BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 111|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  SB 111
          Author:   Fuller (R), et al.
          Amended:  6/2/15  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE:  6-0, 3/11/15
           AYES:  Huff, Block, Leyva, Mendoza, Pan, Vidak
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Liu, Hancock

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 5/28/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           SUBJECT:   School facilities:  military installations


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill declares the Legislature's intent to meet the  
          matching share requirements of a specified federal school  
          construction grant program in 2015-16 and directs the Department  
          of Finance (DOF) to explore options for this purpose, including  
          low interest loans, as specified.


          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:

          1)Establishes the California Infrastructure and Economic  
            Development Bank (IBank) within the Governor's Office of  
            Business and Economic Development to finance public  








                                                                     SB 111  
                                                                    Page  2


            infrastructure and private development that promote a healthy  
            climate for jobs, contribute to a strong economy and improve  
            the quality of life in California communities. The IBank is  
            governed by a five-member Board of Directors which includes:

             a)   The Director of DOF or his or her designee.

             b)   The Treasurer or his or her designee.

             c)   The Director of the Governor's Office of Business and  
               Economic Development or his or her designee, who shall  
               serve as chair of the board.

             d)   An appointee of the Governor.

             e)   The Secretary of Transportation or his or her designee.

          2)Provides that the IBank has broad authority to issue  
            tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds, provide financing to  
            public agencies, provide credit enhancements, acquire or lease  
            facilities, and leverage State and Federal funds. (Government  
            Code Sections § 63000 et. seq.)

          3)Establishes the School Facility Program under which the state  
            provides general obligation bond funding for various school  
            construction projects. AB 127 (Nunez and Perata), the  
            Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act  
            of 2006, authorized Proposition 1D a statewide general  
            obligation bond proposal for $10.4 billion.  Proposition 1D,  
            approved, by the voters in November 2006, provided $7.3  
            billion for K-12 education facilities and allocated specified  
            amounts from the sale of these bonds for modernization, new  
            construction, charter schools, Career Technical Education  
            Facilities, joint use projects, new construction on severely  
            overcrowded school sites, and high performance incentive  
            grants to promote energy efficient design and materials.  In  
            addition, portions of the amounts allocated for new  
            construction and modernization were authorized for purposes of  
            funding smaller learning communities and small high schools  
            and for seismic retrofit projects. (Education Code §  
            17078.70-17078.72)

          This bill:








                                                                     SB 111  
                                                                    Page  3


          1)Declares the Legislature's intent to meet the matching share  
            requirements of the United States Department of Defense (DOD),  
            Office of Economic Adjustment school construction grant  
            program in 2015-16 in order to meet the construction needs of  
            public school facilities located on military installations.

          2)Directs the DOF to explore options for this purpose, including  
            low interest loans through the IBank.
          


          Comments

       1)Need for the bill. According to the author, California has 11  
            schools in six districts that are on a priority list for funds  
            from the federal government to address the "serious condition  
            or capacity deficiencies" of public schools on military  
            installations. These schools are eligible to receive funds for  
            this purpose through the Public Schools on Military  
            Installations (PSMI ) Program. The program requires a 20  
            percent non-federal match in order to receive federal funding.

            According to the author, about $61 million is necessary to  
            cover the 20 percent match for the 11 California schools on  
            the list.  The 20 percent match would leverage approximately  
            $240 million in federal funds for the renovation, repair, or  
            reconstruction of these schools.

       2)PSMI Program.  According to the Office of Economic Adjustment  
            (OEA), in 2010 the DOD evaluated and reviewed the physical  
            condition of the 160 public schools on military installations  
            in the United States.  Based on the findings of this  
            assessment, the DOD developed a "Priority List" of public  
            schools on military installations with the most serious  
            condition and/or capacity deficiencies.  The OEA was tasked  
            with administering the PSMI program to provide funds to these  
            schools to address these deficiencies.  

            Between 2011 and 2015, Congress has provided $945 million to  
            the OEA for the purposes of the PSMI.  The last increase in  
            funding for the PSMI ($175 million) was provided in 2015 by  
            House Resolution 83 (H.R. 83 Section 8017).  In addition to  
            the funding increase, H.R. 83 established the 20 percent match  
            as a congressionally mandated requirement and stipulated that  







                                                                     SB 111  
                                                                    Page  4


            the non-federal match was the responsibility of the local  
            education authority (LEA) and the State.  The DOD has  
            interpreted the new language to mean that the matching share  
            must be provided by the LEA and or the State in which the  
            school is located and that the OEA may skip eligible school  
            projects on the Priority List if the match is not provided.   
            According to the OEA, once a project on the list has been  
            skipped it will no longer be considered for funding.

            According to the OEA, there is approximately $464 million  
            remaining in the PSMI. The OEA estimates that as many as 33  
            schools on the list could be assisted.

          FISCAL EFFECT:    Appropriation:    No         Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:No


          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there may be  
          unknown cost pressure to implement the option identified by the  
          DOF.  Staff estimates that costs for the DOF to explore options  
          are minor and absorbable.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified  3/11/15) (reflects prior version of  
          bill--unable to reverify)


          Antelope Valley Board of Trade
          Brigadier General, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton
          Central Union School District
          Muroc Joint Unified School District
          Sierra Sands Unified School District
          Travis Unified School District
          Numerous individual letters


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified  3/11/15) (reflects prior version of  
          bill--unable to reverify)


          None received


          Prepared by:Kathleen Chavira / ED. / (916) 651-4105







                                                                     SB 111  
                                                                    Page  5


          6/2/15 21:53:10


                                   ****  END  ****