BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      SB 24


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          24 (Hill)


          As Amended  January 5, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  29-4


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Public          |6-0  |Waldron, Cooley,      |                    |
          |Employees       |     |Cooper, Cristina      |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, O'Donnell,    |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner                |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |19-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Daly, Eggman,         |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood,  |                    |
          |                |     |McCarty               |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |








                                                                      SB 24


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Allows a joint powers authority (JPA), formed by the  
          Cities of Belmont, Foster City, and San Mateo to provide  
          employees of those cities who move to the JPA the retirement  
          benefit that those employees received from their respective  
          employer prior to the JPAs formation rather than the benefit  
          required under the California Public Employees' Pension Reform  
          Act of 2013 (PEPRA).  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Allows a JPA formed by the Cities of Belmont, Foster City, and  
            San Mateo on or after January 1, 2013, to provide employees  
            the retirement formula that the employees received from their  
            respective city employer forming the JPA prior to the JPA's  
            formation.


          2)Provides that the employee must not be a new member of the  
            retirement system as defined by PEPRA and must be employed by  
            the JPA without a break in service from the employee's  
            respective city employer of more than 180 days.


          3)Prohibits the formation of a JPA on or after January 1, 2013,  
            in a manner that exempts a new member from the requirements of  
            PEPRA.  New members may only participate in a plan that  
            conforms to the requirements of PEPRA.


          4)Makes legislative findings and declarations that a special  
            law, rather than a general law, is needed to clarify the  
            benefits and eligibility rules under PEPRA and to maintain the  
            integrity of that act and further its purpose.


          EXISTING LAW:  








                                                                      SB 24


                                                                    Page  3







          1)Authorizes, under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, public  
            agencies to enter into agreements to jointly exercise any  
            power common to the contracting parties, including providing  
            for the creation of an agency or entity that is separate from  
            the parties to the agreement and is responsible for the  
            administration of the agreement.


          2)Allows local public employers forming a JPA to contract with  
            the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS)  
            to offer retirement benefits to their employees if the JPA  
            meets the federal definition of a governmental plan.  The JPA  
            is then a new contracting employer in the retirement system.


          3)Establishes, under PEPRA, a new retirement plan formula and  
            requires public employers to offer the PEPRA formula to new  
            employees first hired into public service after January 1,  
            2013, as defined.


          4)Requires pre-PEPRA members-referred to as "classic" members by  
            CalPERS - who were first hired into public service prior to  
            January 1, 2013, and who move between public employers within  
            a 180-day time period, to be grandfathered under pre-PEPRA  
            retirement formulas and eligible to receive the benefit plans  
            offered to employees of the public employer on December 31,  
            2012 (i.e., the benefit plan in place prior to PEPRA  
            implementation).


          5)Authorizes a JPA formed by the cities of Brea and Fullerton on  
            or after January 1, 2013, to provide employees who transfer to  
            the JPA from Brea or Fullerton with the "classic" retirement  
            formulas that the employees were receiving from their  
            respective employers within 180 days of the cities providing  
            for the exercise of the common power, to which the employee  








                                                                      SB 24


                                                                    Page  4





            was associated, by the JPA.


          6)Specifies that on or before January 1, 2017, up to three  
            cities in Orange County that are contiguous with Brea or  
            Fullerton may join the JPA and extend the same protections,  
            with regard to classic retirement formulas, to their  
            transferred employees and prohibits the formation of the JPA  
            in a manner that would exempt a new employee or member from  
            the requirements of PEPRA.  New members may only participate  
            in a plan that conforms to the requirements of PEPRA. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, one-time special fund costs to CalPERS of  
          approximately $200,000 for implementation and systems changes.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "SB 24 resolves a pension  
          obstacle that's preventing the cities of San Mateo, Belmont and  
          Foster City from completing their Joint Powers Agreement for  
          shared fire service.  It's identical to last year's bill by  
          Senator Huff that was signed into law to allow shared fire  
          service in the cities of Fullerton and Brea."


          Supporters state, "Our cities, over the past four years, have  
          successfully integrated our fire administration functions and  
          other fire services and are now positioned to consider fully  
          integrating all fire services.  A significant obstacle to full  
          integration of fire services is our current ability to transfer  
          existing fire employees to a new JPA without an interruption or  
          loss of their current defined benefit plans.  We are supporting  
          SB 24 because it resolves the defined benefit plan concerns of  
          our current fire employees and allows us to move forward with  
          consideration of a full integration of fire services for the  
          three cities."










                                                                      SB 24


                                                                    Page  5





          This bill is similar to SB 1251 (Huff), Chapter 757, Statutes of  
          2014, which created an exemption in PEPRA to allow classic  
          employees transferred to a new JPA formed by the cities of Brea  
          and Fullerton after January 1, 2013, to retain their classic  
          retirement benefits following transfer to and employment in the   
          JPA.


          SB 354 (Huff), Chapter 158, Statutes of 2015, clarified the time  
          period during which a CalPERS "classic" member who is employed  
          in the cities of Brea and Fullerton can transfer to a JPA formed  
          by those two cities and retain classic benefit formulas received  
          prior to the transfer.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Karon Green / P.E.,R., & S.S. / (916) 319-3957    
                                                                    FN:  
          0004002