SB 313, as amended, Galgiani. Local government: zoning ordinances: school districts.
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district, by a 2⁄3 vote of its members, to render a city or county zoning ordinance inapplicable to a proposed use of school district property, except when the proposed use is for nonclassroom facilities.
This bill would additionally condition this authorization upon compliance with a notice requirement regarding a schoolsite on agricultural land, and would require the governing board to notify the city or county, in writing, of the reason the governing board intends to take that vote at leastbegin delete 90end deletebegin insert 30end insert
days prior to the vote. The bill would also require that vote to be based upon written findingsbegin delete on the record that contain substantial evidenceend delete that a zoning ordinance fails to accommodate the need to renovate and expand an existing public school or locate a new public school within the city or county.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 53094 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this article,
4this article does not require a school district to comply with the
5zoning ordinances of a county or city unless the zoning ordinance
6makes provision for the location of public schools and unless the
7city or county has adopted a general plan.
8(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the governing board of a
9school district, that has complied with the requirements of Section
1065352.2, Section 21151.2 of the Public Resources Code, and
11Section 17215.5 of the Education Code, by a vote of two-thirds of
12its members taken at leastbegin delete 90end deletebegin insert
30end insert days after the governing board
13has notified the city or county, in writing, of the reason the
14governing board intends to take action pursuant to this subdivision,
15and based upon written findingsbegin delete on the record that contain that a zoning ordinance fails to accommodate
16substantial evidenceend delete
17the need to renovate and expand an existing public school or locate
18a new public school within the city or county, may render a city
19or county general plan or zoning ordinance inapplicable to a
20proposed use of property by the school district. The governing
21board of the school district may not take this action when the
22proposed use of the property by the school district is for
23nonclassroom facilities, including, but not limited to, warehouses,
24administrative buildings, and automotive storage and
repair
25buildings.
26(c) The governing board of the school district shall, within 10
27days of its vote, notify the city or county concerned of any action
28taken pursuant to subdivision (b). If the governing board has taken
29such an action, the city or county may commence an action in the
30superior court of the county whose zoning ordinance is involved
31or in which is situated the city whose zoning ordinance is involved,
32seeking a review of the action of the governing board of the school
33
district to determine whether it was arbitrary and capriciousbegin delete based pursuant to Section
34upon substantial evidence in the public recordend delete
351094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The city or county shall
36cause a copy of the complaint to be served on the board. If the
37court determines that the action was arbitrary and capricious, it
38shall declare it to be of no force and effect, and the zoning
P3 1ordinance in question shall be applicable to the use of the property
2by the school district.
O
97