BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 236|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 236
          Author:   Beall (D)
          Amended:  6/24/15  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE:  9-0, 5/5/15
           AYES:  Beall, Allen, Bates, Galgiani, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza,  
            Roth, Wieckowski
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cannella, Gaines

           SENATE FLOOR:  36-0, 5/11/15 (Consent)
           AYES:  Allen, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Galgiani, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill,  
            Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza,  
            Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan,  
            Pavley, Roth, Runner, Stone, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Anderson, De León, Liu

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  71-4, 8/27/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Public streets, highways, and public service  
                     easements


          SOURCE:    City of San Jose

          DIGEST:   This bill permits the legislative body of the City of  
          San Jose to summarily vacate a public service easement located  
          between Casselino Drive and Mullinex Way that is impassable for  
          vehicular travel, if the legislative body finds that the  
          vacation will protect the public safety or otherwise serve the  
          public interest and convenience.

          Assembly Amendments delete the applicability of this bill to  
          streets and highways and therefore narrow the application to  








                                                                     SB 236  
                                                                    Page  2



          just a public service easement. 

          ANALYSIS:
          
          Existing law:

          1)Authorizes a local agency to summarily vacate a public service  
            easement under one of the following conditions:

             a)   The public service easement has not been used for its  
               intended purpose for a prolonged period;

             b)   The date of the public easement dedication is at least a  
               year prior to, but less than five years from, the date of  
               the proposed vacation, and the easement has not been used  
               continuously since that date; or  

             c)   The easement has been superseded by relocation and there  
               are no other public facilities located within the easement.

          2)Prohibits summary vacation of a public easement if there are  
            in-place public utility facilities that are in use and would  
            be affected by the vacation.

          3)Sets forth procedures local agencies are to follow to vacate  
            or reserve easements.

          This bill: 

          1)Authorizes the City of San Jose, until January 1, 2018, to  
            summarily vacate a public service easement located between two  
            specific streets if it finds that the vacation will protect  
            the public safety or otherwise serve the public interest and  
            convenience.

          2)Authorizes the City to reserve and except from the vacation an  
            easement to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove, and  
            renew a non-vehicular pathway for public use.

          3)Makes legislative findings that the need for this special law  
            is justified because of the "unique circumstances" facing the  
            City of San Jose with regard to the public service easement.  








                                                                     SB 236  
                                                                    Page  3




          Comments
          
          Purpose of the bill.  According to the City of San Jose,  
          Communications Hill, located in the heart of San Jose, is a  
          growing community overlooking the Santa Clara Valley.  Its  
          central attraction is a 200-step staircase leading to the top of  
          the hill that has drawn visitors from throughout the city for  
          outdoor workouts.  The staircase and its views have also  
          attracted bad actors who engage in illegal drug use and public  
          drinking, litter, commit acts of vandalism, and hold noisy  
          events late into the night.  The hill's popularity has also  
          meant more traffic and scarce parking, causing consternation  
          amongst the residents who live near it.  This bill permits the  
          City to terminate the public use of this staircase and therefore  
          permit the City to enact curfews and other regulations.

          Unique circumstances.  The City of San Jose has struggled to  
          respond to the growing number of complaints and nuisance  
          violations on Communications Hill, which transpire primarily at  
          night.  This staircase was dedicated as a public service  
          easement, and, due to the fact that the staircase is open to the  
          public, the City must allow the sidewalk to be accessible at all  
          times.  

          Current statutory authority permits a local government to  
          summarily terminate the public use of a public easement;  
          however, the City of San Jose does not meet the requirements  
          necessary to utilize these existing processes.  This bill  
          resolves these public safety issues by permitting the City of  
          San Jose to vacate, or terminate the public right to use, the  
          staircase on Communications Hill located between Casselino Drive  
          and Mullinex Way under limited circumstances and allow the City  
          to establish a public trail in its place.  Public trails do not  
          have to remain accessible for public use and may therefore have  
          curfews imposed upon them.  This bill also allows the City to  
          continue to maintain the staircase.  

          Limited applicability.  This bill has a sunset of January 1,  
          2018, and will be repealed at that time.

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  








                                                                     SB 236  
                                                                    Page  4



          Com.:NoLocal:    No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/27/15)


          City of San Jose (source)
          Strangis Properties
          Tuscany Hills Homeowners' Association Board of Directors


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/27/15)


          None received

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  71-4, 8/27/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta,  
            Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez,  
            Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd,  
            Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson,  
            Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández,  
            Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine,  
            Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,  
            Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Perea, Quirk,  
            Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth,  
            Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Williams,  
            Wood, Atkins
          NOES:  Travis Allen, Beth Gaines, Harper, Melendez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eggman, Frazier, Mathis, Patterson, Wilk


          Prepared by:Alison Dinmore / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
          8/28/15 14:02:21


                                   ****  END  ****


          










                                                                     SB 236  
                                                                    Page  5