BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          172 (Liu)


          As Amended  September 4, 2015


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  25-14


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                   |Noes                 |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Education       |5-0  |O'Donnell, Chávez,     |                     |
          |                |     |McCarty, Santiago,     |                     |
          |                |     |Thurmond               |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |12-5 |Gomez, Bloom, Bonta,   |Bigelow, Chang,      |
          |                |     |Calderon, Nazarian,    |Gallagher, Jones,    |
          |                |     |Eggman,                |Wagner               |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,        |                     |
          |                |     |Holden, Quirk, Rendon, |                     |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood            |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 









                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  2






          SUMMARY:  Suspends the requirement to pass the California High  
          School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) as a condition of receiving a high  
          school diploma from the 2003-04 school year through the 2017-18  
          school year, inclusive.  Also requires the Superintendent of  
          Public Instruction (SPI) to convene an advisory panel, as  
          specified, to provide recommendations on the continuation of the  
          CAHSEE and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school  
          graduation requirements. These recommendations will be added to  
          recommendations the SPI is required to make to the State Board  
          of Education (SBE) regarding the expansion of the California  
          Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) by March  
          1, 2016.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1) General Fund costs of approximately $200,000 for the  
          California Department of education (CDE) to convene an advisory  
          panel to provide recommendations on the continuation of the  
          CAHSEE and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school  
          graduation requirements. These recommendations could create  
          significant cost pressures in the millions of dollars depending  
          on the scope of the recommendations. 


          2) Proposition 98 (1988)/General Fund savings in 2015-16 through  
          2017-18, potentially in the range of $10 million to $12 million,  
          due to the suspension of the test. The 2015 Budget Act required  
          the CDE to develop a plan to utilize any savings for other  
          assessment needs. 


          COMMENTS:


          Background.  The CAHSEE assesses pupils in the areas of English  








                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  3





          language arts and mathematics.  It was established by SB 2 X1  
          (O'Connell), Chapter 1, Statutes of 1999, as part of a package  
          of school reform bills that established new curriculum content  
          standards, a new statewide assessment program, and related  
          professional development and instructional programs.  


          The requirement to pass the exam as a condition of receiving a  
          high school diploma became a requirement starting with the class  
          of 2006.  According to the most recent CAHSEE independent  
          evaluation, the pass rate has increased from year to year, and  
          in 2014 it was 97.2% among all pupils (this includes pupils who  
          had to take the test more than once before they passed it).  


          Purpose.  The CAHSEE is aligned to the content standards for  
          English language arts and mathematics that were adopted pursuant  
          to the 1999 education reform package of bills. In 2010 the SBE  
          voted to adopt the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).  The  
          adoption of the CCSS led to the development of new statewide  
          assessments that are aligned to the new standards.  However, the  
          CAHSEE is still aligned to the old standards.  The author  
          proposes to suspend the test due to this misalignment between  
          the test and the new standards.


          During the suspension of the CAHSEE, this bill also requires an  
          advisory committee of academics and community stakeholders to  
          meet and make recommendations regarding future administrations  
          of a high school exit exam and alternative methods to meet high  
          school graduation requirements. 


          Amendments adopted by the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          require school districts, county offices of education, and  
          charter schools to grant diplomas to all students who have met  
          all graduation requirements other than passing the exit exam and  
          sunsets this requirement on July 31, 2018. 









                                                                     SB 172


                                                                    Page  4






          Budget language.  The 2015 Budget Act requires the CDE to  
          develop a plan for the use of any savings from the funds  
          appropriated for the CAHSEE to be submitted to the Joint  
          Legislative Budget Committee and the Department of Finance for  
          approval. First priority for the use of any savings is required  
          to be for the development of the English Language Proficiency  
          Assessments for California and the development of a primary  
          language assessment and the California Alternate Assessments as  
          specified in law for the CAASPP System. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN: 0002075