BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 2888 (Low) - Sex crimes:  mandatory prison sentence
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: August 2, 2016         |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 6 - 0      |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 8, 2016    |Consultant: Jolie Onodera       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 

          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 2888 would prohibit a court from granting probation  
          or suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence if a  
          person is convicted of rape, sodomy, penetration with a foreign  
          object, or oral copulation if the victim was either unconscious  
          or incapable of giving consent due to intoxication.


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
            State prisons  :  Potentially significant ongoing increase in  
            state incarceration costs (General Fund) for new commitments  
            to state prison that otherwise may have been granted probation  
            or suspension of imposition of a felony sentence. CDCR data  
            indicates nearly 100 new commitments to state prison in 2015  
            under the specified provisions of this measure. However, the  
            number of individuals granted probation in lieu of a prison  
            sentence for these offenses that may be impacted by this bill  
            is unknown. For context, for every five percent increase in  
            annual commitments to state prison under the specified  
            provisions of law, annual state incarceration costs would  
            increase by $145,000 in the first year, cumulatively  







          AB 2888 (Low)                                          Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
            increasing for overlapping sentences.
            State parole  :  Potential increase in future parole supervision  
            costs for persons released from state prison for a rape  
            conviction pursuant to PC § 261(a)(3) or PC § 261(a)(4). All  
            categories of rape under existing law are considered "serious  
            felonies" pursuant to PC § 1192.7(c), and therefore, subject  
            to parole supervision upon release from state prison. 
            County supervision  :  Unquantifiable net local agency  
            supervision costs (Local Funds) consisting of potential cost  
            savings for persons released onto state parole for rape  
            convictions in lieu of probation, offset by increased costs  
            for postrelease community supervision (PRCS) for persons that  
            otherwise would have been granted probation.  


          Background:  Existing law prohibits a court from granting probation or  
          suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence if a person  
          is convicted of any of the following offenses: 
                 Forcible sexual intercourse (Penal Code (PC) §  
               261(a)(2), (a)(6).); 
                 In concert sexual assault (PC § 264.1.); 

                 Pimping and pandering (PC §§ 266h, 266i.); 

                 Procuring or obtaining a minor under the age of 16 for a  
               lewd and lascivious act (PC § 266j); 

                 Aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 (PC §  
               269.); 

                 Forcible or in concert sodomy (PC § 286 (c)(2), (c)(3),  
               (d).); 

                 Forcible or in concert oral copulation (PC §  
               288a(c)(2),(c)(3), (d).); 

                 Sexual intercourse or sodomy of a child 10 or younger  
               (PC § 288.7.); 

                 Forcible foreign object sexual penetration (PC §  
               289(a).); or 

                 Making child pornography (PC § 311.4 (b).). 









          AB 2888 (Low)                                          Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          (PC § 1203.065 (a).)

          Existing law provides that except in unusual cases where the  
          interests of justice would best be served if the person is  
          granted probation, probation shall not be granted to any person  
          who is convicted of the following offenses:

                 Rape by threat of use of public official authority (PC §  
               261 (a)(7).); 

                 Sodomy by threat of use of public official authority (PC  
               § 286 (k).); 

                 Oral copulation by threat of use of public official  
               authority (PC § 288a (k).);

                 Foreign object sexual penetration by threat of use of  
               public official authority (PC § 289 (g).); or 

                 Assault with intent to commit a specified sexual offense  
               (PC § 220.). 
          (PC § 1203.065 (b)(1).)


          Under existing law, if probation is granted under the  
          aforementioned unusual cases, the court is required to specify  
          on the record and enter on the minutes the circumstances  
          indicating that the interests of justice would best be served by  
          the disposition. (PC § 1203.065 (b)(2).)


          This bill appears to have been prompted in response to the  
          recent case involving a Stanford University student convicted on  
          three felony counts of sexual assault of an intoxicated and  
          unconscious woman. In this case, the defendant was sentenced to  
          six months in county jail and three years' probation. This bill  
          seeks to remove judicial discretion and prohibit the granting of  
          probation or suspending execution of a sentence for felony  
          convictions for specified sexual offenses.  




          Proposed Law:  








          AB 2888 (Low)                                          Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
           This bill would prohibit the court from granting probation or  
          suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence if a person  
          is convicted of any of the following sex offenses:
                 Forcible sexual intercourse where the victim is  
               prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic  
               substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition  
               was known, or reasonably should have been known by the  
               accused (PC § 261 (a)(3).); 

                 Forcible sexual intercourse where the victim is at the  
               time unconscious of the nature of the act, and this is  
               known to the accused (PC § 261 (a)(4).); 

                 Sodomy where the victim is at the time unconscious of  
               the nature of the act and this is known to the person  
               committing the act (PC § 286 (f).); 

                 Sodomy where the victim is prevented from resisting by  
               an intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled  
               substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably  
               should have been known by the accused (PC § 286 (i).); 

                 Oral copulation where the victim is at the time  
               unconscious of the nature of the act and this is known to  
               the person committing the act (PC § 288a (f).); 

                 Oral copulation where the victim is prevented from  
               resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or  
               any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or  
               reasonably should have been known by the accused (PC § 288a  
               (i).); 

                 Foreign object sexual penetration when the victim  
               submits under the belief that the person committing the act  
               or causing the act to be committed is someone known to the  
               victim other than the accused, and this belief is induced  
               by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the  
               accused (PC § 289 (d).); 
                 Foreign object sexual penetration when the victim is  
               prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic  
               substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition  
               was known, or reasonably should have been known by the  
               accused (PC § 289 (e).).









          AB 2888 (Low)                                          Page 4 of  
          ?
          
          


          Related  
          Legislation:  AB 701 (C. Garcia) 2016 would legislatively  
          declare that all forms of nonconsensual sexual assault may be  
          considered rape for purposes of the gravity of the offense and  
          the support of survivors. This bill is pending a vote on the  
          Senate Floor.


          Staff  
          Comments:  By prohibiting a court from granting probation or  
          suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence, this bill  
          could result in significant ongoing costs for new commitments to  
          state prison, as well as increased state parole supervision  
          costs for specified cases.
          Data from the CDCR indicates nearly 100 new commitments to state  
          prison in 2015 for the offenses specified in this measure. Based  
          on historical prison releases for these specified sex offenses,  
          the average length of stay in state prison is slightly greater  
          than 30 months. Although the number of new commitments entering  
          state prison each year for the specified offenses is known, the  
          annual number of defendants convicted of the specified sex  
          offenses who have been granted probation or suspension of the  
          execution of their sentences is unknown. As a result, the number  
          of potential new commitments to state prison is also unknown. To  
          the extent the number of commitments to state prison increases  
          by five percent, or five defendants per year, annual costs could  
          increase by $145,000 in the first year, cumulatively increasing  
          each year for overlapping sentences. 




                                      -- END --