BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS Senator Ben Allen, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: SCA 8 Hearing Date: 7/7/15 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Mendoza | |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------| |Version: |5/11/15 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: | |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Darren Chesin | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Charter counties: board of supervisors: redistricting DIGEST This bill, if approved by the voters, requires any charter county with a population greater than two million residents after the 2020 U.S. census to have a governing body comprised of at least seven members. ANALYSIS Existing law : 1)Requires, pursuant to the California Constitution, that if a county adopts its own voter-approved charter, it must have a directly elected board of supervisors with at least five members. The Constitution allows charter counties to elect their supervisors by districts, from districts, or at large. This bill : 1)Requires that in a charter county with a population of more than two million residents at a decennial U.S. census, beginning with the 2020 U.S. census, the county charter must provide for a governing body of seven or more members. 2)Caps expenditures for the governing body and its staff, in a charter county with a population of more than 2 million residents, at either the amount budgeted for the 2020-21 fiscal year or the amount that has the same proportion to SCA 8 (Mendoza) Page 2 of ? total county expenditures as the governing body and staff expenditures had to the total county budget in the 2020-21 fiscal year, whichever is less. 3)Repeals, on January 1, 2021, the authority for any county charter to provide for a governing body elected at-large or at-large by district. 4)Repeals, on January 1, 2021, constitutional language specifying the manner in which some charter counties can prescribe their governing bodies' compensation by ordinance. 5)Makes additional non-substantive changes to current law. BACKGROUND Affected Counties . There are 14 charter counties in California: Alameda, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Los Angeles, Orange, Placer, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Tehama. San Francisco, a city and county, elects its 11 supervisors by districts. The other charter counties all elect their five-member boards of supervisors by districts. Five counties have populations of more than two million residents: Los Angeles (10.1 million), San Diego (3.2 million), Orange (3.1 million), Riverside (2.3 million), and San Bernardino (2.1 million). Are Some Supervisorial Districts Too Large ? In large counties, some observers complain that the size of the supervisorial districts result in unrepresentative democracy. Each Los Angeles County supervisor represents nearly two million constituents, which is larger than the countywide population in 53 of California's 58 counties. The extreme ratio between constituents and supervisors can lead to political alienation and a lack of political responsiveness. Some observers also suggest that five-member boards of supervisors provide few opportunities to increase the diversity of the members to better represent demographic changes in California's most populous counties. SCA 8 (Mendoza) Page 3 of ? Although voters can amend their county's charter to expand the number of supervisors, there are no recent successes: 1)On November 6, 1962, Los Angeles County voters rejected Proposition D, which would have expanded the Board of Supervisors from five members to seven members. 2)At the November 2, 1976 General Election, Los Angeles County voters rejected Proposition B, which would have expanded the Board of Supervisors from five members to nine members. 3)Proposition C on the November 3, 1992 ballot, would have increased the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors from five to nine members, failed by a margin of about two-to-one. 4)On the March 26, 1996 primary ballot, voters in Orange County rejected Measure U, a charter proposal to expand the board of supervisors from five members to nine members. 5)On November 7, 2000, more than 64% of Los Angeles County voters rejected Measure A, which would have increased the number of county supervisors from five to nine. COMMENTS 1)According to the author : SCA 8 is a bipartisan measure that will require that any county that has two million or more residents based upon the 2020 Census, to add two seats to their board of supervisors. While counties have the ability to address the issue of adequate representation on county boards, only a few such ballot attempts have been made in the last 150 years - all unsuccessfully. Since the 1950s, four of them have taken place in Los Angeles and once in Orange county and rejected each time for inadequate cost controls. SCA 8 has strong and effective cost control by requiring funding of the expanded board at the 2020-21, pre-expansion levels. As a statewide measure, SCA 8 reduces the historic ability of individual incumbents or groups of incumbents to kill local measures to expand a board, as in 2000 when Los Angeles County Supervisors responded to SCA 7 (Polanco) that sought to expand the LA County Board. They instead placed County Measure A on the ballot to expand to nine members and insisted on a vacuous cost control mechanism. Once on the ballot, the majority of SCA 8 (Mendoza) Page 4 of ? the five board incumbents raised funds and campaigned against Measure A - using the lack of effective cost control and the near doubling of the members as a platform - to ensure its defeat. SCA 8 is designed to have the most minimal impact on a county's authority to manage itself as it restricts itself to expanding the Board by two members if the population of the county exceeds two million people. The affected County retains all of its existing powers. Expanding the number of supervisorial seats for the state's largest counties will provide the opportunity for these bodies to be more responsive and reflective of the needs of the people they represent and serve. This constitutional amendment is about increasing representation and accountability in our county governments by bringing them a little closer to home and to the people they represent. County boards of supervisor members carry out legislative and executive branch responsibilities for their constituents. They oversee a majority of vital services to our residents including healthcare, public safety, traffic, social services, public works, parks, and libraries among others. However, although elected, the number of members on county board of supervisors has not changed since their creation more than 150 years ago, despite dramatic changes in the state's population, demographics and their increased responsibilities for the services they oversee for their constituents. These types of services require constant attention to the concerns of their constituents in the delivery of these services. SCA 8 will bring about better delivery of services for residents and accountability to make sure the services are fairly and efficiently provided. As amended, SCA 8 would currently cover five counties, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and San Diego. Santa Clara may join the list if its population exceeds two million in 2020. 2)Proposed Author's Amendments . The author has informed the committee that he wishes to amend this bill to include general law counties with a population of more than two million. Such SCA 8 (Mendoza) Page 5 of ? an amendment would have the effect of including Riverside County within it provisions. The proposed amendments would also clarify that the seven board members be elected by district, require that the members reside in the district, and that they be subject to existing statutes that relate to apportioning population of governing body districts. 3)Is This the Best Approach ? Some observers note that increasing the size of a county governing board addresses only part of the problem when discussing the ability of county governments to properly function. As the author notes, members of county boards of supervisors carry out legislative and executive branch responsibilities for their constituents. Since San Francisco is both a city and county, it is the only county in California with an elected mayor or county executive. However, some or all of the counties in 25 other states also have elected county executives or mayors. An elected county executive relieves the governing board from the responsibility of overseeing the day-to-day operations of administrative agencies and allows them to function more like a traditional legislative body. Furthermore, an elected county executive is accountable to the voters in the entire county rather than just those within a supervisorial district. RELATED/PRIOR LEGISLATION SCA 7 (Polanco) of 1999-2000, which was held in Assembly Elections Committee, would have expanded the minimum number of supervisors for Los Angeles County from five to nine. PRIOR ACTION ------------------------------------------------------------------ | | | |--------------------------------------+---------------------------| |Senate Governance and Finance | 4-2 | |Committee: | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ POSITIONS Sponsor: Author Support: Los Amigos of Orange County Los Angeles County Chicano Employees Association SCA 8 (Mendoza) Page 6 of ? Oppose: California State Association of Counties Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Orange County Board of Supervisors San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors Urban Counties Caucus -- END -