Senate Joint ResolutionNo. 26


Introduced by Senator De León

(Coauthor: Senator Leno)

August 3, 2016


Senate Joint Resolution No. 26—Relative to blood donations.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SJR 26, as introduced, De León. Blood donations.

This measure would call upon the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to adopt policies to repeal the current discriminatory donor suitability policies of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding blood donations by men who have had sex with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop science-based policies such as criteria based on risky behavior in lieu of sexual orientation.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Since 1983, the United States Food and Drug
2Administration (FDA), an agency under the United States
3Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), had prohibited
4the donation of blood by any man who has had sex with another
5man (MSM) at any time since 1977; and

6WHEREAS, In December 2015, based on recommendations
7from the HHS Advisory Committee on Blood and Tissue Safety
8and Availability, the FDA promulgated revised regulations to allow
9an MSM to donate blood only if he has not been sexually active
10for the past 12 months. Despite these recent steps toward a policy
11change, a double standard would still exist under the policy as it
P2    1is proposed to be revised because it would still treat gay and
2bisexual men differently from heterosexual men; and

3WHEREAS, California law prohibits discrimination against
4individuals on the basis of actual or perceived sex, sexual
5orientation, gender identity, and gender-related appearance and
6behavior; and

7WHEREAS, Argentina, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Russia,
8South Africa, South Korea, and Spain have adopted blood donor
9policies that measure risk against a set of behaviors, sexual and
10otherwise, rather than the sex of a person’s sexual partner or
11partners; and

12WHEREAS, The FDA does not allow gay and bisexual men in
13committed relationships to donate blood because, while one partner
14may be monogamous, that individual cannot guarantee that the
15other partner is monogamous. The FDA does not apply this same
16logic to heterosexual relationships, which in effect discriminates
17against gay and bisexual men; and

18WHEREAS, A 12-month deferral policy for gay and bisexual
19men to donate blood is overly stringent given the scientific
20evidence, advanced testing methods, and the safety and quality
21control measures in place within the different FDA-qualified blood
22donating centers; and

23WHEREAS, The American Public Health Association has stated
24that no specific scientific rationale is provided to justify the
2512-month deferral policy. The technology can identify within 7 to
2610 days with 99.9 percent accuracy whether or not a blood sample
27is HIV-positive, and the chance of the blood test being inaccurate
28within the 10-day window is about 1 in 2,000,000; and

29WHEREAS, The General Social Survey conducted by NORC
30at the University of Chicago estimates that 8.5 percent of men in
31the United States have had at least one male sex partner since 18
32years of age, 4.1 percent of men report at least one male sex partner
33in the last 5 years, and 3.8 percent report a male sex partner in the
34last 12 months; and

35WHEREAS, An estimated 45.4 percent of men (54 million) in
36the United States are eligible to donate blood, but only 8.7 percent
37of eligible men actually do. There are 15.7 million donations of
38blood per year made by 9.2 million donors, yielding approximately
391.7 donations per donor; and

P3    1WHEREAS, The Williams Institute of the University of
2California at Los Angeles School of Law estimates that, based on
3the population of eligible and likely donors among the MSM
4community, lifting the federal lifetime deferral policy on blood
5donation by an MSM would result in 4.2 million newly eligible
6male donors, of which 360,600 would likely donate, generating
7615,300 additional pints of blood. Applying national estimates to
8the California population, the Institute further estimates that lifting
9the ban on MSM blood donations would add an additional 510,000
10eligible men to the current blood donor pool, of which 43,917
11would likely donate, resulting in an additional 74,945 donated
12pints in California; and

13WHEREAS, One hundred fifteen members of the Congress of
14the United States sent a letter to the FDA Commissioner, Dr.
15Robert M. Califf, MD, urging him to finally put an end to this
16outdated blood donation policy and update it to reflect science,
17not fear; now, therefore, be it

18Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
19California, jointly,
That the California State Legislature calls upon
20the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of
21the United States Department of Health and Human Services to
22adopt policies to repeal the current discriminatory donor suitability
23policies of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
24regarding blood donations by men who have had sex with another
25man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop science-based policies
26such as criteria based on risky behavior in lieu of sexual
27orientation; and be it further

28Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
29this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
30States, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health
31and Human Services, to the Speaker of the House of
32Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each
33Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
34United States.



O

    99