BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 145 Page 1 Date of Hearing: September 11, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 145 (Pan) - As Amended September 10, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Health |Vote:|12 - 4 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to provide stop-loss coverage to a private multi-employer trust providing health care benefits to farmworkers. Specifically, this bill: SB 145 Page 2 1)Requires DHCS to annually reimburse the Robert F. Kennedy Farmworkers Medical Plan (RFK Medical Plan) for claim payments that exceed $70,000. 2)Requires reimbursement made by the plan on behalf of an eligible employee or dependent for a single episode of care on or after September 1, 2016. 3)Limits total reimbursement to three million dollars ($3,000,000) per year. 4)Requires the RFK Medical Plan to submit to the department completed data, verified by an independent certified public accountant, for claims paid by the plan for services during the preceding year from September 1 to August 31, inclusive. FISCAL EFFECT: GF costs of up to $3 million per year to DHCS to reimburse RFK Medical Plan for episodes of high-cost care incurred by RFK Medical Plan enrollees. SB 145 Page 3 COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill will provide state funding critical to allow a particular health trust fund to continue to provide health benefits to their enrollees. Absent this funding, the author contends, the plan would cease providing benefits and individuals would either enroll in Medi-Cal or lose insurance coverage. Because Medi-Cal would incur additional costs if low-income eligible individuals enrolled in coverage, the author argues this bill actually saves the state money. 2)Background. The RFK Medical Plan is a self-funded, self-insured health plan that is subject to a collective bargaining agreement between the United Farm Workers (UFW) and multiple agricultural employers. According to the UFW, the RFK Medical Plan provided health insurance to more than 13,000 people living in California farmworker families. UFW points out that their plan had imposed a $70,000 limit on annual benefits as a cost control measure, but the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) prohibits such benefit limits. This has resulted in significant cost pressure that UFW states is unrealistic to expect employers and employees to bear. UFW states there are approximately 16,000 California farmworkers covered by the plan and about 2,000 other individuals. Staff calculates the increased contribution to cover $3 million in additional costs incurred on behalf of 18,000 enrollees would be about $167 per enrollee, per year, including dependents. SB 145 Page 4 3)Prior Budget Actions. The Legislature took two separate budget actions in recent years to provide special fund dollars to the RFK Medical Plan to purchase stop-loss coverage that covers the costs of episodes of care over $70,000. This supplemental funding has allowed the plan to maintain the annual benefit limits and comply with the ACA requirement, without passing these costs on to covered employees and employers. Specifically, the 2014 Budget Act allocated $3.2 million in one-time Proposition 99 funds, and the 2015 Budget Act allocated $2.5 million in Proposition 99 funds. The allocated funds were previously used to fund the Major Risk Medical Insurance Program, which provided coverage to enrollees who were denied coverage in the private market, prior to the federal ACA. The budget actions were intended to provide one-time funding in order to prevent insolvency and allow RFK Medical Plan to modify its business model to adapt to the federal ACA. 4)Comments. a) Recent amendments impose a five-year sunset in order to prevent the state from becoming the default payer of high-cost claims for this plan on a permanent basis. The Health Committee policy analysis indicates a sunset date also offers the RFK Medical Plan a timeline under which it can continue to strive toward self-sustainment, and report back its progress to the Legislature. However, the bill does not specify reporting or accountability measures, nor clearly state intent language related to self-sufficiency. SB 145 Page 5 b) This bill has intent language stating the Legislature has found it is efficient and cost-effective to provide health care through the RFK Medical Plan, and indicating the plan has saved the state significant sums of money. However, there does not appear to be a legislative analysis conclusively demonstrating savings. c) According to UFW, some enrollees in the RFK Medical Plan are not California farmworkers. Therefore, it appears that this bill would authorize reimbursement for enrollees who do not work in California. Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081