BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |SB 295 |Hearing |5/6/15 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |De León |Tax Levy: |Yes | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |2/23/15 |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Bouaziz | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- COLLEGE ACCESS TAX CREDIT FUND Extends the College Access Tax Credit Fund sunset date to January 1, 2018 and increases the credit percentage. Background and Existing Law State law allows taxpayers to receive an income or franchise tax credit for a specified percentage of cash contributions made to the College Access Tax Credit Fund (Fund). The yearly maximum allocation amount is $500 million plus any carryover of unused funds from the prior year. The specified percentage used to calculate the credit is: 60 percent of the amount contributed during the 2014 taxable year, 55 percent of the amount contributed during the 2015 taxable year, 50 percent of the amount contributed during the 2016 taxable year. The California Educational Facilities Authority is required to allocate and certify the income tax credit to personal and corporate taxpayers and provide the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) a SB 295 (De León) 2/23/15 Page 2 of ? copy of each credit certificate immediately following the year of issue. The cash contributions are used to find the Cal Grant B program. State law precludes any deductions for amounts taken into account in the calculation of the credit. Applications for the tax credit are processed on a first come, first served basis. There is no maximum contribution limit. The credit would be repealed by its own terms as of December 1, 2017. Proposed Law Senate Bill 295 extends the College Access Tax Credit Fund repeal date to December 1, 2018. SB 295 also increases the credit percentage amounts as follows: 60 percent of the amount contributed during the 2015 taxable year, 55 percent of the amount contributed during the 2016 taxable year, 50 percent of the amount contributed during the 2017 taxable year. State Revenue Impact FTB estimates that the credit will result in a revenue loss of $50 million in fiscal year 2015-16; $85 million in 2016-17 and $65 million in 2017-18. FTB notes that the estimate shows the impact on income and corporation tax collections. SB 295 requires funds to be transferred from the College Access Tax Credit Fund to the General Fund, to fully offset the tax credit's impact on the General Fund. SB 295 (De León) 2/23/15 Page 3 of ? Comments 1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, "This bill seeks to continue to increase Cal Grant B Access Award amounts for California's lowest income students, to improve academic achievement and graduation rates through $500 Million in available tax credits in the College Access Tax Credit Fund by leveraging federal tax deductions for charitable contributions. This tax credit has been fully vetted by a University of California Los Angeles report which concludes that the members of legislature are custodians of California's welfare, particularly in an era of state budgetary distress and should take advantage of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules and regulations to benefit the state. This tax credit differs from most others in that the state does not lose money to incentivize a behavior. Rather, the taxpayer makes a donation to the state and then a credit is given. For every dollar donated to the Fund in the first year, the individual taxpayer or the corporate donor would receive 60 cents back from the state and the Fund would receive 40 cents plus interest. The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) predicts that the College Access Tax Credit Fund would be fully subscribed due to the high incentive to taxpayers because according to IRS rules the taxpayer would also be able to take a donation deduction on their Federal Taxes. The taxpayer would get back on every dollar donated a total of 80 cents to over 95 cents depending on how they file. California is a so-called donor state, only receiving around 78-cents for every dollar state taxpayers send to Washington. It's time to leverage Federal dollars to help offset skyrocketing college tuition. For each of the three years of the program, the California Student Aid Commission (CSAC) would have on average an extra $300 Million, after the tax credits are paid to taxpayers, and after all administrative costs are paid for, to increase the underfunded Cal Grant B Access Awards for over 170,000 California students at our for profit and not-for-profit private institutions, and all three sectors of our public institutions. College graduates are a critical part of the engine that drives California's economy. They are the future innovators; educators, engineers, lawyers, scientists, doctors, architects, executives, and so on that help make California the 9th largest economy in the world. SB 295 (De León) 2/23/15 Page 4 of ? The taxpayers of California make a tremendous investment in its college graduates. There is not a single public college or university student, whether they are on direct financial aid or not, who doesn't have their education at least partially underwritten by the taxpayers of California. We must make sure that we are getting maximum benefit from that investment. When the Cal Grant B Access Award was first established in 1969, the amount granted per student for the year was $960 to pay for books, housing and transportation. 43 years later that amount has grown to only $1,473 for the year - not even close to keeping up with inflation-that figure should be $5,900. What results is that many students must work one or even two jobs to help pay the bills, which delays graduation and impacts the students' ability to maximize their learning experience. This not only shortchanges the students but it shortchanges the California taxpayers, who are investing in their education for much longer than the four years it should take students to complete their degree and start contributing to the economy as graduates." 2. Program to date. In 2014, the College Access Tax Credit Fund received a total of $6,199,289 in donations. The California Educational Facilities Authority allocated $3,719,573 in tax credits. While receiving over $6 million in donations will help many students fund the ever rising cost of college, the Fund's yearly maximum allocation amount is $500 million. The program may need more time to maximize incoming donations as the program becomes more established. 3. No double dipping. The credit does not allow any deductions for amounts taken into account in the calculation of the credit, but a deduction may be made on a taxpayer's federal return. For example, Jane Doe contributes $10,000 to the Fund, thus she is entitled to a $6,000 credit (60% ? $10,000). Jane may claim a $6,000 credit on her California tax return. She can also claim a $10,000 charitable contribution on her federal return. However, she will not be able to claim a charitable contribution on her California return. 4. The research is in . Phillip Blackman (associate director of development at the Penn State Dickinson School of Law) and Kirk Stark (Professor and Vice Dean at the UCLA School of Law) wrote a report "Capturing Federal Dollars with State Charitable Tax SB 295 (De León) 2/23/15 Page 5 of ? Credits" where they outline the extensive benefits of this type of credit, with very little cost to the state. They use their research to show a significant benefit to an AMT taxpayer; specifically, An AMT taxpayer making a $100,000 donation to the CATCF special fund has a net out-of-pocket cost of only $12,000-that is, $100,000 minus $28,000 (in federal tax savings) minus $60,000 (in state tax savings). Clearly, the tax savings for that type of donation are far more than the tax savings normally arising from charitable gifts. AMT payers willing to make a gross gift of $1 to Cal Grants will be reimbursed a total of $0.88, consisting of $0.60 from the state of California and $0.28 from the federal governments. As structured, S.B. 798 is a powerful ''matching grant'' program that if enacted is likely to generate significant new funds for the Cal Grants program. Indeed, the matching rates are so generous that it is also likely to draw charitable dollars away from other worthy causes. Even so, it is worth noting that the program could be made even more attractive to potential donors. The most obvious way to do that would be to increase the credit percentage. Any credit percentage greater than 72 percent would ensure that donors experience no out-of-pocket costs for their donations. In states with charitable tax credit programs already in place, tax planners are beginning to catch on. One website describing Arizona's tax credit for school tuition organizations notes that if you are subject to the AMT, the tax benefits received exceed the out-of-pocket cost. The report considers that this "may be too good to be true," but for the recent IRS ruling, and considers this tax credit a way to increase federal funds that does not rely on Congressional actions. Mr. Blackman and Professor Stark go even farther, suggesting that the credit would be more lucrative if it were transferable or allowed against sales taxes. 5. Redirection or new money ? This bill encourages giving to the state's Cal Grant program through a 60%, 55%, and 50% credit against contributions, the most generous tax credit the state has ever allowed. Such a credit is sure to entice taxpayers to SB 295 (De León) 2/23/15 Page 6 of ? contribute but the credit may be so great that it redirects contributions from charities that currently receive them to this program. Instead of making a donation to UCLA, for example, a taxpayer may choose to use this tax credit instead therefore creating a greater need for a public university which is at partially funded by the general fund. Will this result in new revenue or simply redirect charitable funds from some charities to Cal Grants? The study's authors (comment 3) believe that donations to schools are largely from alumni and that these dollars will remain intact. Support and Opposition (4/30/15) Support : Unknown. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --