BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session SB 284 (Cannella) Version: April 22, 2015 Hearing Date: April 28, 2015 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No RD SUBJECT Engineering and land surveying: limited liability partnerships DESCRIPTION Existing law authorizes licensed engineers and land surveyors to organize and operate as limited liability partnerships (LLPs), subject to certain insurance liability coverage requirements, as specified, until January 1, 2016. This bill would extend, until January 1, 2021, existing law that allows engineering and land surveying firms to form limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and foreign limited liability partnerships to engage in the practice of engineering and land surveying. BACKGROUND In 1994, the Legislature enacted the Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company (LLC) Act, under which a foreign or domestic limited liability company is prohibited from rendering professional services in this state unless expressly authorized under applicable provisions of law. Professional services are those services for which a license, certification, or registration is required under specified statutes. Beginning with the creation of limited liability partnerships (LLPs) in 1995 by SB 513 (Calderon, Ch. 679, Stats. 1995), however, sponsored and supported by law and accountancy firms, certain licensed professionals have been able to enjoy limited liability protections, with tax advantages similar to LLCs, upon SB 284 (Cannella) Page 2 of ? meeting specified conditions. Generally, operation as an LLP offers both liability and tax advantages by combining the limited liability attributes of a corporation with the federal tax advantage of operating as a general partnership. For liability purposes, partners in an LLP have no personal liability for the torts of the other partners in the partnership and stand to lose only the amount he or she has contributed or is obligated to contribute under the terms of the partnership agreement. In a general partnership, however, the partner would be jointly and severally liable with the other partners for any tort of the partnership, including a tort of one of the individual partners. In both settings, the individual partner who committed the wrongdoing would be personally liable for his or her tort. The original rationale for the exclusion of professional services under the Beverly-Killea LLC Act was that service providers who harm others by their misconduct, incompetence or negligence should not be able to limit their liability by operating as an LLC (or LLP) and thus become potentially judgment-proof. In authorizing licensed attorney and accountant firms to form LLPs, SB 513 conditioned the authorization upon a condition that the LLP purchase a liability insurance policy or maintained bank deposits of at least $100,000 per limited liability partner (or an aggregate of not less than $500,000 for fewer than five partners and not more than $5 million for all others). Moreover, only partnerships with a net worth of $10 million or more were allowed to become LLPs. Subsequently, in 1998, the Legislature allowed for architects to form LLPs under the same conditions as accountants and attorneys, for a trial period of ten years (AB 469 (Cardoza, Ch. 504, Stats. 1998)). In 2006, the sunset for architects was extended to 2012, and the liability coverage requirement was increased to $1,000,000 for partnerships of five or fewer licensees, and an additional $100,000 per additional licensee up to a maximum of $5,000,000. (AB 2914 (Leno, Ch. 426, Stats. 2006).) In 2007, SB 414 (Corbett, Ch. 80, Stats. 2007) updated the liability coverage requirement for accountants and attorneys. Similarly, bills that have authorized professional service providers to form LLCs have also required those businesses to maintain an adequate level of liability insurance. (See Prior Legislation.) Relevant to this bill, in 2003, AB 1265 (Benoit, 2003) was SB 284 (Cannella) Page 3 of ? introduced to also authorize engineers and land surveyors to practice within the scope of their licensure as an LLP with the same insurance liability coverage requirements as that of architects. This Committee held that bill due to concerns regarding inadequate insurance coverage. Subsequently, in 2010, SB 1008 (Padilla, Ch. 634, Stats. 2010) was enacted to allow engineers and land surveyors to organize as LLPs and required those LLPs to carry the same insurance liability amounts as those required of accountants and architects. Those provisions included a sunset of January 1, 2016. This bill would now extend the sunset for engineer and land surveyor LLPs, and the requisite liability insurance provisions, by an additional five years, to January 1, 2021. This bill was heard in the Senate Business, Professions & Economic Development Committee on April 20, 2015, and passed out on a vote of 9-0. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law provides that a partner in a registered limited liability partnership (LLP) is not liable or accountable, directly or indirectly, including by way of indemnification, contribution, assessment, or otherwise, for debts, obligations, or liabilities of or chargeable to the partnership or another partner in the partnership, whether arising in tort, contract, or otherwise, that are incurred, created, or assumed by the partnership while the partnership is a registered limited liability partnership, by reason of being a partner or acting in the conduct of the business or activities of the partnership. (Corp. Code Sec. 16306(c).) Existing law includes, along with the practice of architecture, public accountancy, and law, the practices of engineering and land surveying in the definitions of "foreign limited liability partnership," "registered limited liability partnership," and "professional limited liability partnership services." (Corp. Code Secs. 16100(6)(A), 16100(8)(A), 16100(14).) Existing law requires that every registered LLP and foreign LLP provide security for claims, as specified. (Corp. Code Sec. 16956.) Existing law requires all LLPs, at the time of registration and SB 284 (Cannella) Page 4 of ? continuously while transacting intrastate business to provide security for claims, as specified. For claims based upon acts, errors, or omissions arising out of the practice of engineering or the practice of land surveying, a registered LLP or foreign LLP providing engineering or land surveying services must comply with one, some combination as specified, of the following: maintaining a policy or policies of insurance against liability imposed on or against it by law for damages arising out of claims as follows: o the total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance for partnerships with five or fewer licensees rendering professional services on behalf of the partnership shall not be less than two million dollars ($2,000,000); o for partnerships with more than five licensees rendering professional services on behalf of the partnership, an additional one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of liability coverage shall be obtained for each additional licensee; o however, the total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance is not required to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000); or in lieu of insurance coverage as specified above, maintaining in trust or bank escrow, cash, bank certificates of deposit, United States Treasury obligations, bank letters of credit, or bonds of insurance or surety companies as security for payment of liabilities imposed by law for damages arising out of all claims as follows: o the maximum amount of security for partnerships with five or fewer licensees rendering professional services on behalf of the partnership shall not be less than two million dollars ($2,000,000); o for partnerships with more than five licensees rendering professional services on behalf of the partnership, an additional one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of security shall be obtained for each additional licensee; o however, the maximum amount of security is not required to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000). (Corp. Code Sec. 16956(a)(4)(A)-(B).) Existing law provides that the impairment or exhaustion of the aggregate limit of liability by amounts paid under the policy in connection with the settlement, discharge, or defense of claims applicable to a designated period (not to exceed 12 months) shall not require the partnership to acquire additional SB 284 (Cannella) Page 5 of ? insurance for that designated period. (Corp Code Sec. 16956(a)(4)(A).) Existing law provides that the partnership remains in compliance with this section (mandating security for claims) during a calendar year, notwithstanding amounts paid during that calendar year from the accounts, funds, Treasury obligations, letters of credit, or bonds in defending, settling, or discharging specified claims, provided that the amount of those accounts, funds, Treasury obligations, letters of credit, or bonds was at least the amount specified in the preceding sentence as of the first business day of that calendar year. (Corp Code Sec. 16956(a)(4)(B).) Existing law requires the LLP to confirm, as specified, that as of the most recently completed fiscal year of the partnership, the LLP had a net worth equal to or exceeding $10 million. (Corp Code Sec. 16956(a)(4)(D).) Existing law provides that unless the partnership has satisfied the requirement that its minimum net worth exceeds $10 million, each partner of a registered LLP or foreign LLP providing engineering or land surveying services, by virtue of that person's status as a partner, automatically guarantees payment of the difference between the maximum amount of security required for the partnership and the required security in the policy or polices specified above, provided that the aggregate amount paid by all partners under these guarantees shall not exceed the difference. (Corp. Code Sec. 16956(a)(4)(C).) This bill would extend the sunset on the engineering and land surveying LLP provisions above until January 1, 2021. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The author writes: Next January, without SB 284, engineers and land surveyors up and down the state will no longer have the flexibility they need to form a Limited Liability Partnership [LLP], should they desire to do so. [ . . . ] 3.4 million California small businesses account for 99 percent of the state's employers and employ 52 percent of the SB 284 (Cannella) Page 6 of ? workforce. Small businesses are the backbone to any economy. Small business owners know their business best and should have every tool available to them to be successful in California. Engineers and land surveyors are a foundation for business[ ] growth in California and continuing to extend the same flexibility to form limited liability partnerships as architects allows them to contribute to business and job growth throughout the state. The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) of California, sponsor of this bill, notes that the vast majority of other states allow professional services to be engaged in these LLP business structures. ACEC writes that "[p]roviding options to business makes sense. Allowing engineering and land surveying firms the option to structure as LLPs [provides] additional flexibility that will encourage business expansion in some instances, while boosting project delivery options. SB 284 offers flexibility in business and encourages innovative partnerships that will allow California to better meet our growing infrastructure needs." In support of the bill, the California Land Surveyors Association (CLSA) writes that the bill enhances the private practice of and surveying by providing an alternative method of organizing a land surveying firm. CLSA adds that bill is not only important to facilitate a multi-state engineering or land surveying firm (as virtually every other state allows licensed professionals and design professions to organize as a limited liability company and the bill would allow parity among the partners in various states), but that it also should be noted "that the provisions of Senate Bill 284 continue the balanced approach required of the current professions that enjoy LLP status. Although LLP status provides for a limitation on liability, it also requires that a land surveying firm that chooses the LLP form of business organization maintain certain liability insurance thresholds, pledge collateral, or maintain a $10 million minimum net worth that will protect the public in the event injury is caused by land surveying service." 2. Important role of insurance minimums and sunset reviews California's LLP law has always sought to strike a balance between allowing professional licensed service providers to operate in a business model that offers both tax and liability-limiting advantages while preserving to an appropriate SB 284 (Cannella) Page 7 of ? degree the ability of a party injured by professional negligence to recover damages for that injury. Thus, an insurance requirement has always been imposed upon professional licensees that seek to operate as an LLP. The rationale behind the insurance requirement is to ensure that a person who is injured by a LLP is likely able to collect his or her judgment. Because of the limited liability attributes of a LLP, the injured person can no longer rely on the joint and several liability of the partners and their personal assets, but must look to the assets of the LLP. To ensure adequate but not necessarily complete recovery in all claims, the insurance requirement is added as a condition of being permitted to operate as a LLP. Thus, even if the LLP has few assets because the profits are regularly distributed to its members, the required insurance is available to pay tort damages. The difficulty has always been in the setting of the minimum level of required insurance in an appropriate amount. While the law has never sought to cover all potential claims, since that would obviate the need and benefit for operating as a LLP, the law has always sought to ensure that most predictable claims are covered. Hence, committee staff has always sought and used the available insurance claims data in proposing the recommended minimum insurance requirements. For example, when the original LLP law for architects was enacted in 1998, the scant insurance data then available (see also, Comment 3, below) did not provide a clear picture of the types and amounts of judgments assessed against architects for professional negligence. According to this Committee's analysis of AB 469 (Cardoza, Ch. 504, Stats. 1998), the available information suggested that the average payout on claims against architects between 1993 and 1997 was about $32,000. By the time the architects' LLP authorization and insurance provisions came up for sunset review ten years later, some additional information became available (though that information was still not complete). This Committee's analysis noted at the time that, according to the data gathered by the sponsors from insurers representing less than 50 percent of the market, the average payment of claims against small firms with gross billings of $500,000 had at least doubled, averaging $65,526 in the preceding 10 years. The information further reflected that for firms with between $500,000 and $5 million in gross billings, the average payout over the 10 years studied was SB 284 (Cannella) Page 8 of ? $141,699, with the average reaching $216,279 in 2004 and subsiding lightly to $206,335 in 2005. Further, for firms with gross billings over $5 million, which likely involve firms with a large number of architects, the average claims paid over the 10-year period was $422,657, with a spike in 1998 of $1.6 million and a low in 2004 of $119,970. (Under the LLP law, a 50 licensee architectural firm would be required to carry the maximum $5 million in insurance.) In addition, the limited claims data reflected that the 10 largest claims paid on behalf of California architects ranged between $955,735 and $2,302,214, with six of those claims being at or over $1,000,000. Based upon that information, this Committee was able to determine that the proposed increase in the minimum insurance levels for architect LLPs from $500,000 to $1,000,000 for LLP firms with five or fewer licensees was appropriate and that a "step-up" for larger LLPs (namely, an additional $100,000 per additional licensee after the first five licensees, up to a $5,000,000 maximum) was also appropriate. Accordingly, as discussed in Comment 3, one of the significant policy questions raised by the proposed sunset extension is whether the existing insurance liability requirements for engineer and land surveyor LLPs are sufficient. 3. History of engineer and land surveyor LLP authorization and the resulting insurance minimums This bill seeks to extend the sunset on engineer and land surveyor LLPs, which were first authorized five years ago, after two prior attempts failed. AB 1265 (Benoit, 2003) was the first attempt to add engineers and land surveyors to the list of professions that could organize as LLPs and was analyzed extensively with regard to the insurance coverage requirements. That bill would have only have provided for minimum insurance liability coverage of $500,000 for firms of five or less partners, and would have set the insurance minimum at $5 million for bigger firms. The bill was ultimately held in this Committee. Subsequently, in 2005, a second bill was brought to authorize engineers and land surveyor LLPs, AB 180 (Horton, 2005). That bill would have allowed SB 284 (Cannella) Page 9 of ? engineers and land surveyors to operate as LLPs if the partnership maintained at least $1.5 million in insurance for a LLP with up to five licensed persons rendering professional services, and $2 million for a LLP with up to 10 licensed persons rendering professional services. For partnerships with more than 10 licensed persons rendering professional services on behalf of the LLP, the bill would have required an additional $1 million for every one to five additional licensed persons rendering professional services on behalf of the partnership. However, the total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance for the LLP was not required to exceed $7.5 million, less amounts paid in defending, settling, or discharging claims, provided that a minimum of two-thirds of each policy or policies of insurance is reserved for payment of claims and not more than one-third of each policy or policies of insurance may be used for payment of costs for defending, settling, or discharging claims. When this Committee considered AB 180's $1 million dollar proposed insurance levels, it noted that the insurance data provided at the time demonstrated that highest claims paid in [five] of the last 10 years surveyed exceeded $1,000,000. The highest were $3.5 million in 2002, $1.45 million in 1995, $1.15 million in 1994, $1,100,000 in 2003, and $1,086,500 in 1998. There also was no data available for claims resulting from the recent disasters involving landslides in Southern California. Complicating the analysis for AB 180 was the fact that data showing the frequency of such high payouts was requested but denied by all but one insurer on the grounds that such information is proprietary. That one insurer, representing about 40 [percent] of the market, indicated that in the past five years, one claim exceeded $1.5 million (but did not indicate by how much), two claims were within the $1 million to $1.25 range, and two were within the $500,000 to $1 million range (out of 234 claims). (See Sen. Judiciary Com. analysis of AB 180 (2004-2005 Reg. Session) pp. 6-7.) AB 180 passed this Committee and the bill was amended to increase the insurance levels to $1.5 million in light of concerns over the ability of injured parties to be able to collect judgments against engineer and land surveying firms operating as LLPs, but the bill was ultimately gutted and amended into a different topic. Finally, in 2010, SB 1008 (Padilla, Ch. 634, Stats. 2010) succeeded in adding engineer and land surveyors to the list of authorized LLPs. As originally SB 284 (Cannella) Page 10 of ? heard in this Committee, the bill would have provided for $1 million minimum liability coverage. At the time, this Committee's analysis noted based on available data, that under those terms, only five of the highest claims would have been covered. Accordingly, to address that issue and ensure that the insurance liability coverage could cover all but one of the largest claims, this Committee raised the minimum insurance levels to $1.5 million dollars. By the end of the legislative process, the minimum level was raised to $2 million dollars, as is reflected under current law. At this time, staff notes that no information has been provided to this Committee with regard to the insurance claims in the five years since SB 1008 authorized engineer and land surveyor LLPs. As introduced, this bill would have repealed the sunset on both the LLP authorization and the requisite insurance levels mandated as a condition of the LLP authorization. As approved by the Senate Business, Professions & Economic Development Committee, the bill instead would extend the sunset by five years to January 1, 2021. Staff notes that incomplete data is not a new problem. In 1998, the Senate Judiciary Committee analysis for AB 469 stated: The scanty available claims data provided by the sponsor does not provide a clear picture of the types of judgments assessed against architects for professional negligence. (See AB 469 (Cardoza, Ch. 504, Stats. 1998), extending the sunset for architecture LLPs.) Again in 2001, that precise information is not available. (AB 1596 (Shelley, Ch. 595, Stats. 2001).) And in 2006, only partial information was made available when the architecture LLP authorization once again came up for review. (AB 2914 (Leno, Ch. 426, Stats. 2006).) As noted then, at the very least, the lack of complete data justifies the policy of extending the sunset for the LLP law for moderate periods of time, to enable periodic review, rather than its complete repeal. This bill would appear to be consistent with that policy, by extending the sunset by five years. That being said, given the lack of information to help evaluate the efficacy of the insurance minimums set in 2010 (despite the availability of claims data for engineers and land surveyors in SB 284 (Cannella) Page 11 of ? the past), it may be appropriate to reduce the proposed sunset even further, to three years. This would provide the sponsors time to acquire the necessary information to better inform a longer sunset (or repeal of the sunset), without disrupting existing LLPs in the interim. Furthermore, if the data were to show that insurance amounts are currently insufficient to cover the majority of claims, the shorter sunset will ensure that the Legislature is able to appropriately respond to such an issue. Suggested Amendment : Replace the January 1, 2021 sunset in the bill with January 1, 2019 sunset 4. Potential future issue The current insurance coverage required in all the LLP laws provide that "the impairment or exhaustion of the aggregate limit of liability by amounts paid under the policy in connection with the settlement, discharge, or defense of claims applicable to a designated period shall not require the partnership to acquire additional insurance for that designated period." In short, the required insurance is a "wasting assets" policy that could well be depleted by defense costs and multiple claims in a coverage year so that the more difficult claims to resolve, usually the larger claims, could result in no payment at all to the tort victim because the required insurance assets for the covered year has been exhausted. Especially in light of the current lack of data, the issue of the "wasting asset" insurance policy and whether there should be an obligation on LLPs to replenish the policy during the course of the year deserves re-visiting in the future as defense and claims costs are likely to increase year after year. Support : American Institute of Architects, California Council (AIACC); California Land Surveyors Association (CLSA); Structural Engineers Association of California Opposition : None Known HISTORY SB 284 (Cannella) Page 12 of ? Source : American Council of Engineering Companies of California Related Pending Legislation : SB 177 (Wieckowski, 2015) would extend the sunset on the authorization for an LLC to be granted an alarm company operator's license, conditioned upon meeting certain insurance level requirements, to January 1, 2022. That bill is also scheduled to be heard in this Committee on April 28, 2015. Prior Legislation : AB 1608 (Olsen, Ch. 669, Stats. 2014), among other things, authorized the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services within the Department of Consumer Affairs to issue a private investigator's license to LLCs if, among other things, certain insurance requirements are met. The bill included a January 1, 2020, sunset date. SB 1077 (Price, Ch. 291, Stats. 2012), among other things, authorized LLCs to be issued alarm company operator licenses if certain liability insurance requirements are met. The bill included a January 1, 2016, sunset date. SB 560 (Gorell, Ch. 291, Stats. 2011) extended the sunset for architecture LLPs to January 1, 2019, under the continuation of the insurance levels required in AB 1596 (Shelley, Ch. 595, Stats. 2001). The bill, as introduced, proposed to remove the sunset entirely. SB 1008 (Padilla, Ch. 634, Stats. 2010) authorized licensed engineers and land surveyors to organize and operate as LLPs, as specified, and requires engineers and land surveyors organizing as LLPs to carry insurance liability coverage, as specified. This authorization is set to sunset on January 1, 2016. SB 392 (Florez, Ch. 698, Stats. 2009) authorized the State Contractors' License Board to issue to an LLC a license to provide contactor services, if the LLC met the liability coverage requirements provided in the bill (and met other licensing requirements). SB 1337 (Correa, 2008) was similar to SB 392, but lacked the insurance and/or escrow deposit requirements for the LLC and its members. The bill died in this Committee. SB 284 (Cannella) Page 13 of ? SB 1225 (Harmon, Ch. 114, Stats. 2008) permitted an LLC to obtain a license as a cemetery authority provided it conformed to the insurance requirements for professional LLPs and provided no licensee practicing his or her profession becomes an owner-member of the LLC. SB 414 (Corbett, Ch. 80, Stats. 2007) increased the liability coverage amounts for accountancy and law LLPs. AB 2914 (Leno, Ch. 426, Stats. 2006) extended the sunset date of architecture LLPs until January 1, 2012, and increased the amount of insurance that such LLPs must hold. AB 180 (Jerome Horton, 2005) was substantially similar to SB 1008 (Padilla, Ch. 634, Stats. 2010) in its provisions of the organization of engineers and land surveyors as LLPs, and contained a sunset date. That bill passed this Committee but was ultimately gutted and amended to deal with a different topic. AB 1265 (Benoit, 2003) would have permitted professional engineers and land surveyors to organize as an LLP and would have required that, depending on the number of partners, the LLP have between $500,000 and $5 million in insurance. This bill was held in this Committee. AB 1596 (Shelley, Ch. 595, Stats. 2001) extended the sunset date of statutes permitting architects to organize as LLPs, to January 1, 2007. AB 469 (Cardoza, Ch. 504, Stats. 1998) authorized architects to form a LLP provided the partnership had between $500,000 and $5 million in insurance depending on the number of partners in the LLP. Only partnerships with a net worth of $10 million or more were allowed to become LLPs. This bill included a January 1, 2002, sunset date. AB 2401 (Miller, 1996) would have allowed contractors to operate as LLCs. The bill died in this Committee. SB 141 (Beverly, Ch. 57, Stats. of 1995) would have added numerous categories of state regulated professional service providers to the types of businesses that could operate as LLCs. However, opponents of SB 141 and that bill's sponsor were unable to agree as to whether or not professional or licensed SB 284 (Cannella) Page 14 of ? LLC service providers should carry adequate insurance to ensure their financial ability to respond to legal judgments for contract or tort claims. Consequently, those additional classes of businesses were amended out of SB 141 prior to its enactment. SB 513 (Calderon, Ch. 679, Stats. 1995) authorized the establishment of LLPs for licensed attorneys and licensed accountants, as long as the LLP purchased a liability insurance policy or maintained bank deposits of least $100,000 per limited liability partner (or an aggregate of not less than $500,000 for fewer than five partners and not more than $5 million for all others). Only partnerships with a net worth of $10 million or more were allowed to become LLPs. SB 469 (Beverly and Killea, Ch. 1200, Stats. 1994) See Background. Prior Vote : Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee: (Ayes 9, Noes 0) **************