SB 153, as introduced, Huff. Mortgage foreclosure consultants.
Existing law defines mortgage foreclosure consultants and regulates their activities. Existing law states the intent of the Legislature to protect homeowners who are in the process of foreclosure from abuses and fraudulent practices by foreclosure consultants.
This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 2945 of the Civil Code is amended to
2read:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that homeowners
4whose residences are in foreclosure are subject to fraud, deception,
5harassment, and unfair dealing by foreclosure consultants from
6the time a Notice of Default is recorded pursuant to Section 2924
7until the time surplus funds from any foreclosure sale are
8distributed to the homeowner or his or her successor. Foreclosure
9consultants represent that they can assist homeowners who have
10defaulted on obligations secured by their residences. These
11foreclosure consultants, however, often charge high fees, the
P2 1payment of which is often secured by a deed of trust on the
2residence to be saved, and perform no service or essentially a
3worthless service. Homeowners, relying on the foreclosure
4consultants’ promises of help, take no other action, are
diverted
5from lawful businesses which could render beneficial services,
6and often lose their homes, sometimes to the foreclosure
7consultants who purchase homes at a fraction of their value before
8the sale. Vulnerable homeowners are increasingly relying on the
9services of foreclosure consultants who advise the homeowner
10that the foreclosure consultant can obtain the remaining funds from
11the foreclosure sale if the homeowner executes an assignment of
12the surplus, a deed, or a power of attorney in favor of the
13foreclosure consultant. This results in the homeowner paying an
14exorbitant fee for a service when the homeowner could have
15obtained the remaining funds from the trustee’s sale from the
16trustee directly for minimal cost if the homeowner had consulted
17legal counsel or had sufficient time to receive notices from the
18trustee pursuant to Section 2924j regarding how and where to make
19a claim for excess proceeds.
20(b) The Legislature further finds
and declares that foreclosure
21consultants have a significant impact on the economy of this state
22and on the welfare of its citizens.
23(c) The intent and purposes of this article are the following:
24(1) To require that foreclosure consultant service agreements
25be expressed inbegin delete writing; toend deletebegin insert writing.end insert
26begin insert(2)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTo end insertsafeguard the public against deceit and financialbegin delete hardship; begin insert
hardship.end insert
27toend delete
28begin insert(3)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTo end insertpermit rescission of foreclosure consultationbegin delete contracts; begin insert contracts.end insert
29toend delete
30begin insert(4)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTo end insertprohibit representations that tend tobegin delete mislead; and toend delete
31begin insert
mislead.end insert
32begin insert(5)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTo end insertencourage fair dealing in the rendition of foreclosure
33services.
34(2)
end delete
35begin insert(d)end insert The provisions of this article shall be liberally construed to
36effectuate this intent and to achieve these purposes.
O
99