BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          43 (Hernandez)


          As Amended  August 17, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  37-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Health          |17-1 |Bonta, Maienschein,   |Patterson           |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Burke,       |                    |
          |                |     |Chávez, Chiu, Gomez,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gonzalez, Roger       |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Lackey,    |                    |
          |                |     |Nazarian, Rodriguez,  |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Steinorth,  |                    |
          |                |     |Thurmond, Waldron,    |                    |
          |                |     |Wood                  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonta,         |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Nazarian, Eggman,     |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |








                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Jones, Quirk, Rendon, |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Updates California law related to the definition of  
          essential health benefits (EHBs) to make it consistent with  
          recent federal regulations under the Patient Protection and  
          Affordable Care Act (ACA).  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Updates existing law to reflect that, for plan years  
            commencing on or after January 1, 2017, the following :


             a)   The Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Small Group HMO 30  
               plan as offered during the first quarter of 2014 (rather  
               than 2012) is California's EHB benchmark.


             b)   For pediatric vision care, the Federal Employees Dental  
               and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP) as offered during the  
               first quarter of 2014 (rather than 2012) is California's  
               benchmark; and, 


             c)   For pediatric oral care, the dental benefit received by  
               children under Medi-Cal program as of 2014 is California's  
               benchmark.


          2)Replaces, for plan years commencing on or after January 1,  
            2016, the existing definition of "habilitative services" with  
            the federal definition, and prohibits, for plan years  
            commencing on or after January 1, 2017, limits on habilitative  
            and rehabilitative services and devices from being combined.
          3)Extends emergency regulation authority for the Department of  
            Managed Health Care (DMHC) and the California Department of  








                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  3





            Insurance (CDI) and makes this authority inoperative on July  
            1, 2018.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill results in:


          1)One-time costs of $150,000 to revise regulations and ensure  
            policy compliance by CDI (Insurance Fund).


          2)One-time costs of $350,000 to revise regulations and ensure  
            plan compliance by DMHC (Managed Care Fund).


          3)No anticipated impact to state health care program such as  
            Medi-Cal or California Public Employees' Retirement System  
            (CalPERS).  This bill's provisions make minor changes to  
            statute governing the individual and small group health care  
            markets, which do not include those programs.


          4)No cost to the state to provide subsidies for additional costs  
            to Covered California plans, due to the change to the  
            definition of habilitative services.  Recent federal guidance  
            indicates that states are not obligated to defray any  
            additional subsidy costs in health benefit exchanges due to a  
            change to the definition of habilitative services.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, in 2012, the Legislature  
          established California's benchmark EHB plan through a process  
          that recognized the importance of existing state-mandated  
          benefits incorporating as many state mandates as possible;  
          protecting California's commitment to reproductive services;  
          embracing the consumer-oriented regulatory framework in place at  
          DMHC; and maintaining affordability for consumers.  Using these  
          principles and through a process of comparison, SB 951 (Ed  








                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  4





          Hernandez), Chapter 866, Statutes of 2012, paired with AB 1453  
          (Monning), Chapter 854, Statutes of 2012, designated the Kaiser  
          Small Group health maintenance organization (HMO) to serve as  
          the state's benchmark plan.  The author states that, earlier  
          this year, the federal government issued new regulations  
          requiring states to update their EHBs based on 2014 benchmark  
          plans.  The new regulations also create a definition of  
          habilitative services and devices that is more generous than  
          California's current definition.  The author states that this  
          bill has been introduced to make statutory changes necessary to  
          conform to federal requirements.  


          Under the ACA, plans and policies sold in the individual and  
          small group markets are required to ensure coverage of EHBs,  
          which include items and services within the following 10  
          categories: ambulatory patient services; emergency services;  
          hospitalization; maternity and newborn care; mental health and  
          substance use disorder services, including behavioral health  
          treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative  
          services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and  
          wellness services and chronic disease management; and pediatric  
          services, including oral and vision care. 


          States have the flexibility to select a benchmark plan that  
          reflects the scope of services offered by a "typical employer  
          plan."  In 2012, the state selected the 2012 Kaiser Foundation  
          Health Small Group HMO 30 plan as the state's base benchmark  
          plan.  To supplement the base-benchmark plan in the areas of  
          pediatric vision and pediatric oral services, the state selected  
          the FEDVIP and CHIP (formerly referred to as the Healthy  
          Families Program (HFP)), respectively.


          Recent federal regulations require state to use 2014 plans to  
          define EHB, starting with the 2017 plan year.  This bill updates  
          the current Kaiser Small Group HMO 30 and FEDVIP benchmark plans  
          to the 2014 products.  Additionally, the 2012-13 state Budget  








                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  5





          required the transition of children enrolled in the HFP to the  
          Medi-Cal program.  As such, CHIP-eligible children are now  
          covered under Medi-Cal.  For the purposes of selection of the  
          state's CHIP program to supplement the base-benchmark plan,  
          dental benefits provided under the Medi-Cal program serves as  
          the benchmark for pediatric dental benefits.  This bill replaces  
          an outdated reference to HFP, with a reference to the Medi-Cal  
          program, with respect to pediatric dental benefits.  


          Supporters of the bill state that the current definition of EHBs  
          assure comprehensive health benefits, and assert that by  
          conforming to the federal definition of "habilitative services"  
          this bill will provide comprehensive habilitative services thus  
          helping get families and children the care they need.  


          The California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, orthotics and  
          prosthetics providers, and other provider and consumer  
          stakeholders support this bill, if amended, to select the Kaiser  
          CalPERS HMO for the state's EHB benchmark plan because it  
          provides a slightly broader benefit package that includes  
          coverage for hearing aids, infertility treatment, and certain  
          prosthetic and orthotic devices.


          There is no opposition on file.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Kelly Green / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  FN:  
          0001654













                                                                      SB 43


                                                                    Page  6