BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2895 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 20, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Roger Hernández, Chair AB 2895 (Roger Hernández) - As Amended April 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Employee safety: injury prevention programs SUMMARY: Provides for employee access to written injury and illness prevention programs (IIPPs), as specified. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires an employer to keep an up-to-date complete copy of the written IIPP at each worksite, and make it available for inspection by any current employee or by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) upon an oral request. The worksite copy shall be in English, and, if the language spoken by the majority of the employees at the worksite is not English, the worksite copy shall also be in the language spoken by the majority of the employees at the worksite. 2)Requires an employer to provide a complete copy of the written IIPP to each current employee, and to new employees at the time of hire. The copy of the written IIPP shall be in English or, if the language spoken by the majority of the employees at the worksite is not English, an employee shall be provided with a copy in the language spoken by the majority of the employees at the worksite. If the written plan exceeds 50 AB 2895 Page 2 pages, the employer shall provide a summary. 3)Requires an employer who receives a written request for a complete copy of the written IIPP from a current employee, or his or her authorized representative, shall comply with the request as soon as practicable, but no later than five business days from the date a request is received. The copy of the records shall be provided to the current employee, or to his or her authorized representative, at no cost. 4)Provides that a failure by an employer to comply with a written request for a copy of the IIPP entitles an employee to recover a seven-hundred-fifty-dollar ($750) penalty from the employer. 5)Provides that these requirements shall be effective on July 1, 2017. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires employers to establish, implement, and maintain an effective IIPP. 2)Provides that the program shall be written, except as specified, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements: a) Identification of the person or persons responsible for implementing the program. b) The employer's system for identifying and evaluating AB 2895 Page 3 workplace hazards, including scheduled periodic inspections to identify unsafe conditions and work practices. c) The employer's methods and procedures for correcting unsafe or unhealthy conditions and work practices in a timely manner. d) An occupational health and safety training program designed to instruct employees in general safe and healthy work practices and to provide specific instruction with respect to hazards specific to each employee's job assignment. e) The employer's system for communicating with employees on occupational health and safety matters, including provisions designed to encourage employees to inform the employer of hazards at the worksite without fear of reprisal. f) The employer's system for ensuring that employees comply with safe and healthy work practices, which may include disciplinary action. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: An injury or illness prevention program (IIPP) is a basic written workplace safety program. California law requires every employer to develop and implement an effective IIPP. The specific elements of a written IIPP are set forth in the Labor Code and the Cal/OSHA regulations and include the following: Responsibility AB 2895 Page 4 Compliance Communication Hazard Assessment Accident/Exposure Investigation Hazard Correction Training and Instruction Recordkeeping According to Cal/OSHA, in order to effective, an IIPP must fully involve all employees, supervisors, and management, identify the specific workplace hazards employees are exposed to, correct identified hazards in an appropriate and timely manner, and provide effective training Three model IIPPs are available from Cal/OSHA. They are: CS 1A - Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention Model Program for High Hazard Employers CS 1B - Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention Model Program for Non-High Hazard Employers CS 1C - Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention Model Program for Employers with Intermittent Workers AB 2895 Page 5 There are no requirements to use these model programs. However, any employer in an industry which has been determined by Cal/ OSHA as being non-high hazard and who adopts, posts, and implements the Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention Model Program for Non-High Hazard Employers in good faith is not subject to assessment of a civil penalty for a first violation of the requirement to maintain an IIPP. On November 19, 2015, this committee conducted an informational hearing entitled, "Latino Worker Health and Safety Issues: Exploring Causes and Potential Solutions." Among other things, the hearing sought to explore some of the challenges experienced by Latino workers in greater detail, and to identify policy and other recommendations to address these concerns and improve workplace health and safety for Latino workers. Several witnesses at the hearing testified that many Latino workers, particularly immigrants, lack a basic understanding of workplace health and safety issues and particular hazards at their place of employment. Arguments in Support This bill is sponsored by the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (CRLAF) who argues that it will amend the current law related to IIPPs to add 'worker right to know' provisions that likely will operate to prevent future workplace injuries, illnesses and deaths, especially among California's vulnerable low-wage and immigrant workers. The bill addresses several issues which are absent in current IIPP law. CRLAF argues that, in general, the purpose of requiring AB 2895 Page 6 employers to have an IIPP is to help them to provide better workplace protection for their employees, and to reduce losses resulting from accidents and injuries. However, current IIPP law does not provide non-English speaking workers with a meaningful 'right to know' the hazards at any given worksite because employers are not even required to have IIPPs at worksites, and there is no requirement that the IIPP be in any other language even if a majority of the workers speak a language other than English. Therefore, this bill addresses several of the important ways that California's IIPP law has failed to keep pace with the changing realities of the workplace--and particularly with respect to the large number of workers who speak languages other than English--by giving them access to potentially key information at the work site and when they are hired. The sponsor notes that this bill goes into effect on July 1, 2017, which will give both employers and Cal/OSHA ample time to come into compliance with the modest new requirements established by the bill. Arguments in Opposition Opponents, including the California Chamber of Commerce, argue that the information required to be provided will be of no use to employees because it consists primarily of the operational and logistical details of the employer's plan. They contend AB 2895 Page 7 that the provision of these documents is unnecessary. Employers are required to establish and maintain an IIPP that includes specified information. Moreover, implementation of an IIPP requires employers to provide information to employees at critical times regarding working safely through communication and training. Providing a paper copy of the program itself to all employees is simply redundant. Furthermore, while companies strive to be good "green" citizens, producing massive amounts of paper with little to no benefit is counterproductive to the "green goals" of the state. In addition, opponents argue that Cal/OSHA enforces all Cal/OSHA regulations and has a penalty scheme for violations. The imposition of a new penalty issued outside of the current Cal/OSHA enforcement system could create double jeopardy for the employer, with a possible citation and fine from the division as well as a windfall to the employee directly from the employer for a paperwork violation. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: AB 2895 Page 8 Support California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (sponsor) National Employment Law Project SoCalCOSH United Farm Workers Worksafe Opposition Associated Builders and Contractors of California Associated General Contractors California Apartment Association California Association of Health Services at Home AB 2895 Page 9 California Attractions and Parks Association California Chamber of Commerce California Construction and Industrial Materials Association California Cotton Ginners Association California Cotton Growers Association California Farm Bureau Federation California Framing Contractors Association California Grocers Association California League of Food Processors California Manufacturers & Technology Association California Professional Association of Specialty Contractors California Retailers Association Family Business Association of California AB 2895 Page 10 National Federation of Independent Business Public Agency Safety Management Association Residential Contractors Association Walter & Prince, LLP Western Agricultural Processors Association Western Carwash Association Western Growers Association Analysis Prepared by:Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 AB 2895 Page 11