BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 292|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
VETO
Bill No: SB 292
Author: Pan (D)
Amended: 6/25/15
Vote: 21
SENATE PUBLIC EMP. & RET. COMMITTEE: 3-2, 4/27/15
AYES: Pan, Beall, Hall
NOES: Morrell, Fuller
SENATE FLOOR: 25-10, 5/4/15
AYES: Allen, Beall, Block, Cannella, De León, Galgiani, Hall,
Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno,
Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Roth,
Wieckowski, Wolk
NOES: Anderson, Bates, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Morrell,
Nielsen, Runner, Stone, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Berryhill, Hancock, Nguyen, Pavley
SENATE FLOOR: 27-12, 9/11/15
AYES: Allen, Beall, Block, Cannella, De León, Glazer, Hall,
Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,
Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning,
Pan, Pavley, Roth, Wieckowski, Wolk
NOES: Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach,
Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Runner, Stone, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Galgiani
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-25, 9/11/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Public employee retirement: contributions
SOURCE: California Professional Firefighters
Peace Officers Research Association of California
SB 292
Page 2
DIGEST: This bill specifies that the requirement prohibiting
employers from paying employee contributions for employees
subject to the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act
of 2013 (PEPRA), who are required to pay 50% of the actuarial
normal cost of their pension benefits, does not apply in
specific cities and one county in which voter-approved tax
levies were enacted prior to 1978 for the purpose of paying
pension costs. In those cities and one county, the employer is
not prohibited from paying the employee contribution. The
exemption provided by this bill applies to the requirement that
an employer may not pay the employee contribution. Thus, when
an employer pays its pension program costs with revenues derived
from a special tax rate approved by voters in support of pension
programs, the employer is not prohibited from making the
employee contribution. The bill also clarifies that the
employee is still subject to an employee contribution rate of
50% of the normal cost. Finally, the bill clarifies that the
exemption only applies with regard to contributions on behalf of
pension benefits covered by the pension levies. So in cases in
which the levies only cover certain personnel, such as safety
and fire personnel, the exemption is with regard to those
employees' benefits only.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1)Requires, under PEPRA, that new public employees hired after
January 1, 2013, shall pay at least 50% of the actuarial
normal cost of funding their pension benefits, as specified.
2)Sets other required employee contribution rates for non-PEPRA
(sometimes called classic or legacy members), and allows, in
the case of those members, the employer and employees to
collectively bargain over whether or not the employer pays
some or all of the member contributions.
3)Prohibits a public employer from paying any portion of an
employee's contribution when the employee is subject to PEPRA
and the 50% of normal cost contribution requirement.
4)Specifies, in PEPRA, that charter cities with independent
SB 292
Page 3
retirement systems that are not subject to state laws are
exempt from PEPRA.
5)Limits, under the state Constitution (Proposition 13, 1978)
property tax rates to 1% of the purchase price of the property
with specified adjustments.
6)Exempts from Proposition 13's 1% property rate limit a
property tax rate approved by voters prior to July 1, 1978,
for the purpose of paying the pension costs of the city or
county. Twenty-five cities and one county were thus
grandfathered under Proposition 13.
7)Prohibits the imposition of new extraordinary ad valorem
property tax rates for indebtedness at the local level other
than for general obligation bonds.
8)Freezes extraordinary tax rates for pensions approved by
voters before Proposition 13 at their 1982-83 percentages.
This bill exempts a public employer from the requirement under
PEPRA that prohibits the employer from making the mandated
PEPRA-employee contributions of at least 50% of the actuarial
normal costs of their pensions. This exemption only applies in
cases in which the city or county passed a voter-approved tax
levy prior to July 1, 1978, for the purpose of paying for the
costs of the city's or county's pension benefits, and it only
applies to the specific pension expenses covered by the special
tax levies. Therefore, if the special tax levy is for fire and
safety personnel only, the exemption would only apply with
regard to those employees' contributions.
In cases in which the employer is not prohibited from making the
employee contribution, the employee's contribution rate would
still be the statutory amount (e.g., 50% of the normal cost for
employees subject to PEPRA), and the employer and employee could
collectively bargain over whether or not the employer would pick
up the employee contributions in full or in part.
Background
Proposition 13 and Extraordinary Tax Rates for Pensions
SB 292
Page 4
Proposition 13 limited property taxes to 1% of the purchase
price of the property. However, the 1% limit on property tax
rates did not apply to special assessments used to pay for
indebtedness approved by voters before July 1, 1978. In 1982,
the Supreme Court ruled in Carman v. Alvord that extraordinary
tax rates approved by voters before July 1, 1978 to fund
employee pension systems are valid exemptions under Proposition
13. These levies vary by city, range from 0.05% to 0.45%, and
are levied in addition to the 1% general property tax rate.
In 1983, the Legislature enacted a moratorium on property tax
rates for indebtedness other than bonds (AB 377, Roos). This
moratorium was made permanent in 1985 (AB 13, Roos). AB 13 also
froze voter-approved extraordinary tax rates for pensions at
their 1982-83 percentage levels. The extraordinary rates are
frozen as a specific percentage of total tax revenues;
therefore, if total property values grow over time, the total
dollar amount of the extraordinary tax revenues increases in
tandem, even though the rate does not increase.
Cities and County with Extraordinary Tax Rates for Pensions
The cities and county with extraordinary tax rates for pensions
that are also subject to PEPRA are as follows:
Albany, Alameda, Bell, Berkeley, Cloverdale, Coalinga, Compton,
El Monte, Huntington Beach, Huntington Park, Inglewood, Lynwood,
Maywood, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Oakland, Oxnard,
Richmond, San Fernando, San Gabriel, Watsonville, and Santa
Clara County.
In some of the cities with extraordinary tax rates for pensions,
the pension costs covered are for the city's safety employees
only-primarily police and fire personnel. Other employers have
extraordinary tax rates for all pension costs. Both employer and
employee contributions have been allowed to be paid by proceeds
from the extraordinary tax levies, subject to local collective
bargaining.
Two cities-Los Angeles and Fresno-do not contract with CalPERS
and instead maintain their own independent retirement systems.
SB 292
Page 5
These cities are independent charter cities that maintain
independent retirement systems and are exempt from PEPRA. Thus,
they may continue paying their retirement obligations using
revenue generated by their respective levies, unlike the
ambiguity that has surfaced for those cities that contract with
CalPERS, which are subject to PEPRA.
Employee Contributions under PEPRA
PEPRA (AB 340, 2012) requires that new public employees in
California first hired after January 1, 2013 must pay 50% of the
actuarial normal costs of their pension plans as member
contributions to the retirement systems. For employees subject
to PEPRA, the employer is prohibited from paying the member
contributions. PEPRA employees hired prior to 2013 (referred to
as "classic" or "legacy" members of the retirement systems) pay
contribution rates at the statutory pre-PEPRA levels set for
those employees unless they have collectively bargained a
different contribution level with the employer.
PEPRA allowed a new employee to be grandfathered under the
classic or legacy employee contribution rate if the agency had a
collective bargaining agreement in place on January 1, 2013,
that set a specific contribution rate for employees. However,
PEPRA states that upon expiration of that bargaining agreement,
PEPRA employees must, at that time, begin paying the required
member contribution rate equal to 50% of the actuarial normal
cost of their respective plans.
Prior Legislation
AB 340 (Furutani, Chapter 296, Statutes of 2012) enacted PEPRA,
which became effective on January 1, 2013.
AB 13 (Roos, Chapter 112, Statutes of 1985) made the moratorium
on extraordinary tax rates for indebtedness other than bonds
enacted by AB 377 permanent and froze extraordinary tax rates
for pensions at their 1982-83 percentage levels.
AB 377 (Roos, Chapter 491, Statutes of 1983) created a temporary
moratorium on extraordinary tax rates for indebtedness other
SB 292
Page 6
than bonds.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:NoLocal: No
SUPPORT: (Verified10/21/15)
California Professional Firefighters (co-source)
Peace Officers Research Association of California (co-source)
Laborers' International Union of North America, Locals 777 & 792
Oxnard Firefighters Association, International Association of
Fire Firefighters Local 1684
Service Employees International Union
OPPOSITION: (Verified10/21/15)
City of Oxnard
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:
According to the Peace Officers Research Association of
California:
SB 292 clarifies an issue that came to PORAC's attention
after the passage of California's pension reform
legislation, the California Public Employees' Pension
Reform Act (PEPRA), took effect on January 1, 2013. A
section in the PEPRA calls for all new employees, and by
2018 most current employees, to contribute 50% of their
"normal cost." Normal cost is the basic cost of providing
an employee's future retirement benefit, not including
unfunded liabilities or surpluses. The issue that has come
to our attention centers around approximately two dozen
cities and one county whose voters approved a tax to fund
their local retirement obligations. Some of these pension
initiatives were approved by voters as early as the 1920's.
The pension levies pay for both the employer and employee
SB 292
Page 7
contributions out of their respective funds, thereby
allowing that city or county's general fund to be used in
other areas important to that jurisdiction.
If these local agencies are to subject to the PEPRA rule on
employee contributions, the impact will hit those agencies'
general fund and could potentially result in a serious loss
of employees due to the immediate increased cost. Also, it
will truly impact recruitment for those entities due to the
higher contribution rates that would be required from their
general fund.
The Governor's stated intent for the passage of PEPRA was
in large part to save employer cost for increasing pension
obligations. Unfortunately, the PEPRA section mandating
increased employee contributions will have the opposition
effect for these cities and county impacted by Senate Bill
292.
According to the California Professional Firefighters:
Since PEPRA, ambiguity now exists as to whether these
employers may use this voter-approved tax revenue to pay
all of their retirement obligations, including the employee
share. Consequently, these few jurisdictions are now
forced to backfill the cost of their retirement obligations
using other revenue sources. Additionally, the provisions
of PEPRA as currently interpreted, present a conflict with
the will of the voters in enacting these pension levies
many decades ago. Finally, this conflict presents a new,
unexpected strain on a local agency's general fund in
having to find other ways to meet its requirements, as
outlined in their various collective
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:The City of Oxnard notes that the
revenue received from its pension tax levy does not fully cover
its pension costs, and expresses concerns that this bill could
result in costs for employee contributions falling back onto the
city.
GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:
SB 292
Page 8
I am returning Senate Bill 292 without my signature.
This bill exempts certain employees from making pension
contributions if they work in a city or county that
receives parcel tax revenue designated for pension costs.
I believe the cost-sharing requirements in the Public
Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 are unrelated to
whether a city or county has an existing parcel tax for
pensions. The employee share-of-cost is a crucial standard
that must be retained. I am unwilling to chip away at this
reform.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-25, 9/11/15
AYES: Alejo, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon,
Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dodd,
Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto,
Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Roger Hernández,
Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Lopez, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin,
Nazarian, O'Donnell, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,
Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber,
Wood, Atkins
NOES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Brough, Chávez, Dahle,
Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Jones, Kim,
Lackey, Levine, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Obernolte, Olsen,
Patterson, Steinorth, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bigelow, Chang, Daly, Irwin, Linder,
Melendez, Williams
Prepared by:Pamela Schneider / P.E. & R. / (916) 651-1519
11/4/15 14:01:22
**** END ****
SB 292
Page 9