BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 295| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 295 Author: De León (D) Introduced:2/23/15 Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/6/15 AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/18/15 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen SUBJECT: College Access Tax Credit Fund SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill extends the College Access Tax Credit Fund sunset date to January 1, 2018, and increases the credit percentage. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Allows taxpayers to receive an income or franchise tax credit for a specified percentage of cash contributions made to the College Access Tax Credit Fund (Fund). SB 295 Page 2 2)Provides that the yearly maximum allocation amount is $500 million plus any carryover of unused funds from the prior year. 3)Specifies the percentages used to calculate the credit as follows: 60% of the amount contributed during the 2014 taxable year, 55% of the amount contributed during the 2015 taxable year, 50% of the amount contributed during the 2016 taxable year. 1)Requires the California Educational Facilities Authority to allocate and certify the income tax credit to personal and corporate taxpayers and provide the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) a copy of each credit certificate immediately following the year of issue. The cash contributions are used to fund the Cal Grant B program. This bill: 1)Extends Fund repeal date to December 1, 2018. 2)Increases the credit percentage amounts as follows: 60% of the amount contributed during the 2015 taxable year, 55% of the amount contributed during the 2016 taxable year, 50% of the amount contributed during the 2017 taxable year. Comments SB 295 Page 3 1)Program to date. In 2014, the Fund received a total of $6,199,289 in donations. The California Educational Facilities Authority allocated $3,719,573 in tax credits. While receiving over $6 million in donations will help many students fund the ever rising cost of college, the Fund's yearly maximum allocation amount is $500 million. The program may need more time to maximize incoming donations as the program becomes more established. 2)No double dipping. The credit does not allow any deductions for amounts taken into account in the calculation of the credit, but a deduction may be made on a taxpayer's federal return. For example, Jane Doe contributes $10,000 to the Fund, thus she is entitled to a $6,000 credit (60% ? $10,000). Jane may claim a $6,000 credit on her California tax return. She can also claim a $10,000 charitable contribution on her federal return. However, she will not be able to claim a charitable contribution on her California return. 3)The research is in. Phillip Blackman (associate director of development at the Penn State Dickinson School of Law) and Kirk Stark (Professor and Vice Dean at the UCLA School of Law) wrote a report "Capturing Federal Dollars with State Charitable Tax Credits" where they outline the extensive benefits of this type of credit, with very little cost to the state. They use their research to show a significant benefit to a federal Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayer; specifically: An AMT taxpayer making a $100,000 donation to the CATCF [College Access Tax Credit Fund] special fund has a net out-of-pocket cost of only $12,000-that is, $100,000 minus $28,000 (in federal tax savings) minus $60,000 (in state tax savings). Clearly, the tax savings for that type of donation are far more than the tax savings normally arising from charitable gifts. AMT payers willing to make a gross gift of $1 to Cal Grants will be reimbursed a total of $0.88, consisting of $0.60 from the state of California and $0.28 from the federal governments. As structured, S.B. 798 is a powerful ''matching grant'' program that if SB 295 Page 4 enacted is likely to generate significant new funds for the Cal Grants program. Indeed, the matching rates are so generous that it is also likely to draw charitable dollars away from other worthy causes. Even so, it is worth noting that the program could be made even more attractive to potential donors. The most obvious way to do that would be to increase the credit percentage. Any credit percentage greater than 72 percent would ensure that donors experience no out-of-pocket costs for their donations. In states with charitable tax credit programs already in place, tax planners are beginning to catch on. One website describing Arizona's tax credit for school tuition organizations notes that if you are subject to the AMT, the tax benefits received exceed the out-of-pocket cost. The report considers that this "may be too good to be true," but for the recent IRS ruling, and considers this tax credit a way to increase federal funds that does not rely on Congressional actions. Mr. Blackman and Professor Stark go even farther, suggesting that the credit would be more lucrative if it were transferable or allowed against sales taxes. 4)Redirection or new money? This bill encourages giving to the state's Cal Grant program through a 60%, 55%, and 50% credit against contributions, the most generous tax credit the state has ever allowed. Such a credit is sure to entice taxpayers to contribute but the credit may be so great that it redirects contributions from charities that currently receive them to this program. Instead of making a donation to UCLA, for example, a taxpayer may choose to use this tax credit instead therefore creating a greater need for a public university which is at partially funded by the general fund. Will this result in new revenue or simply redirect charitable funds from some charities to Cal Grants? The study's authors (Comment #3) believe that donations to schools are largely from alumni and that these dollars will remain intact. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No SB 295 Page 5 According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, FTB estimates that this bill will result in an annual revenue loss of $50 million in 2015-16, $85 million in 2016-17, and $65 million in 2017-18. This bill requires funds to be transferred from the Fund to the General Fund such that the net impact of College Access Tax Credits on the General Fund would be zero. Administrative expenses of all affected state entities would be backfilled by the Fund. SUPPORT: (Verified5/20/15) The Institute for College Access & Success OPPOSITION: (Verified5/20/15) None received Prepared by:Myriam Bouaziz / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119 5/21/15 10:15:37 **** END ****