Amended in Senate March 24, 2015

Senate BillNo. 210


Introduced by Senator Galgiani

February 11, 2015


An act tobegin delete amend Sections 42651, 42652, 42653, and 42654 of the Food and Agricultural Code, relating to fruit, nut, and vegetable standards.end deletebegin insert add Section 56326.5 to the Education Code, relating to special education.end insert

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 210, as amended, Galgiani. begin deleteFruit, nut, and vegetable standards: enforcement. end deletebegin insertSpecial education: deaf and hard-of-hearing children: language benchmarks.end insert

begin insert

Existing law provides that the Superintendent of Public Instruction may authorize the California School for the Deaf to establish and maintain a testing center for deaf and hard-of-hearing minors. Existing law provides that the purpose of the center shall be to test hearing acuity and to give such other tests as may be necessary for advising parents and school authorities concerning an appropriate educational program for the child. Existing law authorizes a pupil to be referred, as appropriate, to the California School for the Deaf, among other places, for further assessment and recommendations.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would require the State Department of Education’s Deaf and Hard of Hearing unit, the California School for the Deaf, Fremont, and the California School for the Deaf, Riverside, to jointly select language benchmarks from existing standardized norms for purposes of monitoring and tracking deaf and hard-of-hearing children’s expressive and receptive language acquisition and developmental stages toward English literacy. The bill would require the language benchmarks to be selected from the language benchmarks recommended by an ad hoc advisory committee, which the bill would establish, as provided, and would require the language benchmarks to be used by a child’s individualized family service plan (IFSP) team or individualized education program (IEP) team, as applicable, to assess the progress of the child’s language development using one or both of the dual languages of American Sign Language (ASL) and English, which would be required to be reported to the department. To the extent using the language benchmarks would impose additional duties on local educational agency officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

end insert
begin insert

The bill would require, if a child does not demonstrate progress in expressive and receptive language skills according to the applicable language benchmarks, the child’s IFSP team or IEP team, as applicable, to explain in detail the reasons why the child is not meeting the benchmarks or progressing towards the age-appropriate benchmark, and to recommend specific strategies, services, and programs that would be provided to assist the child’s success toward English literacy. To the extent this would impose additional duties on local educational agency officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would require the department to disseminate the overall goals for the language benchmarks to the parents or guardians of deaf or hard-of-hearing children, and a child’s IFSP or IEP team, and to provide materials and training to ensure appropriate language growth as part of the child’s existing IFSP or IEP in order to assist the deaf or hard-of-hearing child in becoming linguistically ready for kindergarten using one or both of the dual languages of ASL and English. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2017, to develop specific action plans and regulations to fully implement the language benchmark assessment protocol and processes.

end insert
begin insert

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

end insert
begin delete

Existing law requires the Director of Food and Agriculture and the commissioners of each county of the state, and their deputies and inspectors, under the supervision and control of the director, to enforce specified provisions governing the failure of food and agricultural officers to carry out orders and directions of the director, the enforcement of specified fruit, nut, and vegetable standards, and the maintenance of state inspection stations.

end delete
begin delete

This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions, including changing the reference from Director of Food and Agriculture to the Secretary of Food and Agriculture.

end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert. State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 56326.5 is added to the end insertbegin insertEducation Codeend insertbegin insert,
2to read:end insert

begin insert
3

begin insert56326.5.end insert  

(a) (1) The department’s Deaf and Hard of Hearing
4unit, the California School for the Deaf, Fremont, and the
5California School for the Deaf, Riverside, shall jointly select
6language benchmarks from existing standardized norms for
7purposes of monitoring and tracking deaf and hard-of-hearing
8children’s expressive and receptive language acquisition and
9developmental stages toward English literacy.

10(2) (A) The language benchmarks shall be selected from the
11language benchmarks recommended by the advisory committee
12pursuant to subdivision (c), and shall be used by a child’s
13individualized family service plan (IFSP) team or individualized
14education program (IEP) team, as applicable, to assess the
15 progress of the child’s language development using one or both
16of the dual languages of American Sign Language (ASL) and
17English, which shall be reported to the department.

18(B) On or before March 1, 2016, the department shall provide
19the advisory committee with a list of existing language benchmarks
20from existing standardized norms, along with any relevant
21information held by the department regarding those language
22benchmarks.

23(C) On or before June 1, 2016, the advisory committee shall
24recommend language benchmarks for selection pursuant to
25subdivision (a).

P4    1(D) On or before June 30, 2016, the department shall inform
2the advisory committee of which language benchmarks were
3selected.

4(3) The department shall track development stages that are
5equivalent to a child’s linguistically age-appropriate peers who
6are not deaf or hard of hearing, with the goal of assisting children
7who are deaf or hard of hearing to become kindergarten-ready.

8(b) (1) If a child does not demonstrate progress in expressive
9and receptive language skills according to the applicable language
10benchmarks, the child’s IFSP team or IEP team, as applicable,
11shall explain in detail the reasons why the child is not meeting the
12benchmarks or progressing towards the age-appropriate
13benchmark, and shall recommend specific strategies, services, and
14programs that shall be provided to assist the child’s success toward
15English literacy.

16(2) The department shall disseminate the overall goals for the
17language benchmarks to the parents or guardians of deaf or
18hard-of-hearing children, and a child’s IFSP or IEP team, and
19shall provide materials and training to ensure appropriate
20language growth as part of the child’s existing IFSP or IEP in
21order to assist the deaf or hard-of-hearing child in becoming
22linguistically ready for kindergarten using one or both of the dual
23languages of ASL and English.

24(c) (1) The Superintendent shall establish an ad hoc advisory
25committee for purposes of soliciting input from experts on the
26selection of language benchmarks for children who are deaf or
27hard of hearing that are equivalent to those for children who are
28not deaf or hard of hearing.

29(2) The advisory committee shall consist of 13 volunteers, the
30majority of whom shall be deaf or hard of hearing, and all of whom
31shall be within the field of education for the deaf and hard of
32hearing. The advisory committee shall include all of the following:

33(A) One parent of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing who
34uses the dual languages of ASL and English.

35(B) One parent of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing who
36uses only spoken English, with or without visual supplements.

37(C) One credentialed teacher of deaf and hard-of-hearing pupils
38who use the dual languages of ASL and English.

39(D) One credentialed teacher of deaf and hard-of-hearing pupils
40from a state certified nonpublic, nonsectarian public school.

P5    1(E) One expert who researches language outcomes for deaf and
2hard-of-hearing children using ASL and English.

3(F) One expert who researches language outcomes for deaf and
4hard-of-hearing children using English only.

5(G) One curriculum and instructional specialist in ASL and
6English.

7(H) One curriculum and instructional specialist in English only.

8(I) One advocate for the teaching and use of the dual languages
9of ASL and English.

10(J) One advocate for the teaching and use of English only.

11(K) One early intervention specialist who works with deaf and
12hard-of-hearing infants and toddlers using the dual languages of
13ASL and English.

14(L) One professional from the dual languages of ASL and
15English.

16(M) One professional from English only, with or without the
17use of visual supplements.

18(d) The department shall, on or before January 1, 2017, develop
19specific action plans and regulations to fully implement the
20language benchmark assessment protocol and processes.

21(e) For purposes of this section, “English” includes spoken
22English, written English, or English with the use of visual
23supplements.

end insert
24begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
25this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
26local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
27pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
284 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

end insert
begin delete
29

SECTION 1.  

Section 42651 of the Food and Agricultural Code
30 is amended to read:

31

42651.  

The secretary and the commissioners of each county
32of the state, and their deputies and inspectors, under the supervision
33and control of the secretary shall enforce this division.

34

SEC. 2.  

Section 42652 of the Food and Agricultural Code is
35amended to read:

36

42652.  

The refusal of any officer who is authorized under this
37division to carry out the orders and directions of the secretary in
38the enforcement of this division is neglect of duty. However, the
39failure of any such officer to carry out those orders and directions
P6    1shall not be neglect of duty if funds necessary to carry out those
2orders and directions are not provided.

3

SEC. 3.  

Section 42653 of the Food and Agricultural Code is
4amended to read:

5

42653.  

The secretary, through the chief of the branch of the
6department that has jurisdiction over the enforcement of this
7division, or any deputy, inspector, or agent of the department, may
8enforce and make inspections of grade, standard of quality, and
9other provisions of any fruit, nut, or vegetable marketing program
10 that is adopted under the authority of the United States or of this
11state.

12

SEC. 4.  

Section 42654 of the Food and Agricultural Code is
13amended to read:

14

42654.  

The secretary may maintain state inspection stations at
15those places as he or she deems necessary for the purpose of
16enforcing the standardization provisions of this code.

end delete


O

    98