BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
                          Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair

          BILL NO:                    SBX2 6    
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |AUTHOR:        |Monning                                        |
          |---------------+-----------------------------------------------|
          |VERSION:       |July 16, 2015                                  |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |HEARING DATE:  |August 19,     |               |               |
          |               |2015           |               |               |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |CONSULTANT:    |Alma Perez-Schwab                              |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
           SUBJECT  :  Smoking in the workplace

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits smoking in owner-operated businesses and removes  
          specified exemptions in existing law that allow tobacco smoking  
          in certain workplaces. 
          
          Existing law:
          1)Establishes "smoke-free laws," which prohibit the smoking of  
            tobacco products in various places, including, but not limited  
            to, school campuses, public buildings, places of employment,  
            apartment buildings, day care facilities, retail food  
            facilities, health facilities, and vehicles when minors are  
            present, and makes a violation of some of the prohibitions  
            punishable by an infraction. 

          2)Prohibits employers from knowingly or intentionally permitting  
            the smoking of tobacco products in an enclosed space at a  
            place of employment.  

          3)Defines "enclosed space" as including lobbies, lounges,  
            waiting areas, elevators, stairwells, and restrooms that are a  
            structural part of the building and not specifically exempt. 

          4)Exempts the following from the workplace smoking prohibition:

               a)     Sixty-five percent of guestrooms in a hotel, motel,  
                 or similar lodging establishment.  
                b)     Hotel or motel lobbies that meet certain size  
                 requirements;  
                c)     Meeting and banquet rooms in hotels or motels,  
                 except as specified;  
                d)     Retail or wholesale tobacco shops and private  







          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 2 of ?
          
          
                 smokers' lounges, as defined;  
               e)     Warehouse facilities, as defined;  
                f)     Gaming clubs, bars and taverns;  
                g)     Private residences, except for those licensed as  
                 family day care homes;
               h)     Patient smoking areas in long-term health care  
                 facilities;  
                i)     Break rooms designated for smoking by an employer;  
                 and  
                j)     Employers with five or fewer employees.  
           
          1)Imposes an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $100  
            for a first violation, $200 for a second violation within one  
            year, and $500 for a third and each subsequent violation  
            within one year, for any violation of the indoor smoking  
            prohibition. 

          2)Requires local law enforcement agencies to enforce these  
            provisions, including local health departments, unless an  
            employer has been found guilty of three or more violations  
            which will require an investigation by the Division of  
            Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH).  

          3)Sets forth a uniform statewide standard for regulating the  
            smoking of tobacco products in enclosed places of employment  
            and shall supersede and render unnecessary the local enactment  
            or enforcement of local ordinances regulating the smoking of  
            tobacco products in enclosed places of employment. 

          4)Authorizes employers to prohibit smoking in enclosed places of  
            employment for any reason. 
           
           This bill:
          1)Expands on the workplace smoking prohibition by including  
            owner-operated businesses defined as a business having no  
            employees, independent contractors, or volunteers, in which  
            the owner-operator of the business is the only worker.

          2)Expands on the definition of "enclosed space" where smoking is  
            prohibited to include covered parking lots. 

          3)Modifies the exemption that currently allows smoking in 65% of  
            the guestroom accommodations in a hotel, motel, or similar  
            transient lodging establishment by reducing that amount to  
            20%. 








          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 3 of ?
          
          

          4)Eliminates several exemptions in law which currently allows  
            the smoking of tobacco products in certain work environments,  
            thereby prohibiting the smoking of tobacco products indoors at  
            the following locations:

               a)     Hotel or motel lobbies;
               b)     Meeting and banquet rooms in a hotel or motel;
               c)     Retail or wholesale tobacco shops and private  
                 smokers' lounges;
               d)     Warehouse facilities;
               e)     Gaming clubs;
               f)     Bars and taverns;
               g)     Employee break rooms; and,
               h)     Businesses of employers with a total of five or  
                 fewer employees.

          1)Deletes obsolete references to regulations that would have  
            permitted smoking at gaming clubs, bars and taverns had these  
            been adopted before January 1, 1998 by the Occupational Safety  
            and Health Standards Board if a safe level of exposure to  
            secondhand smoke were found that prevents anything other than  
            insignificant harmful effects to exposed employees. No such  
            regulations were ever adopted, this language is therefore  
            obsolete.

          FISCAL  
          EFFECT  :  This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal  
          committee.
           
          COMMENTS  :
          1)Author's statement.  According to the author, the evidence is  
            clear and undeniable that exposure to secondhand smoke in a  
            workplace puts employees at risk of severe health effects.  The US  
            Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that  
            secondhand smoke can cause severe health conditions in adults,  
            such as coronary heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, and serious  
            respiratory diseases. California was one of the first states to  
            enact a landmark employee-protection law that addressed exposure  
            to the harmful effects of secondhand smoke by prohibiting the  
            smoking of tobacco products in a place of employment. While most  
            Californians enjoy the benefits of this important workplace  
            protection, many employees are still subjected to secondhand smoke  
            exposure through the numerous exemptions written into the original  
            1994 law. The patrons who visit, and the employees who work in  








          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 4 of ?
          
          
            these unsafe work environments, are receiving unequal protection  
            under the law, so as long as these egregious exemptions remain. 

            This bill will eliminate the loopholes in California's smoke-free  
            workplace law, by prohibiting smoking in owner-operated  
            businesses, and eliminating the exemptions that allow the smoking  
            of tobacco products in hotel lobbies, tobacco shops, warehouse  
            facilities, and employee break rooms, and banquet and meeting  
            rooms in hotels.

           2) Health impacts of secondhand smoke. According to the U.S.  
             Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Surgeon  
             General, secondhand smoke exposure can cause harmful health  
             effects that include stroke, heart disease, heart attacks,  
             lung cancer, asthma and chronic respiratory problems, among  
             others. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classifies  
             secondhand smoke as a Class "A" human carcinogen (cancer  
             causing agent), the same class as asbestos.  The California  
             Air Resources Board has declared secondhand smoke to be a  
             toxic air contaminant, in the same category as diesel  
             exhaust. According to the Department of Public Health, (DPH)  
             nonsmokers who are frequently exposed to high levels of  
             secondhand smoke increase their risk of developing heart  
             disease by 25-30%, and lung cancer by 20-30%.  The U.S.  
             Surgeon General has concluded that there is no risk-free  
             level of exposure to secondhand smoke, ventilation cannot  
             eliminate exposure of nonsmokers to secondhand smoke, and  
             establishing smoke-free environments is the only proven way  
             to prevent exposure.  (The Health Consequences of Involuntary  
             Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General,  
             2006).  According to a 2014 report by the U.S. Surgeon  
             General, if smoking persists at the current rate among young  
             adults, 5.6 million of today's Americans younger than 18  
             years of age are projected to die prematurely from a  
             smoking-related illness. (The Health Consequences of Smoking  
             - 50 Years of Progress, 2014).  The 2014 report also finds  
             that the value of lost productivity due to premature deaths  
             caused by exposure to secondhand smoke is estimated to be  
             $5.6 billion per year ($150 billion productivity loss for  
             smoking deaths).  

          3)History of smoking in the workplace in California. For years  
            California had been the leader in the effort to fight the  
            smoking epidemic and was often referred to as "America's  
            Non-Smoking Section," a reputation that came about when  








          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 5 of ?
          
          
            California became the first state in the country to ban  
            smoking in nearly every workplace; effectively banning smoking  
            in indoor public spaces.  California's workplace smoking  
            prohibition was enacted by AB 13 (Friedman Chapter 310,  
            Statutes of 1994), Restaurants were included in the ban, and  
            bars, taverns, and gaming clubs were phased in by 1998. The  
            law covers all "enclosed" places of employment; therefore,  
            patio or outdoor dining facilities may allow smoking.  

            While California's law is restrictive, a number of exemptions  
            are allowed which have prevented our state from being  
            considered a 100% smoke-free state by the CDC, 25 other states  
            are currently considered 100% indoor workplace smoke-free.  
            Many local jurisdictions have closed the loop on these  
            exemptions through the enactment of local ordinances. In  
            addition, gaming facilities not under the jurisdiction of the  
            State (tribal casinos) are not required to comply, although  
            some have done so voluntarily for the health of their  
            employees and patrons.  

            Unfortunately, these efforts have not been enough to protect  
            people from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke as  
            evidenced by the high number of casualties.  DPH estimates  
            that the loopholes in California's smoke free workplace law  
            currently allow one in seven employees to work in an  
            employment setting where they could be exposed to secondhand  
            smoke. The patrons who visit, and the employees who work in  
            these unsafe environments, are receiving unequal protection  
            under the law as long as these exemptions are in place. 

           4)   Related Legislation. SBX2 5 (Leno)/AB X2 6 (Cooper) recast  
            and broaden the definition of "tobacco product" in current law  
            to include electronic cigarettes as specified; extend current  
            restrictions and prohibitions against the use of tobacco  
            products to electronic cigarettes; extend current licensing  
            requirements for manufacturers, importers, distributors,  
            wholesalers, and retailers of tobacco products to electronic  
            cigarettes; and, require electronic cigarette cartridges to be  
            child-resistant. SB X2 5 will be heard on August 19, 2015 in  
            this committee and AB X2 6 is pending in the Assembly.

            AB X2 7 (Stone) prohibit smoking in owner-operated businesses  
            and remove specified exemptions in existing law that allow  
            tobacco smoking in certain workplaces. AB X2 7 is pending in  
            the Assembly.








          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 6 of ?
          
          

            SBX2 7 (Hernandez)/AB X2 8 (Wood) increase the minimum legal  
            age to purchase or consume tobacco from 18 to 21. SB X2 7 will  
            be heard on August 19, 2015 in this committee and AB X2 8 is  
            pending in the Assembly.

            SBX2 8 (Liu)/ABX2 9 (Thurmond and Nazarian) extend current  
            tobacco use prevention funding eligibility and requirements to  
            charter schools; broaden the definition of products containing  
            tobacco and nicotine, as specified, and prohibit their use in  
            specified areas of schools and school districts, regardless of  
            funding; and require specified signs to be prominently  
            displayed at all entrances to school property. SB X2 8 will be  
            heard on August 19, 2015 in this committee and AB X2 9 is  
            pending in the Assembly.

            SBX2 9 (McGuire)/ABX2 10 (Bloom) allow counties to impose a  
            tax on the privilege of distributing cigarettes and tobacco  
            products. SB X2 9 will be heard on August 19, 2015 in this  
            committee and AB X2 10 is pending in the Assembly.

            SBX2 10 (Beall)/ABX2 11 (Nazarian) revise the Cigarette and  
            Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003 to change the retailer  
            license fee from a $100 one-time fee to a $265 annual fee, and  
            increase the distributor and wholesaler license fee from  
            $1,000 to $1,200. SB X2 10 will be heard on August 19, 2015 in  
            this committee and AB X2 11 is pending in the Assembly.

          5)Prior legislation. SB 575 (DeSaulnier, 2011), and AB 1467  
            (DeSaulnier, 2007), were   almost identical to this bill and  
            would have eliminated most of the exemptions in code which  
            permit smoking in certain work environments.  SB 575 died in  
            Assembly Governmental Organization Committee, and, AB 1467 was  
            vetoed by the Governor.
           
            AB 217 (Carter, 2011), would have restricted smoking in  
            long-term health care facilities by only allowing smoking in a  
            designated patient smoking area that is outdoors, as  
            specified.  AB 217 was vetoed by the Governor. 
            
            AB 2067 (Oropeza, Chapter 736, Statutes of 2006), prohibits  
            smoking in covered parking lots and adds to the definition of  
            "enclosed spaces" lobbies, lounges, waiting areas, elevators,  
            stairwells and restrooms that are a structural part of the  
            building, thereby prohibiting smoking in those areas.








          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 7 of ?
          
          

            AB 846 (Vargas, Chapter 342, Statutes of 2003), prohibits  
            smoking inside a public building and within 20 feet of a main  
            exit, entrance, or operable window of a public building. 

          6)Support.  Proponents argue that tobacco use is the single most  
            preventable cause of death and disease, nearly 40,000  
            Californians lost their lives to tobacco related illnesses  
            last year.  There is overwhelming scientific evidence that  
            secondhand tobacco smoke is a direct cause of heart disease,  
            the number one killer of both men and women in California.   
            According to the American Lung Association in California,  
            smoking costs the state of California $23 billion a year in  
            both health costs and lost productivity with $3.5 billion  
            directly linked to Medi-Cal. Proponents argue that every  
            Californian deserves to work in a healthy environment and  
            should not have to make a choice between a good job and good  
            health.  Given the human cost and the economic burden of  
            smoking, proponents believe it is time for California to catch  
            up to the rest of the nation and become a 100% smoke-free  
            state. 
          
          7)Author's Amendment. The author requests the committee approve  
            an amendment that would restore the following section from  
            current law which exempts these locations from the workplace  
            smoking prohibition: 
          
               (e) (4) Retail or wholesale tobacco shops and private  
               smokers' lounges. 
               For purposes of this paragraph:
                (A)     "Private smokers' lounge" means any enclosed area  
                  in or attached to a 
               retail or wholesale tobacco shop that is dedicated to the  
               use of tobacco products, including, but not limited to,  
               cigars and pipes.
                (B)     "Retail or wholesale tobacco shop" means any  
                  business establishment 
               the main purpose of which is the sale of tobacco products,  
               including, but not 
               limited to, cigars, pipe tobacco, and smoking accessories.
          
           SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION  :
          Support:  American Cancer Society - Cancer Action Network 
                    American Heart Association/American Stroke Association  









          SBX2 6 (Monning)                                   Page 8 of ?
          
          
                    American Lung Association in California 
                    Association of Northern California Oncologists 
                    California Black Health Network
                    California Dental Association 
                    California Medical Association 
                    California Optometric Association
                    California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
                    California Primary Care Association 
                    California Society of Addiction Medicine
                    First 5 Association of California
                    Medical Oncology Association of Southern California,  
                    Inc.
                    Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
                    Service Employees International Union 
          
          Oppose:   None received
          
                                      -- END --