BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 239| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 239 Author: Hertzberg (D) Amended: 6/1/15 Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 5-0, 4/29/15 AYES: Hertzberg, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Pavley NO VOTE RECORDED: Nguyen, Moorlach SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/28/15 AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza NOES: Bates, Nielsen SUBJECT: Local services: contracts: fire protection services SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill requires a local agency formation commission (LAFCO) to review a contract or agreement for new or extended fire service outside of an existing service area. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, delegates the Legislature's power to SB 239 Page 2 control the boundaries of cities and special districts to LAFCOs. 2) Requires that cities and districts must get a LAFCO's written approval before they can serve territory outside their boundaries (AB 1335, Gotch, Chapter 1307, Statutes of 1993). However, LAFCO approval is not required for contracts or agreements solely involving two or more public agencies where the public service to be provided is an alternative to, or substitute for, public services already being provided by an existing public service provider and where the level of service to be provided is consistent with the level of service contemplated by the exiting service provider. 3) Allows cities and fire protection districts to contract with a county to provide fire protection services within the local agency's jurisdiction. 4) Allows local governments to contract with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to provide fire protection services. This bill: 1) Requires a public agency to obtain a LAFCO's approval to provide new or extended services under a fire protection contract, pursuant to a specified approval process. 2) Defines a "fire protection contract" as a contract or agreement that: a) Is for the exercise of new or extended fire protection services outside a public agency's current service area; b) Is executed pursuant to specified statutes allowing local governments and CALFIRE to enter into fire SB 239 Page 3 protection service contracts and agreements; and, c) Does either of the following: i) Transfers responsibility for providing services in more than 25% of the service area of any public agency affected by the contract or agreement. ii) Changes the employment status of more than 25% of the employees of any public agency affected by the contract or agreement. 3) Applies the definition of a fire protection contract to a contract or agreement that, in combination with other contracts or agreements, meets the bill's definition of a fire protection contract. 4) Requires a public agency to initiate a request for LAFCO approval of services provided under a fire protection contract by adopting a resolution of application as follows: a) The legislative body of a public agency that is not a state agency must adopt a resolution of application proposing to provide new or extended services outside the public agency's current service area. b) The director of a state agency must initiate an application, which must be approved by the Director of Finance. 5) Requires that the legislative body of a public agency or the director of a state agency must do all of the following before submitting a resolution of application to the LAFCO: a) Conduct an open and public hearing on the resolution, SB 239 Page 4 and b) Do either of the following: i) Obtain and submit with the resolution a written agreement validated and executed by each affected public agency and recognized employee organization that represents firefighters of the existing and proposed service providers consenting to the proposed change of organization. ii) At least 30 days before the public hearing, provide written notice to each affected public agency and recognized employee organization that represents firefighters of the existing and proposed service providers of the proposed fire protection contract and submit a copy of each written notice with the resolution of application. The notice must include a full copy of the proposed contract. 6) Requires that a proposal for a change of organization must be submitted with a plan prepared pursuant to specified statutory requirements. The plan must include: a) A total cost estimate for providing new or extended services. b) The estimated cost of the new or extended services to customers. c) An identification of existing service providers and the potential fiscal impact to the customers of those existing providers. d) A plan for financing the exercise of the new or extended services. SB 239 Page 5 e) Alternatives for the exercise of the new or extended services. f) An enumeration and description of the new or extended fire protection services proposed to be extended to the affected territory. g) The level and range of new or extended fire protection services. h) An indication of when the new or extended fire protection services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory. i) An indication of any improvements or upgrades to structures, roads, sewer, and water facilities, or other conditions the public agency would impose or require within the affected territory of the fire protection contract is completed. 7) Requires a public agency to cause to be prepared by contract an independent comprehensive fiscal analysis that reviews and documents: a) The costs to the public agency that has proposed to provide new or extended services during the three fiscal years following a public agency entering into a contract to provide new or extended services outside its current service area by contract or agreement, in accordance with specified requirements. b) The revenues of the public agency that has proposed a new or extended service outside its current service area during the three fiscal years following the effective date of a contract or agreement with another public agency to SB 239 Page 6 provide a new or extended service. c) The effects on the costs and revenues of any affected public agency, including the public agency proposing to provide the new or extended service, during the three fiscal years that the new or extended service will be provided. d) Any other information and analysis needed to support the findings that a LAFCO must make to approve services under a fire protection contract. 8) Requires the clerk of the legislative body of a public agency or the director of a state agency adopting a resolution of application to file a certified copy of the resolution with the LAFCO executive officer. This bill specifies how a LAFCO must process resolutions of application submitted to the executive officer. 9) Requires a LAFCO to review and approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions a fire protection reorganization contract after a public hearing called and held for that purpose. This bill allows an applicant to request reconsideration if a contract is disapproved or approved with conditions. 10)Generally prohibits a LAFCO from approving an application unless the LAFCO determines that the public agency will have sufficient revenues to carry out the exercise of the new or extended services outside its current area. However, if the LAFCO has determined that the public agency will not have sufficient revenue to provide the proposed new or different functions or class of services, this bill allows a LAFCO to approve an application if the LAFCO conditions its approval on the concurrent approval of sufficient revenue sources pursuant to state law. In approving an application, the LAFCO must provide that if the revenue sources are not approved, the public agency's authority to provide new or extended services must not be exercised. SB 239 Page 7 11)Prohibits a LAFCO from approving an application for approval of a fire protection reorganization contract unless the LAFCO makes specified findings, based on the entire record. 12)Specifies the manner in which a LAFCO executive officer must provide public notice by mail, in a newspaper, and on the Internet, of a hearing to review an application for approval of a fire protection contract. This bill allows a LAFCO to continue a hearing and requires that a LAFCO must hear and consider oral or written testimony presented by any affected local agency, affected county, or any interested person who appears at the hearing. 13)Specifies that a fire protection contract is exempt from the statute that governs LAFCOs' approval of extraterritorial service contracts. 14)Directs that its provisions must not be construed to abrogate a public agency's obligations under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. 15)Makes additional technical and conforming changes to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act. Background Some of contracts and cooperative agreements for fire protection services result in a local department shifting all responsibility for providing fire protections services to a county or CAL FIRE, while others supplement existing local fire services with additional services provided by a county or CAL FIRE. However, because these contracts and agreements solely involve public agencies and existing services, they are not subject to LAFCO approval. SB 239 Page 8 In some communities that recently entered into contracts or agreements that shifted the responsibility for providing fire protection services from one public agency to another, the agreements have generated controversy while failing to produce anticipated cost savings and administrative efficiencies. As a result, firefighters' labor union officials want the Legislature to require LAFCOs to give fire protection service contracts and agreements more scrutiny than is required under current law. Comments Purpose of the bill. When a contract or agreement between two public agencies makes substantial changes to the administration of fire protection services in a community, it deserves to be scrutinized by LAFCO in a manner that is similar to how a detachment and annexation of fire protection services would be scrutinized under current law. When the Legislature enacted the 1993 Gotch bill requiring LAFCO review of some extraterritorial service contracts, it did so in response to concerns that local governments were using service contracts to circumvent LAFCO review of major changes to local service delivery. However, the review requirement for extraterritorial service contracts contained a substantial loophole for contracts that only involved public agencies. This bill will narrow that loophole. Some recent fire protection service contracts between public agencies have resulted in costly litigation and generated deep divisions among community members. Other agreements have been jeopardized by public officials' reliance on financial data that later was determined to be inaccurate. Problems like these can be avoided by providing more opportunities for the public to review and consider independent analyses of proposed changes to fire service delivery in their communities. By requiring a public agency to submit a plan for extended services for fire protection to LAFCO for review and approval, this bill will ensure that the details of service delivery and costs are thoroughly and independently examined, which will benefit the residents, the public agency and the firefighters in all of the affected areas. Local control. Local voters elect county supervisors, city council members, and special district board members to make SB 239 Page 9 public policy in response to local needs. Local elected officials strive to provide their communities' residents with the best services at the most reasonable cost. They have to answer to residents who are displeased with the quality and cost of their services. As a result, a decision to enter into a contract with another public agency to provide fire protection services is a decision that elected officials make only after considering the fiscal, administrative, and service delivery implications for their communities. By requiring LAFCO review of fire protection reorganization contracts, this bill diminishes local officials' autonomy to contract for fire protection services in the manner that they determine will best serve their constituents. Next in line? Fire protection services aren't the only kind of public service that local agencies provide outside of their boundaries pursuant to contracts with other public agencies. Local agencies commonly contract for law enforcement services, utility services, and park and recreation services, among others. Enacting this bill may invite requests from other interest groups for LAFCOs to more carefully scrutinize other types of contracts for services provided outside of existing service areas. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Unknown increased General Fund costs to the CAL FIRE, likely in the low hundreds of thousands annually, to comply with specified administrative requirements prior to contracting with local agencies for fire protection services. Unknown, potentially significant impact on CAL FIRE fire protection costs (General Fund). SUPPORT: (Verified5/29/15) California Professional Firefighters SB 239 Page 10 CALFIRE Local 2881 California Labor Federation OPPOSITION: (Verified5/29/15) Alameda County LAFCO Apple Valley Fire Protection District Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District California Association of LAFCOs California Ambulance Association California Building Industry Association California Special Districts Association California State Association of Counties Chino Valley Fire District Contra Costa County LAFCO Covelo Fire Protection District Happy Valley Fire Protection District Hesperia Recreation & Park District Fire Districts Association of California Fresno County Fire Protection District Hesperia Recreation and Park District League of California Cities Los Angeles County LAFCO Madera County Board of Supervisors Monterey County Business Council Monterey County LAFCO Monterey County Regional Fire District Nevada County LAFCO North County Fire Protection District North Tahoe Fire Protection District Orange County LAFCO Riverside County LAFCO Running Springs Water District Rural County Representatives of California San Diego County LAFCO San Luis Obispo County LAFCO San Mateo County LAFCO Santa Cruz County LAFCO Saratoga Fire District Shasta Lake Fire Protection District Squaw Valley Public Service District Tuolumne Fire District SB 239 Page 11 Prepared by:Brian Weinberger / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119 6/1/15 18:23:26 **** END ****