BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      SB 24  


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   June 29, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          SB 24  
          (Hill) - As Amended January 5, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Public Employees,              |Vote:|6 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |Retirement/Soc Sec             |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill allows a joint powers authority (JPA), formed by the  
          Cities of Belmont, Foster City, and San Mateo, to provide  
          existing employees the retirement benefit they received from  
          their respective employer prior to the JPA's formation rather  








                                                                      SB 24  


                                                                    Page  2





          than the benefit required under the California Public Employees'  
          Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA). 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          One-time special fund costs to the California Public Employees'  
          Retirement System (CalPERS) of approximately $200,000 for  
          implementation and systems changes.


          COMMENTS:


          1)JPA and PEPRA. A JPA is the authority created by an agreement  
            between multiple public agencies to exercise powers common to  
            each of them for the purpose of accomplishing specific common  
            goals. A JPA can be used by agencies to share regional  
            responsibilities, such as fire services.


            Under PEPRA, new public agencies formed after January 1, 2013,  
            must use the new pension formulas for their employees. As a  
            result, current employees cannot be transferred into a JPA  
            without losing their benefits, even if no lapse in public  
            service or change in duties and responsibilities occur. 


          2)Purpose. This bill is intended to allow local agencies to  
            leverage the cost benefits and efficiency advantages a JPA can  
            offer without prejudice to existing employee pensions.  
            Specifically, the author contends that SB 23 will remove an  
            obstacle that prevents the cities of San Mateo, Belmont, and  
            Foster City from completing their Joint Powers Agreement for  
            shared fire service. 


          3)Related legislation. SB 1203 (Hertzberg) of 2016, currently  








                                                                      SB 24  


                                                                    Page  3





            pending in this committee, creates a blanket authorization for  
            JPAs to provide existing employees the retirement benefit they  
            were receiving prior to the formation of a JPA. Unlike SB 24,  
            SB 1203 is not specific to any city or group of cities. 





          Analysis Prepared by:Luke Reidenbach / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081