BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 172 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 172 (Liu) - As Amended July 9, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Education |Vote:|5 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill suspends the requirement to pass the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) as a condition of receiving a high school diploma for the 2014-15 through the 2017-18 school years, inclusive. This bill also requires the Superintendent of Public SB 172 Page 2 Instruction (SPI) to convene an advisory panel to provide recommendations on the continuation of the CAHSEE and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school graduation requirements. These recommendations will be added to recommendations the SPI is required to make to the State Board of Education (SBE) regarding the expansion of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) by March 1, 2016. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)General Fund costs of approximately $200,000 for CDE to convene an advisory panel to provide recommendations on the continuation of the CAHSEE and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school graduation requirements. These recommendations could create significant cost pressures in the millions of dollars depending on the scope of the recommendations. 2)Proposition 98/GF savings in 2014-15 through 2017-18, potentially in the range of $10 million to $12 million, due to the suspension of the test. The 2015 Budget Act required the California Department of Education (CDE) to develop a plan to utilize any savings for other assessment needs. COMMENTS: 1)Background. The CAHSEE assesses pupils in the areas of English language arts and mathematics. It was established by SB 2X (O'Connell, Chapter 1, Statutes of 1999) as part of a package of school reform bills that established new curriculum content standards, a new statewide assessment program, and related professional development and instructional programs. SB 172 Page 3 The requirement to pass the exam as a condition of receiving a high school diploma became a requirement starting with the class of 2006. According to the most recent CAHSEE independent evaluation, the pass rate has increased from year to year, and in 2014 it was 97.2% among all pupils (this includes pupils who had to take the test more than once before they passed it). 2)Purpose. The CAHSEE is aligned to the content standards for English language arts and mathematics that were adopted pursuant to the 1999 education reform package of bills. In 2010 the SBE voted to adopt the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The adoption of the CCSS led to the development of new statewide assessments that are aligned to the new standards. However, the CAHSEE is still aligned to the old standards. The author proposes to suspend the test due to this misalignment between the test and the new standards. During the suspension of the CAHSEE, this bill also requires an advisory committee of academics and community stakeholders to meet and make recommendations regarding future administrations of a high school exit exam and alternative methods to meet high school graduation requirements. 3)Budget language. The 2015 Budget Act requires the CDE to develop a plan for the use of any savings from the funds appropriated for the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) to be submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the Department of Finance for approval. First priority for the use of any savings is required to be for the development of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) and the development of a primary language assessment and the California Alternate Assessments as specified in law for the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System. SB 172 Page 4 Analysis Prepared by:Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916) 319-2081