BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 286|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 286
          Author:   Hertzberg (D)
          Amended:  6/2/15  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE:  11-0, 4/21/15
           AYES:  Hueso, Fuller, Cannella, Hertzberg, Hill, Lara, Leyva,  
            McGuire, Morrell, Pavley, Wolk

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-1, 5/28/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva
           NOES:  Nielsen
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Mendoza 

           SUBJECT:   Electricity:  direct transactions


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:   This bill increases the statewide limit on Direct  
          Access (DA) service by 8,000 gigawatt hours to allow a greater  
          number of nonresidential customers of the electrical  
          investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to receive electric service from  
          an entity other than an IOU.  This bill also requires that all  
          additional DA service come from renewable resources.

          ANALYSIS: 

          Existing law:
          
          1)Suspends the ability of retail end-use customers of the IOUs  
            to receive electrical service from an entity other than an  








                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  2


            IOU.  This arrangement commonly is referred to as DA, while  
            "other providers of electrical service" are known as Electric  
            Service Providers (ESPs).  



          2)Makes an exception to this general DA suspension by directing  
            the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to allow  
            individual retail nonresidential end-use customers of the IOUs  
            to acquire electric service from ESPs in each electrical  
            corporation's distribution service territory, up to a maximum  
            allowable total annual limit.  Statute sets the annual limit  
            at the maximum total kilowatt hours (KWhs) supplied by all  
            ESPs to distribution customers of each electrical corporation  
            during any sequential 12-month period between April 1, 1998,  
            and October 11, 2009.

          3)Makes ESPs subject to the same requirements that are  
            applicable to the state's three largest IOUS for resource  
            adequacy, the renewables portfolio standard (RPS) and the  
            requirements for the electricity sector adopted by the  
            California Air Resources Board pursuant to the California  
            Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.  (Public Utilities Code  
            §356.1 et seq.)

          4)State's the intent of the Legislature to prevent any shifting  
            of recoverable costs between IOU customers.  (Public Utilities  
            Code §366.1(d)(1).)

          This bill:

          1)Increases the statewide limit on DA by 8,000 gigawatt hours.   
            This bill directs the CPUC, as of January 1, 2016, to adopt a  
            schedule that phases in new DA transactions for individual  
            retail nonresidential end-use customers over a period of not  
            more than three years.  This bill requires that 100 percent of  
            new DA transactions be for electricity products from renewable  
            energy resources eligible for RPS credit, pursuant to existing  
            statutory RPS procurement requirements, enforced by the CPUC.

          2)Requires each IOU to continue to provide DA customers with  
            support functions, including, but not limited to, billing,  
            customer service, call centers, support services, and line  
            clearance tree trimming, through its own employees, except  







                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  3


            that construction of distribution system equipment and line  
            clearance tree trimming may be performed pursuant to contracts  
            between the electrical corporation and another entity.  This  
            bill prohibits an ESP from offering consolidated billing.

          Background

          Direct Access.  DA allows customers of each IOU to elect to  
          receive electric service from a provider other than the IOU.   
          Such providers are knows as ESPs.  ESPs rely on the use of IOU  
          transmission lines to deliver electricity to DA customers.  DA  
          was first offered as part of efforts to restructure the  
          electricity markets to provide more competition.  In 2000 and  
          2001, the state experienced extraordinary wholesale electricity  
          prices in what has become known as the California electricity  
          crisis.  

          Direct Access Suspended.  In response to the electricity crisis,  
          state government suspended DA.  No new customers would be  
          allowed to sign DA contracts; existing DA contracts, however,  
          would continue in effect.   

          Direct Access Reopened.  In 2009, the Legislature passed SB 695  
          (Kehoe, Chapter 337, Statutes of 2009), which reopened DA, up to  
          a specified limit.  Consistent with statute, the CPUC determined  
          the additional amount of DA service that could occur in each IOU  
          territory, as shown in the following table.


               -------------------------------------------------- 
              |                                                  |
              |    SB 965 Direct Access Limits [CPUC Decision    |
              |                    10-03-22]                     |
              |                                                  |
               -------------------------------------------------- 
              |-----------------+--------+------+-------+-------|
              |                 |  PG&E  | SCE  | SDG&E | Total |
              |-----------------+--------+------+-------+-------|
              |     SB 695 Limit|   9,520|11,710|  3,562| 24,792|
              |                 |        |      |       |       |
              |                 |        |      |       |       |
              |-----------------+--------+------+-------+-------|
              |     Existing DA |   5,574| 7,764|  3,100| 16,438|
              |        Contracts|        |      |       |       |







                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  4


              |-----------------+--------+------+-------+-------|
              |New DA Allowance |   3,946| 3,946|    462|  8,354|
              |    (line 1 less |        |      |       |       |
              |          line 2)|        |      |       |       |
               ------------------------------------------------- 
               -------------------------------------------------- 
              |                                          |       |
              |1) Gigawatt hours.                        |       |
               -------------------------------------------------- 

          Nonresidential customers quickly enrolled in all available DA  
          service made newly available by SB 695.  Under current law, no  
          customer may newly contract with an ESP for DA service unless an  
          existing customer drops out of DA.

          Recent Amendments.  The Senate Appropriations Committee amended  
          this bill in two ways.  First, the Committee clarified that the  
          bill's 8,000 gigawatt hour increase in DA applies statewide.   
          This amendment is consistent with the intent of the Senate  
          Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee that considered  
          the bill prior to the Appropriations Committee. The  
          Appropriations Committee's second amendment to this bill  
          increases, from 51 percent to 100 percent, the proportion of DA  
          service made available by this bill that must come from  
          RPS-eligible renewable energy products.    
          



          Prior/Related Legislation
          
          SB 350 (De León, 2015) requires load-serving entities to procure  
          at least 50 percent of their electricity from renewable  
          resources by 2030.  The bill passed the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee on a vote of 5-1.

          SB 695 (Kehoe, Chapter 337, Statutes of 2009) directed the CPUC  
          to allow nonresidential end-use customers to acquire electric  
          service from ESPs in each IOU service territory, up to a  
          specified limit.  SB 695 set the limit for each IOU equal to the  
          maximum total KWhs supplied by all ESPs to DA customers of the  
          IOU during any sequential 12-month period between April 1, 1998,  
          and October 11, 2009 (the date the bill - and urgency measure -  
          took effect).







                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  5


          
          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, initial costs  
          of at least $400,000 annually for 1.5 years, then $250,000  
          annually ongoing, from the Public Utilities Reimbursement  
          Account (special) for increased oversight and management of a  
          larger DA service program.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified5/29/15)


          3Phases Renewables
          AES
          Albertsons/Safeway 
          Alliance for Retail Energy Markets
          Alta Dena Dairy, A Dean Foods Company
          Aviva Energy Corporation
          Bericap
          Boral Industries, Incorporated
          Building Owners and Managers Association
          California Association of Sanitation Agencies
          California Biomass Energy Alliance
          California Business Properties Association
          California Grocers Association
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          California Retailers Association
          California State Universities
          Calpine Corporation
          Cargill, Incorporated
          Cinemark USA, Incorporated
          Commerce Energy, Incorporated
          Community College League of California
          COMPETE Coalition
          Constellation NewEnergy, Incorporated
          Covanta Energy
          Direct Access Customer Coalition
          Direct Energy Business, LLC
          Dynegy, Incorporated
          eBay, Incorporated
          Ecom-Energy of California, Incorporated
          Energy Users Forum







                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  6


          Fabrica International, Incorporated
          Gas and Power Technologies, Incorporated
          Guardian Industries Corporation
          IBM Corporation
          IGS Energy
          JDS Uniphase
          Just Energy Group, Incorporated
          Kings Canyon Unified School District
          Large-Scale Solar Association
          Lehigh Hanson
          Liberty Power Corp., LLC
          Lineage Logistics
          Macy's, Incorporated
          Noble Americas Energy Solutions, LLC
          Nordic Energy Services, LLC
          Oakley, Incorporated
          Owen-Illinois
          Owens Corning
          Qualcomm
          Retail Energy Supply Association
          RockTenn Company
          School Project for Utility Rate Reduction
          Shell Energy North America (US), LP
          Solar City
          Solar Energy Industries Association
          Stanford University
          Staples
          Steelscape
          Swisstex California
          TechNet
          Tenaska, Incorporated
          TES Energy Services, LP
          Think Wire Energy Services, Incorporated
          Tiger Natural Gas
          United States Cold Storage, Incorporated
          University of California
          Walmart
          Western Power Trading Forum
          Western States Petroleum Association
          Wilmar Oils and Fats Stockton


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified5/29/15)








                                                                     SB 286  
                                                                    Page  7



          California State Association of Electrical Workers
          California State Pipe Trades Council
          Coalition of California Utility Workers
          Pacific Gas and Electric Company
          San Diego Gas & Electric Company
          Southern California Edison
          The Utility Reform Network
          Western States Council of Sheet Metal Workers


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     The author contends this bill  
          encourages competition and reduces prices for electricity.   
          This, in turn, will give California businesses the necessary  
          tools to make cost-effective energy decisions and make  
          California more business friendly, while providing new flexible  
          options for meeting the state's renewable energy and greenhouse  
          gas reduction goals.

          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:Opponents argue that ESPs rely on a  
          short-term business model that undercuts the long-term planning  
          needed to meet California's ambitious energy and environmental  
          goals, as well as to finance its capital-intensive energy  
          infrastructure.   The IOUs also argue that the migration of  
          customers to DA service saddles IOU ratepayers with millions in  
          stranded costs, despite the existence of a CPUC process to  
          allocate such costs.

          Prepared by:Jay Dickenson / E.U. & C. / (916) 651-4107
          6/3/15 9:45:39


                                   ****  END  ****