth, 2015) would have required, among other things, the State Architect to require a CASp applicant to provide the location (i.e. city, county, or city and county) in which the CASp will provide services and the State Architect to post the location that each CASp provides or intends to provide services. AB 1342 was vetoed. AB 1468 (Baker, 2015) would have, among other things, provided that a public entity's possession of a close out letter from the State Architect certifying that the buildings, facilities, and other places meet the applicable construction-related AB 2873 Page 13 accessibility standards of the ADA, serves as presumptive evidence of compliance with the ADA. This bill died without a hearing in this Committee. AB 2093 (Steinorth, 2016) requires applicants for CASp certification or renewal to additionally provide to the State Architect the name of the city, county, or city and county in which the applicant intends to provide or has provided services, and requires the State Architect to post that information on his or her Internet Web site. It also requires landlords to provide CASp reports to tenants under certain circumstances and to correct any access violations, unless the landlord and tenant agree otherwise. This bill sits on the Assembly Floor consent calendar. SB 251 (Roth, 2015) would have, among other things, protected a business with 100 or fewer employees from liability for minimum statutory damages for violations of construction-related accessibility standards during the 120 day period after the business obtained a CASp inspection of the business and corrected violations noted in the inspection. It also required the State Architect to publish and regularly update a list of businesses that have filed a notice with the State Architect stating that the business has obtained a CASp inspection and will correct any violations of accessibility standards within 120 days of the date of the inspection. This bill was vetoed. SB 269 (Roth and Vidak) is virtually identical to SB 251, but its provision protecting a business that has obtained a CASp inspection from liability for minimum statutory damages for 120 days only applies to a business with 50 or fewer employees. Like SB 251, it requires the State Architect to publish and regularly update the same list of businesses that have obtained a CASp inspection and will correct any violations of accessibility standards. This bill is pending on the Assembly Floor. AB 2873 Page 14 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Disability Rights California (sponsor) Consumer Attorneys of California Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Alison Merrilees / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 AB 2873 Page 15