BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 224|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  SB 224
          Author:   Liu (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/2/15  
          Vote:     27  

           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:  5-2, 4/7/15
           AYES:  Hancock, Leno, Liu, McGuire, Monning
           NOES:  Anderson, Stone

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-2, 5/28/15
           AYES:  Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
           NOES:  Bates, Nielsen

           SUBJECT:   Elderly Parole Program


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill codifies court-ordered elderly parole.


          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:

          1)Provides that in the case of any inmate sentenced to an  
            indeterminate sentence the Board of Parole Hearings (Board)  
            shall meet with each inmate during the sixth year prior to the  
            inmate's eligible parole release date for the purposes of  
            reviewing and documenting the inmates activities and conduct  
            pertinent to both parole eligibility and to the granting and  








                                                                     SB 224  
                                                                    Page  2


            withholding of postconviction credit. (Penal Code § 3041(a))

          2)Provides that one year prior to the inmates minimum eligible  
            parole release date a panel of two or more commissioners or  
            deputy commissioners shall meet with the inmate and shall  
            normally set a parole release date. (Penal Code § 3041(a))
           
           3)Provides that the release date shall be set in a manner that  
            will provide uniform terms for offenses of similar gravity and  
            magnitude with respect to their threat to the public, and that  
            will comply with the sentencing rules that the Judicial  
            Council may issue and any sentencing information relevant to  
            the setting of the parole release dates.  The Board shall  
            establish criteria for the setting of parole release dates and  
            in doing so shall consider the number of victims of crime for  
            which the inmate was sentenced and other factors in mitigation  
            or aggravation of the crime. (Penal Code § 3041 (a))

          4)Provides that one year prior to the inmate's minimum eligible  
            parole release date a panel of two or more commissioners or  
            deputy commissioners shall again meet with the inmate and,  
            except as provided, normally set a parole release date as  
            provided in Section 3041.5. (Penal Code § 3041(a))

          5)According to the Three-Judge Court Order filed February 10,  
            2014, the California Department of Corrections and  
            Rehabilitation (CDCR) must "[f]inalize and implement a new  
            parole process whereby inmates who are 60 years of age or  
            older and have served a minimum of twenty-five years of their  
            sentence will be referred to the Board of Parole Hearings to  
            determine suitability for parole." (February 10, 2014 Order,  
            2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD PC, 3-Judge Court, Coleman v. Brown,  
            Plata v. Brown)

          This bill:

          1)Provides that a prisoner shall be considered for parole under  
            the Elderly Parole Program if she or she meets both of the  
            following conditions:

             a)   The prisoner is 60 years of age or older; and,

             b)   The prisoner has served 25 years of continued  
               incarcerations on his or her sentence including time served  







                                                                     SB 224  
                                                                    Page  3


               prior to sentencing.

          2)Provides that when considering the release of a prisoner under  
            elderly parole the Board shall give special consideration to  
            whether age, time served, and diminished physical condition,  
            if any have reduced the elderly prisoner's risk for future  
            violence.

          3)Provides that if the prisoner is found suitable for parole  
            under the Elderly Parole Program the Board shall release the  
            individual.

          4)Provides that elderly parole does not apply to prisoners  
            sentenced to death or to imprisonment for life without the  
            possibility of parole.
          
          Background
          
          In Coleman v. Brown, Plata v. Brown in which the plaintiffs are  
          seeking a reduction in the California prison population, the  
          Three-Judge Court Order of February 10, 2014, required CDCR to  
          create an "elderly parole" program in which prisoners who have  
          reached the age of 60 and served 25 years will be considered for  
          parole.  The elderly parole hearings began on October 1, 2014.   
          CDCR's February 2015 status report in response to the February  
          10, 2014 court order states the progress of the elderly parole  
          program stating:

               Parole process for inmates 60 years of age or older  
               having served at least 25 years: The Board continues  
               to schedule eligible inmates for hearings who were not  
               already in the Board's hearing cycle, including  
               inmates sentenced to determinate terms. The Board has  
               scheduled 549 hearings for inmates eligible for  
               elderly parole, resulting in 115 grants, 247 denials,  
               and 26 stipulations to unsuitability. The remaining  
               159 scheduled cases were waived by the inmate,  
               postponed, continued, or cancelled. ."(Defendants'  
               February 2015 Status Report In Response to February  
               10, 2014 Order, 2:90-cv-00520 KJM DAD PC, 3-Judge  
               Court, Coleman v. Brown, Plata v. Brown).

          The age 60 was determined because there is a significant  
          reduction in crimes committed by those over 60. According to  







                                                                     SB 224  
                                                                    Page  4


          felony arrest and CDCR admissions data by age:

               In California, individuals age 60 or over were  
               responsible for the lowest percentage of all felony  
               arrests of all age groups in 2012, with the exception  
               of children under the age of 10.  Individuals age 60  
               or over were responsible for 1.9% of all felony  
               arrests. 

          While the data shows that there are still 32,980 felony arrests  
          of people 50-59 years of age those numbers drop 7,454 at age 60.  
          (http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/BOPH/docs/Policy/2012_California_Arrest_a 
          nd_CDCR_Admissions_Data_by_Age_Final.pdf)

          This bill codifies the current "elderly parole" program. 



          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, no near-term  
          fiscal impact, as the provisions of this bill codify existing  
          practice. To the extent the CDCR would otherwise not continue to  
          administer the program once federal receivership is lifted,  
          could potentially result in significant ongoing future  
          operational costs and offsetting cost savings for releases to  
          parole.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified  6/1/15)


          ACLU
          AllCare Alliance
          American Friends Service Committee
          A New PATH (Parents for Addiction Treatment and Healing)
          A New Way of Life Re-Entry Project
          California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
          California Catholic Conference, Inc.
          California Coalition for Women Prisoners
          California Commission on Aging
          California Families Against Solitary Confinement
          California Prison Watch







                                                                     SB 224  
                                                                    Page  5


          California Public Defenders Association
          Californians for Safety and Justice
          Californians United for a Responsible Budget
          Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
          Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice 
          Community United Against Violence
          Courage Campaign
          Dignity and Power Now
          Drug Policy Alliance
          Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
          Facts Education and Projects
          Fair Chance Project
          Forward Together
          Friends Committee on Legislation of California
          Hunger Action Los Angeles
          Inland Congregations United for Change
          JFK Democratic Club of Sacramento
          Justice Not Jails
          Justice Now
          Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
          Life Support Alliance
          Los Angeles Community Action Network
          Los Angeles Regional Reentry Partnership
          Match Two, Prisoner Outreach Ministry
          National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
          Older Women's League
          Prison Law Office
          Prison Policy Initiative
          Root & Rebound
          Senior and Disability Action
          Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet
          Starting Over, Inc.
          Time for Change Foundation
          U.S. Law Enforcement Chaplains Corps
          Western Regional Advocacy Project
          Women's Council of the CA Chapter of the National Association of  
               Social
            Workers
          Youth Justice Coalition
          Numerous individuals


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified  6/1/15)








                                                                     SB 224  
                                                                    Page  6



          Alameda County District Attorney
          Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs 
          Association of Deputy District Attorneys
          California College and University Police Chiefs Association
          California Correctional Supervisors Organization
          California District Attorneys Association
          California Narcotic Officers Association
          California Police Chiefs Association
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Crime Victims United
          Los Angeles Police Protective League
          Riverside Sheriffs' Association
          Sacramento County District Attorney
          San Diego County District Attorney


          Prepared by:Mary Kennedy / PUB. S. / 
          6/2/15 22:33:50


                                   ****  END  ****