BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                         SB 36|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 36
          Author:   Hernandez (D) and De León (D), et al.
          Amended:  9/4/15  
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE:  9-0, 4/8/15
           AYES:  Hernandez, Nguyen, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Nielsen,  
            Pan, Roth, Wolk

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 4/20/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE:  9-0, 9/11/15 (pursuant to Senate Rule  
            29.10)
           AYES:  Hernandez, Nguyen, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Nielsen,  
            Pan, Roth, Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR:  35-0, 4/27/15
           AYES:  Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,  
            Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hall, Hancock,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu,  
            McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen,  
            Pan, Roth, Runner, Stone, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hertzberg, Moorlach, Pavley, Vidak

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  Not available

           SUBJECT:   Medi-Cal: demonstration project


          SOURCE:    Author

          DIGEST:   This bill authorizes the Department of Health Care  
          Services (DHCS) to request one or more temporary waiver  
          extensions to continue the operation of, and the authorities  








                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  2



          provided under, the current "California Bridge to Reform  
          Demonstration," the state's Section 1115 Medicaid waiver. This  
          bill requires DHCS to extend and apply the existing hospital  
          payment methodologies and allocations on a state fiscal year,  
          annual, partial year, or other basis, to the extent permitted  
          under any approved temporary waiver extension, an approved  
          subsequent waiver, or as otherwise permitted under federal  
          Medicaid law.

          Assembly Amendments delete the Senate-approved dealing with a  
          new Section 1115 Medicaid waiver, with the exception of the  
          urgency clause, and instead insert the provisions described in  
          the summary above.

          ANALYSIS: 
          
          Existing law:

          1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by  
            DHCS and under which qualified low-income persons receive  
            health care benefits. 

          2)Establishes a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration project  
            under the Medi-Cal program until October 31, 2015 known as  
            California's Bridge to Reform, to implement specified  
            objectives, including better care coordination for Seniors and  
            Persons with Disabilities (SPDs) and maximization of  
            opportunities to reduce the number of uninsured individuals.

          3)Provides for payments under the Bridge to Reform under the  
            "Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act"  
            to designated public hospitals (DPHs are the approximately 20  
            University of California and county hospitals), and for  
            federal disproportionate share (DSH), payments to private  
            hospitals (referred to as "DSH replacement payments") and  
            non-designated public hospitals (NDPHs are district hospitals)  
            through October 1, 2015. These provisions:

             a)   Make DPHs eligible for cost-based fee-for-service  
               Medicaid funding using certified public expenditures (CPEs)  
               as the federal match, instead of state General Fund. DPHs  
               put up the nonfederal share of Medi-Cal fee-for-service  








                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  3



               payments used to draw down federal Medicaid matching funds,  
               and receive cost-based reimbursement, using CPEs to draw  
               down federal Medicaid matching funds;

             b)   Provide DSH payments to DPHs, using CPEs and  
               intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) to draw down federal DHS  
               funds;

             c)   Provide DSH payments to eligible non-designated public  
               hospitals (NDPHs are primarily district hospitals) meeting  
               DSH eligibility criteria, using state General Fund to draw  
               down federal DSH funds;

             d)   Provide for "DSH replacement payments" to private  
               hospitals meeting DSH eligibility criteria, using non-DSH  
               Medicaid funds and state General Fund as the fund source;

             e)   Make DPHs eligible for payments from the federally  
               funded Safety Net Care Pool (SNCP) for uncompensated care;  
               and,

             f)   Make DPHs eligible for payments from the federally  
               funded delivery system reform incentive pool (DSRIP), based  
               on the DPH's progress toward and achievement of milestones  
               and metrics established in its DSRIP proposal, funded by  
               federal funds and IGTs.

          This bill:

          1)Permits the director of DHCS to request one or more temporary  
            waiver extensions, as necessary to continue the operation of,  
            and the authorities provided under, the current "California  
            Bridge to Reform Demonstration" waiver until the approved  
            effective date of the next waiver, if DHCS has not received  
            adequate assurances from the federal Centers for Medicare and  
            Medicaid Services (CMS) before November 1, 2015, that DHCS's  
            application for a subsequent waiver is likely to be approved  
            with an effective date of November 1, 2015.

          2)Requires DHCS, after consulting with the affected DPHs, to  
            extend and apply the payment methodologies and allocations in  
            the existing "Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration  








                                                                      SB 36 
                                                                    Page  4



            Project Act" that are in effect under the current waiver, on a  
            state fiscal year, annual, partial year, or other basis.

          3)Requires the extension and application of the current payment  
            methodologies and allocations to be consistent with any  
            applicable implementing provisions of the Medi-Cal state plan  
            and requirements imposed by CMS. 

          4)Implements the provisions in 2) and 3) above to the extent  
            permitted under the terms of any approved temporary waiver  
            extension obtained by DHCS, an approved subsequent waiver, or  
            as otherwise permitted under federal Medicaid law.

          5)Permits DHCS to make payments on an interim basis, subject to  
            reconciliation to amounts payable under the payment and  
            allocation methodologies in any approved temporary extension  
            obtained by DHCS under this bill, or under an approved  
            subsequent waiver.

          6)Implements this bill only to the extent that any necessary  
            federal approvals are obtained and federal financial  
            participation is available and is not jeopardized.

          7)Requires, until July 1, 2016, in the event of a conflict  
            between the terms of any federally approved waiver extension  
            obtained by DHCS and the provisions of the "Medi-Cal  
            Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act," the terms  
            of the federally approved temporary extension to control.  
            Requires DHCS to provide notice of the conflict to the  
            appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature.

          8)Permits DHCS to implement, interpret, or make specific this  
            bill by means of all-county letters, plan letters, plan or  
            provider bulletins, or similar instructions without taking  
            regulatory action until July 1, 2016.

          9)Takes effect immediately as an urgency statute.

          Comments
          
          1)Author's statement. According to the author, this bill is  
            needed because the current Section 1115 Medicaid waiver known  








                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  5



            as California Bridge to Reform Waiver expires on October 31,  
            2015, but an agreement on a subsequent waiver have not been  
            agreed to by the state and the federal government, and an  
            agreement appears unlikely to be reached before the  
            Legislature adjourns on September 11, 2015 so that state law  
            could be amended to incorporate the new waiver-related funding  
            provisions. This two-part bill will bridge the gap between the  
            current waiver and the new waiver by allowing DHCS to request  
            one or more temporary waiver extensions, and by requiring DHCS  
            to extend and apply the current hospital payment methodologies  
            and allocations in effect under the current waiver on a state  
            fiscal year, annual, partial year, or other basis, to the  
            extent allowed by the federal government. The extension of the  
            current hospital financing methodologies would continue to  
            provide essential funding for safety net providers in the  
            event of a delay in completion of the next waiver and until  
            state hospital financing law is amended to determine the new  
            DSH and waiver-related funding provisions for private  
            hospitals, NDPHs and DPHs resulting from the next federal  
            Section 1115 Medicaid waiver.

          2)Bridge to Reform Waiver. California's existing Section 1115  
            "California Bridge to Reform Demonstration" Waiver is a  
            five-year demonstration of health care reform initiatives that  
            was projected to provide an additional $10 billion in federal  
            funds over the lifetime of the waiver. The waiver prepared the  
            state for successful implementation of health care reform  
            through an early expansion of Medicaid, and tested innovations  
            in health care support for safety net providers. California is  
            currently in the fourth year of this waiver, which began  
            November 1, 2010 and expires October 31, 2015. Under the  
            current waiver, California is required to submit an extension  
            request no later than six months prior to the expiration date  
            of the current demonstration. California also operates its  
            Medi-Cal managed care delivery system under this federal  
            waiver. The Bridge to Reform Waiver enabled California to:

             a)   Implement an early expansion of Medicaid to low-income  
               adults without minor children under the Patient Protection  
               and Affordable Care Act through the Low Income Health  
               Program, which enrolled 650,000 individuals;









                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  6



             b)   Require the mandatory enrollment of SPDs into Medi-Cal  
               managed care plans in specified counties;

             c)   Provide federal funding for delivery system reform and  
               uncompensated care in DPH systems (21 county and University  
               of California hospitals) through the DSRIP and SNCP; 

             d)   Provided federal funding for designated state health  
               care programs and workforce development programs related to  
               medically disadvantaged service areas;

             e)   Operate its Medi-Cal managed care program,  
               Community-Based Adult Services program, and seven county  
               Coordinated Care Initiative (under the Initiative,  
               individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medi-Cal  
               receive their Medi-Cal and Medicare benefits through one  
               health plan).

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          Unknown with latest amendments.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified9/8/15)




          Association of California Health Care Districts


          California Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems
          California Hospital Association
          California State Association of Counties
          District Hospital Leadership Forum


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified9/8/15)










                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  7



          None received

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:  The California Association of Public  
          Hospitals and Health Systems (CAPH) writes in support that there  
          is a chance wavier negotiations could extend beyond October 31,  
          2015 when the "Bridge to Reform" waiver expires. CAPH argues, in  
          the event of a delay, it is critical for the state to maintain  
          existing expenditure authority in order to ensure that funds can  
          continue to flow to public safety net providers. CAPH states  
          this bill includes two important provisions to allow for  
          continuity during these negotiations. These provisions grant  
          DHCS the authority to extend the existing waiver and make waiver  
          expenditures in the case of a delay, as many other states have  
          experienced delays in renewing their waivers due to the time it  
          can take the federal government to complete a Section 1115  
          waiver negotiation.  In addition, this bill requires the  
          continuation of existing hospital funding distribution  
          methodologies in the event of a delay. While waivers make  
          certain payment streams available, state law specifies how those  
          funds must be distributed amongst providers.  As such, if there  
          are any delays in renewing the waiver, there would be no new  
          guidance for how to distribute DSH and SNCP payments to public  
          and private hospitals, and SNCP payments to public hospitals.  
          This bill requires the continued distribution of DSH and SNCP  
          payments according to current methodologies in the event of a  
          delay, which is important to hospitals as the total federal  
          funding for these programs in the current waiver year is $1.2  
          billion in federal DSH funds and $236 million in federal SNCP  
          funds.


           

          Prepared by: Scott Bain / HEALTH / 
          9/11/15 19:32:06


                                   ****  END  ****


          









                                                                      SB 36  
                                                                    Page  8