SB 302, as amended, Lara. Claims against the state: appropriation.
Existing law requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.
This bill wouldbegin delete state that it appropriates an unspecified amount from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay an undesignated judgment.end deletebegin insert appropriate $141,250 from the Athletic Commission Fund and $24,140,683.50 from the General Fund to pay specified judgments.end insert
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3.
Appropriation: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The sum of ____ ($____) is hereby appropriated
2from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay for the
3judgment in the case of ____.
4Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually
5required for the payment of this judgment shall revert to the
P2 1General Fund on June 30 of the fiscal year in which the final
2payment is made.
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertOne hundred forty-one thousand two hundred
4fifty dollars ($141,250) is hereby appropriated from the Athletic
5Commission Fund to be allocated in accordance with the following
6schedule:end insert
7(1) Seventy-one thousand two hundred and fifty dollars
8($71,250) to the Department of Consumer Affairs to pay the
9settlement in Sarah Waklee v. California State Athletic
10Commission, Department of Consumer Affairs (Sacramento County
11
Superior Court, Case No. 2012-00135227). Any funds appropriated
12in excess of the amounts required for payment of this claim shall
13revert to the Athletic Commission Fund.
14(2) Seventy thousand dollars ($70,000) to pay the settlement in
15Dwayne Woodard v. California State Athletic Commission,
16Department of Consumer Affairs (Los Angeles County Superior
17Court, Case No. BC487180). Any funds appropriated in excess of
18the amounts required for the payment of this claim shall revert to
19the Athletic Commission Fund.
20(b) Twenty-five million one hundred forty thousand six hundred
21eighty-three dollars and fifty cents ($25,140,683.50) is hereby
22appropriated from the General Fund to be allocated in accordance
23with the following schedule:
24(1) The sum of twenty-four million dollars ($24,000,000) to the
25Department of General Services to pay the settlement in California
26First, LP v. California Department of General Services, et al. (San
27Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC10-505436). Any
28funds appropriated in excess of the amount required for the
29payment of this claim shall revert to the General Fund.
30(2) The sum of one hundred six thousand one hundred
31seventy-three dollars and fifty cents ($106,173.50) to the Fair
32Political Practices Commission to pay the settlement in Charles
33R. “Chuck” Reed, et al. v. Fair Political Practices Commission
34(Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-80001709).
35Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts required for the
36payment of this claim shall revert to the General Fund.
37(3) The sum of one million thirty-four thousand five hundred
38ten dollars
($1,034,510) to the Department of Justice to pay the
39settlement in Kevin Marilley, et al. v. California Department of
40Fish and Wildlife (United State District Court, Northern District
P3 1of California, Case No. 11-cv-2418). Any funds appropriated in
2excess of the amounts required for the payment of this claim shall
3revert to the General Fund.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
5immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
6the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
7immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
8In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state
9and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary
10for this act to take effect immediately.
O
98