BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SCR 158|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  SCR 158
          Author:   Pan (D) and De León (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/16/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE:  9-2, 8/9/16
           AYES:  Hall, Block, Galgiani, Glazer, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso,  
            Lara, McGuire
           NOES:  Bates, Vidak
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Berryhill, Gaines

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-2, 8/11/16
           AYES:  Lara, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza
           NOES:  Bates, Nielsen

           SUBJECT:   Promise Zones


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:    This resolution encourages the State Department of  
          Education (CDE), the Department of Housing and Community  
          Development (CDHCD), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the  
          Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to give priority  
          consideration and preferred access to state programs and  
          resources to federally designated Promise Zones in California  
          that support job creation and economic security, expand  
          educational opportunities, increase access to affordable quality  
          housing, and improve public safety.

          Senate Floor Amendments of 8/16/16 (1) add Senator Hall and  
          Assembly Member Atkins as coauthors and (2) make a minor  








                                                                    SCR 158  
                                                                    Page  2


          technical change. 

          ANALYSIS:
          
          This resolution:

          1)Encourages CDE, CDHCD, DOJ, and CDFA to give priority  
            consideration and preferred access to state programs and  
            resources to federally designated Promise Zones in California  
            that support job creation and economic security, expand  
            educational opportunities, increase access to affordable  
            quality housing, and improve public safety.

          2)Encourages CDE, CDHCD, DOJ, and CDFA to consider giving  
            Promise Zones competitive preferences for state funding and  
            programs.

          3)Encourages California to explore implementation of the same  
            models that have been developed by the federal programs that  
            give preferences to Promise Zones.

          4)Declares that a child's Zip Code should never determine his or  
            her destiny and that the community a child grows up in greatly  
            impacts his or her odds of graduating from high school, health  
            outcomes, and economic opportunities.

          Background

          Purpose of the resolution.  According to the author, "the  
          resolution raises awareness on federally designated Promise  
          Zones and encourages the CDE, CDHCD, DOJ, and CDFA to give  
          federally designated Promise Zones priority consideration and  
          preferred access to State programs and resources." 

          Promise Zones.  In his 2014 State of the Union Address,  
          President Obama laid out an initiative to designate a number of  
          urban, rural, and tribal communities as Promise Zones.  Promise  
          Zones are high poverty communities where the federal government  
          partners with local leaders to increase economic activity,  
          improve educational opportunities, leverage private investment,  
          reduce violent crime, enhance public health and address other  
          priorities identified by the community.  

          The Promise Zone designation lasts for a term of 10 years.   







                                                                    SCR 158  
                                                                    Page  3


          During this term, the specific benefits available to Promise  
          Zones will vary from year to year, and sometimes more often, due  
          to changes in the agency policies and changes in appropriations  
          and authorizations for relevant programs. 

          There are 22 urban, rural and tribal Promise Zones, including  
          four in California.  These include Los Angeles, South Los  
          Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento.  Promise Zones were selected  
          through three rounds of national competition, in which  
          applicants demonstrated a consensus vision for their community  
          and its residents, the capacity to carry out that vision, and a  
          shared commitment to specific, measurable results.   

          Related/Prior Legislation
          
          AB 2 (Alejo, Chapter 319, Statutes of 2015) authorized local  
          governments to create Community Revitalization and Investment  
          Authorities to use tax increment revenue to improve the  
          infrastructure, assist businesses, and support affordable  
          housing in disadvantaged communities. 

          AB 93 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 69, Statutes of 2013)  
          phased-out and ended certain tax provisions related to  
          Enterprise Zones and similar tax incentive areas, and ended the  
          New Jobs Credit tax incentive program. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal Com.:  
          YesLocal:        No               


          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, unknown  
          potential cost pressure to CDE, CDHCD, DOJ, and CDFA to increase  
          funding on state programs and resources to give priority  
          consideration and preferred access to Promise Zones.   
          Additionally, unknown potential cost pressure to CDE, CDHCD,  
          DOJ, and CDFA to modify procedures to give priority  
          consideration and competitive preference for programming and  
          state funding to Promise Zones.




          Finally, unknown potential cost pressure to implement programs  







                                                                    SCR 158  
                                                                    Page  4


          modeled after federal programs that give preference to Promise  
          Zones. 




          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/16/16)


          None received


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/16/16)


          None received


          Prepared by:Felipe Lopez / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
          8/17/16 15:50:35


                                   ****  END  ****