BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2899


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 18, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          2899 (Roger Hernández) - As Amended May 4, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Labor and Employment           |Vote:|6 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill establishes a wage bond requirement for the filing of  
          a writ of mandate with the superior court by an employer  
          challenging a citation and decision by the Labor Commissioner  
          finding a violation of the law.  Specifically, this bill:


          1)Requires, as a condition to filing a petition for a writ of  
            mandate, the employer seeking the writ to first post a bond  








                                                                    AB 2899


                                                                    Page  2





            with the Labor Commissioner equal to the total amount of any  
            minimum wages, liquidated damages, and overtime compensation  
            that are due and owing as specified in the citation being  
            challenged.  Specifies the bond amount cannot include amounts  
            for penalties. 


          2)Requires the bond to be issued by a surety duly authorized to  
            do business in this state, to be issued in favor of unpaid  
            employees, and ensures that the employer makes payments as  
            specified.


          3)Specifies, if the employer fails to pay money owed, within 10  
            days of an entry of judgement, dismissal or withdrawal of  
            writ, or pursuant to a settlement agreement, the amount owed  
            to the employee shall be paid from the bond. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          No significant fiscal impact to the Department of Industrial  
          Relations. 


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. This bill establishes an "appeal bond" requirement  
            for an employer who seeks a writ of mandate challenging a  
            decision of the Labor Commissioner following a citation by the  
            Bureau of Field Enforcement (BOFE).  The bond established by  
            this bill is similar to a bond required of employers who  
            appeal an adverse decision following an employee wage claim  
            filed with the Labor Commissioner.


          2)Background. Statute was enacted in 2000, and later clarified  








                                                                    AB 2899


                                                                    Page  3





            in 2010, that an employer wishing to appeal a Labor  
            Commissioner decision with the superior court must first post  
            a bond in the amount of the judgment rendered in the  
            administrative hearing. This law was enacted in response to  
            complaints by some worker advocates that unscrupulous  
            employers, particularly those in the underground economy, were  
            filing "frivolous" appeals of Labor Commissioner decisions  
            with the superior court in an effort to drag out litigation  
            and hide assets so that workers would not be able to collect  
            on judgments, even if ultimately successful on appeal.


            The author is addressing similar concerns around writ of  
            mandate filings against a Labor Commissioner citations  
            (operating through BOFE). 


            Analysis Prepared by:Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916) 319-2081