BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session SB 33 (Hernandez) - Medi-Cal: estate recovery ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: April 6, 2015 |Policy Vote: HEALTH 8 - 0 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: May 11, 2015 |Consultant: Brendan McCarthy | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: SB 33 would limit the authority of the state to recover funds from the estate or survivors of a deceased Medi-Cal beneficiary. Fiscal Impact: Annual revenue loss up to $50 million per year in foregone claims on the estates of Medi-Cal beneficiaries who would have been eligible for Medi-Cal under the pre-Affordable Care Act expansion (50% General Fund, 50% federal funds). (See below for more detail.) Unknown future revenue loss from foregone claims on the SB 33 (Hernandez) Page 1 of ? estates of deceased Medi-Cal beneficiaries eligible under the Medi-Cal expansion beginning in 2017 (5 - 10% General Fund, 95 - 90% federal funds). Ongoing administrative costs of about $3 million per year to provide information to Medi-Cal beneficiaries on the costs that they have incurred and would be subject to estate recovery, upon request (General Fund and federal funds). One-time costs likely less than $100,000 to revise regulations by the Department of Health Care Services (50% General Fund, 50% federal funds). Background: Federal law requires state Medicaid programs (Medi-Cal in California) to make a claim against the estate of a deceased beneficiary to recover the costs of certain services provided to that beneficiary. Federal law requires states to recover the costs of health care services provided to beneficiaries of any age who are permanently institutionalized and the costs of nursing facilities, home and community based services, and related hospital and prescription drug costs for beneficiaries over 55 years of age. Federal law authorizes states to seek recovery for other health care services provided to beneficiaries over 55 years of age. Federal law allows states to define estate for the purposes of determining which assets to claim. Current state law requires the Department of Health Care Services to seek estate recovery for all health care services provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries over the age of 55. Estate recovery is prohibited during a surviving spouse's lifetime, when there is a surviving child under age 21, or if there is a surviving child of any age who is blind or disabled. Current law uses a definition of estate that is broader than current federal law requires. Proposed Law: SB 33 would limit the authority of the state to seek to recover costs from the estate or survivors of a deceased Medi-Cal beneficiary. Specific provisions of the bill would: Limit estate recovery to the costs incurred by Medi-Cal to SB 33 (Hernandez) Page 2 of ? pay for health care costs of permanently institutionalized beneficiaries of any age and the costs of providing nursing facility care, home and community based services, and related hospital and prescription drug benefits for beneficiaries over 55 years of age (i.e. the services for which federal law requires states to seek recovery); Prohibit estate recovery against the estate of a surviving spouse; Narrow the definition of estate for the purposes of asset recovery, in effect allowing assets conveyed through joint tenancy or survivorship to be exempt from estate recovery (e.g. revocable trusts); Require the Department to waive claims against a "homestead of modest value" as defined; Require the Department to provide information to Medi-Cal beneficiaries, upon request, about the actual expenditures made on their behalf (to allow beneficiaries to understand the claims against their estate the state will make upon their death). Related Legislation: SB 1124 (Hernandez, 2014) would have limited estate recovery in the Medi-Cal program. That bill was vetoed by Governor Brown. Staff comments: Over the last decade, the Department has collected between $50 million and $60 million per year from deceased beneficiaries' estates. This bill makes a variety of changes to the statutes governing that process. The most significant change is to the definition of estate, for the purpose of estate recovery. Under the new definition, the state would no longer be authorized to recover assets from an estate if assets were protected by certain trusts (for example, a revocable trust). According to the Department, about 65% of recoveries in recent years came from estates which would be exempt from asset recovery under the bill, chiefly due to the use of revocable trusts to protect assets, such as a home. In addition, the bill eliminates recovery from the estate of a surviving spouse or recovery against a homestead of modest value. According to the Department, in combination, these provisions would exempt about $43 million in annual recoveries from future recovery. SB 33 (Hernandez) Page 3 of ? The bill further limits asset recovery by limiting asset recovery to services for which federal law requires the state to seek recovery. Those services include services provided to individuals who are permanently institutionalized and services provided to individuals over age 55 receiving nursing facility services and/or home and community based services and related services. According to the Department, these changes (after accounting for the changes described above) would reduce asset recovery collections by about $8 million per year. This estimate of lost revenue is subject to more uncertainty, however. On average, the Department seeks recovery in amounts that greatly exceed average recoveries. The average claims is $94,000, whereas the average recovery is $15,000. In cases in which the claimed amount significantly exceeds the available assets, reducing the services for which estate recovery is allowed may not actually reduce recoveries. For example, if the state seeks $100,000 in recoveries from an estate, but the estate only has $25,000 in recoverable assets, then reducing the amount the state could seek to $50,000 would not actually reduce the amount the state actually recovers. The Department does not have enough detailed data to determine how often claims for services allowed for recovery under the bill exceed available estate resources, so it is difficult to determine what the actual impact of this provision of the bill will be. As part of its implementation of the Affordable Care Act, the state has expanded Medi-Cal coverage to childless adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level. Under current law, in future years, health care costs for members of this population over 55 years of age would be subject to estate recovery, including health care costs for which recovery is optional. Under this bill, the state will forego some of those revenues. The size of this impact is not known, as information about the cost to insure this population and the likelihood that there will be recoverable assets is not known at this time. It is important to note that for the Medi-Cal expansion population, the federal government will pay 100% of the cost at first, declining to 90% of costs over time. Any cost recovery made by the state from this population would largely be returned to the federal government. Therefore, the General Fund impact from eliminating some cost recovery from this population is SB 33 (Hernandez) Page 4 of ? limited. -- END --