BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          172 (Liu)


          As Amended  September 1, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  25-14


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |5-0  |O'Donnell, Chávez,    |                    |
          |                |     |McCarty, Santiago,    |                    |
          |                |     |Thurmond              |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |12-5 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta,  |Bigelow, Chang,     |
          |                |     |Calderon, Nazarian,   |Gallagher, Jones,   |
          |                |     |Eggman, Eduardo       |Wagner              |
          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Rendon, Weber, |                    |
          |                |     |Wood                  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Suspends the requirement to pass the California High  








                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  2





          School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) as a condition of receiving a high  
          school diploma through the 2017-18 school years, inclusive.   
          Also requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to  
          convene an advisory panel, as specified, to provide  
          recommendations on the continuation of the CAHSEE and on  
          alternative pathways to satisfy the high school graduation  
          requirements.  These recommendations will be added to  
          recommendations the SPI is required to make to the State Board  
          of Education (SBE) regarding the expansion of the California  
          Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) by March  
          1, 2016.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)General Fund costs of approximately $200,000 for the  
            California Department of education (CDE) to convene an  
            advisory panel to provide recommendations on the continuation  
            of the CAHSEE and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high  
            school graduation requirements. These recommendations could  
            create significant cost pressures in the millions of dollars  
            depending on the scope of the recommendations. 


          2)Proposition 98/GF savings in 2015-16 through 2017-18,  
            potentially in the range of $10 million to $12 million, due to  
            the suspension of the test. The 2015 Budget Act required the  
            CDE to develop a plan to utilize any savings for other  
            assessment needs. 


          COMMENTS:


          Background.  The CAHSEE assesses pupils in the areas of English  
          language arts and mathematics.  It was established by SB 2 X1  
          (O'Connell), Chapter 1, Statutes of 1999-2000 First  








                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  3





          Extraordinary Session) as part of a package of school reform  
          bills that established new curriculum content standards, a new  
          statewide assessment program, and related professional  
          development and instructional programs.  


          The requirement to pass the exam as a condition of receiving a  
          high school diploma became a requirement starting with the class  
          of 2006.  According to the most recent CAHSEE independent  
          evaluation, the pass rate has increased from year to year, and  
          in 2014 it was 97.2% among all pupils (this includes pupils who  
          had to take the test more than once before they passed it).  


          Purpose.  The CAHSEE is aligned to the content standards for  
          English language arts and mathematics that were adopted pursuant  
          to the 1999 education reform package of bills.  In 2010 the SBE  
          voted to adopt the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).  The  
          adoption of the CCSS led to the development of new statewide  
          assessments that are aligned to the new standards.  However, the  
          CAHSEE is still aligned to the old standards.  The author  
          proposes to suspend the test due to this misalignment between  
          the test and the new standards.


          During the suspension of the CAHSEE, this bill also requires an  
          advisory committee of academics and community stakeholders to  
          meet and make recommendations regarding future administrations  
          of a high school exit exam and alternative methods to meet high  
          school graduation requirements. 


          Amendments adopted by the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          require school districts, county offices of education, and  
          charter schools to grant diplomas to all students who have met  
          all graduation requirements other than passing the exit exam and  
          sunsets this requirement on July 31, 2018. 










                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  4





          Budget language.  The 2015 Budget Act requires the CDE to  
          develop a plan for the use of any savings from the funds  
          appropriated for the California High School Exit Examination  
          (CAHSEE) to be submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget  
          Committee and the Department of Finance for approval.  First  
          priority for the use of any savings is required to be for the  
          development of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for  
          California (ELPAC) and the development of a primary language  
          assessment and the California Alternate Assessments as specified  
          in law for the California Assessment of Student Performance and  
          Progress (CAASPP) System. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN: 0001792