SB 302, as amended, Lara. Claims against the state: appropriation.
Existing law requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.
This bill would appropriate $141,250 from the Athletic Commission Fund andbegin delete $24,140,683.50end deletebegin insert $24,106,173.50end insert from the General Fund to pay specified judgments.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) One hundred forty-one thousand two hundred
2fifty dollars ($141,250) is hereby appropriated from the Athletic
3Commission Fund to be allocated in accordance with the following
4schedule:
5(1) Seventy-one thousand two hundredbegin delete andend delete fifty dollars
6($71,250) to the Department of Consumer Affairs to pay the
P2 1settlement in Sarah Waklee v. California State Athletic
2Commission, Department of Consumer Affairs (Sacramento
3County
Superior Court, Case No. 2012-00135227). Any funds
4appropriated in excess of the amounts required for payment of this
5claim shall revert to the Athletic Commission Fund.
6(2) Seventy thousand dollars ($70,000)begin insert to the Department of
7Consumer Affairsend insert to pay the settlement in Dwayne Woodard v.
8California State Athletic Commission, Department of Consumer
9Affairs (Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC487180).
10Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts required for the
11payment of this claim shall revert to the Athletic Commission
12Fund.
13(b) begin deleteTwenty-five million one hundred forty thousand six hundred begin insert
Twenty-four
14eighty-three dollars and fifty cents ($25,140,683.50)end delete
15million one hundred six thousand one hundred seventyend insertbegin insert-three
16dollars and fifty cents ($24,106,173.50)end insert is hereby appropriated
17from the General Fund to be allocated in accordance with the
18following schedule:
19(1) The sum of twenty-four million dollars ($24,000,000) to the
20Department of General Services to pay the settlement in California
21First, LP v. California Department of General Services, et al. (San
22Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC10-505436). Any
23funds appropriated in excess of the amount required for the
24payment of this claim shall revert to the General Fund.
25(2) The sum of one hundred six thousand one hundred
26seventy-three dollars
and fifty cents ($106,173.50) to the Fair
27Political Practices Commission to pay the settlement in Charles
28R. “Chuck” Reed, et al. v. Fair Political Practices Commission
29(Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-80001709).
30Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts required for the
31payment of this claim shall revert to the General Fund.
32(3) The sum of one million thirty-four thousand five hundred
33ten dollars
($1,034,510) to the Department of Justice to pay the
34settlement in Kevin Marilley, et al. v. California Department of
35Fish and Wildlife (United State District Court, Northern District
36of California, Case No. 11-cv-2418). Any funds appropriated in
37excess of the amounts required for the payment of this claim shall
38revert to the General Fund.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
40immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
P3 1the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
2immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
3In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state
4and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary
5for this act to take effect immediately.
O
97