Senate BillNo. 144


Introduced by Senator Pan

January 27, 2015


An act to amend Section 12670.14 of the Water Code, relating to water resources.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 144, as introduced, Pan. Water development projects: Sacramento-San Joaquin watersheds.

Existing law provides for state cooperation with the federal government in the construction of specified flood control projects. Existing law adopts and authorizes federally adopted and approved projects, including a 200-year level of flood protection in the Natomas Basin, in areas within the City of Sacramento and the Counties of Sacramento and Sutter. The projects are authorized at an estimated cost to the state of the sum that may be appropriated by the Legislature for state participation upon the recommendation and advice of the Department of Water Resources or the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, formerly known as the Reclamation Board.

This bill would describe the Natomas Basin flood protection project as further modified by a specified report adopted by Congress. The bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P1    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of
2the following:

P2    1(a) In April 2007, the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
2(SAFCA) secured the support of property owners in the Sacramento
3region for the imposition of a special benefit assessment to fund
4the local share of the cost of the levee improvement projects along
5the American and Sacramento Rivers, including the Natomas
6Basin, and the project to modify Folsom Dam to provide the
7Sacramento region with at least a 200-year level of flood protection
8based on current estimates of the runoff likely to be produced by
9such a flood event. Later that year, the Legislature passed Senate
10Bill 276, enacted as Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 2007, which
11modified existing state authorizations for these projects in order
12to continue the historic federal-state-local cost-sharing partnership
13governing the projects and ensure that project construction could
14move forward as quickly as possible.

15(b) Since 2007, more than one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000)
16in federal, state, and local funds has been expended on these
17projects in a manner that has substantially increased the ability of
18the existing flood control system to protect heavily urbanized areas
19within the City of Sacramento and the Counties of Sacramento
20and Sutter against very rare floods.

21(c) Much of this work has occurred in the Natomas Basin where
22SAFCA, with the state’s financial assistance, has raised and
23strengthened about 18 miles of the most vulnerable segments of
24the perimeter levee system protecting the Natomas Basin. Because
25of changes in federal and state engineering standards since 2007,
26these improvements and the improvements needed for the
27remainder of the perimeter levee system have greatly exceeded
28the scope of the Natomas Project set forth in the Final Engineer’s
29Report dated April 19, 2007, which governed SAFCA’s special
30benefit assessment proceedings and informed the Legislature’s
31accompanying project authorization.

32(d) The full scope of the work necessary to provide the Natomas
33Basin with at least a 200-year level of flood protection is described
34in an engineering report prepared in 2010 by the United States
35Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for the American River
36Watershed, Common Features Project, Natomas Basin. This report,
37which outlines the steps the Corps will take to complete the work
38in Natomas initiated by the state and SAFCA, was transmitted to
39Congress by the Chief of Engineers of the Corps in December
P3    12010 and adopted by Congress as part of the Water Resources
2Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-121).

3(e) Consistent with its historic practice of providing state
4approval for federally authorized projects affecting the State Plan
5of Flood Control, the Legislature has determined that modification
6of the 2007 state authorization for the Natomas Project is warranted
7in order to enlarge the scope of the authorized project to match the
8federal authorization without altering the federal-state-local cost
9sharing made applicable to the project under the 2007 authorization.

10

SEC. 2.  

Section 12670.14 of the Water Code is amended to
11read:

12

12670.14.  

The following projects in areas within the City of
13Sacramento and the Counties of Sacramento and Sutter are adopted
14and authorized at an estimated cost to the state of the sum that may
15be appropriated by the Legislature for state participation upon the
16recommendation and advice of the department or thebegin delete Reclamationend delete
17begin insert Central Valley Flood Protectionend insert Board:

18(a) The project for flood control in the Natomas and North
19Sacramento areas adopted and authorized by Congress in Section
209159 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 1993
21(Public Law 102-396) substantially in accordance with the
22recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report entitled
23“American River Watershed Investigation” dated July 1, 1992.

24(b) The project for flood control along the American and
25Sacramento Rivers adopted and authorized by Congress in Section
26101(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996begin insert (Public
27Law 104-303)end insert
substantially in accordance with the
28recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report entitled
29“American River Watershed Project, California” dated June 27,
301996, as modified by Congress in Section 366 of the Water
31Resources Development Act ofbegin delete 1999, andend deletebegin insert 1999 (Public Law
32106-53),end insert
as further modified to include the project features
33necessary to provide a 200-year level of flood protection along the
34American and Sacramento Rivers and within the Natomas Basin
35as described in thebegin delete final engineer’s reportend deletebegin insert Final Engineer’s Reportend insert
36 dated April 19, 2007, adopted by the Sacramento Area Flood
37Controlbegin delete Agency.end deletebegin insert Agency, and as further modified by the 2010 final
38feasibility study for the American River Watershed, Common
39Features Project, Natomas Basin, adopted by Congress in Section
P4    17002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014
2(Public Law 113-121).end insert

3(c) The project to modify Folsom Dam adopted and authorized
4by Congress in Section 101(a)(6) of the Water Resources
5Development Act ofbegin delete 1999,end deletebegin insert 1999 (Public Law 106-53),end insert as described
6in the United States Army Corps of Engineers Supplemental
7Information Report for the American River Watershed Project,
8California, dated March 1996, as modified by the report entitled
9“Folsom Dam Modification Report, New Outlets Plan,” dated
10March 1998, prepared by the Sacramento Area Flood Control
11Agency, and as further modified by the Post-Authorization Change
12Report, American River Watershed Project (Folsom Dam
13Modification and Folsom Dam Raise Projects), dated March 2007,
14adopted by Congress in Sectionbegin delete 3023end deletebegin insert 3029end insert of the Water Resources
15Development Act ofbegin delete 2007.end deletebegin insert 2007 (Public Law 110-114).end insert

16(d) (1) The project for flood control, environmental restoration,
17and recreation along south Sacramento County streams adopted
18and authorized by Congress in Sectionbegin delete 101(a)(7)end deletebegin insert 101(a)(8)end insert of the
19Water Resources Development Act of 1999begin insert (Public Law 106-53)end insert
20 as described in the report of the Chief of Engineers entitled “South
21Sacramento County Streams, California” dated October 6, 1998.

22(2) Notwithstanding Section 12657, at the discretion of the
23begin delete Reclamationend deletebegin insert Central Valley Flood Protectionend insert Board, the
24Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency may provide, for the
25project described in paragraph (1), the assurances of local
26cooperation satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, in accordance
27with Section 12657, in lieu of assurances by thebegin delete Reclamationend delete
28begin insert Central Valley Flood Protectionend insert Board.



O

    99