BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 208 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 208 (Lara) - As Amended June 1, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Water, Parks and Wildlife |Vote:|15 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill allows the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to advance Integrated Regional Water Management Program (IRWMP) grants payments of up to 50% of the grant award. Specifically, this bill applies to: SB 208 Page 2 1)Projects undertaken by nonprofit organizations or disadvantaged communities; and 2)Projects that benefit disadvantaged communities. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Unknown potential losses, potentially in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (bond/GF) for misspent advanced funds that are unrecoverable. 2)Absorbable costs for DWR to update guidelines and administer the program. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, IRWMP funding represents a pay-as-you-go system where groups with approved plans provide funding for water projects up front and are reimbursed later. This mechanism is intended to safeguard state funds, but instead disadvantages smaller communities and nonprofit organizations who are impacted when pre-financing a water project requires a lager budget than they are able to fund upfront. This bill will improve equity by advancing grant funds to nonprofit organizations and disadvantaged communities under limited circumstances. 2)Background. Numerous water bonds, including most recently Proposition 1, provide funding for projects and programs through IRWMP grants. Typically, the Legislature appropriates bond funds to DWR for a competitive grant solicitation. DWR SB 208 Page 3 then issues guidelines for a round of IRWMP funding, and regional water management groups (RWMGs) submit their list of local projects. DWR ranks the projects and makes the awards within each IRWMP funding region. In many cases, RWMGs contract with local entities to carry out projects. In the typical reimbursement process, the local entity submits invoices to its RWMG, who then submits invoices to DWR. Upon review of the invoices, DWR reimburses the RWMG who then reimburses the local entity. Depending on the specific details of the funding agreement and the administrative processes of the RWMG, a number of months may pass between the time the local entity incurs the expense and the time they receive reimbursement from the management group. This creates a hardship for nonprofit organizations or disadvantaged communities unable to bear the up-front cost of the project. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081