BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 347 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 19, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair SB 347 (Jackson) - As Amended July 8, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Public Safety |Vote:|5 - 2 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill adds specified offenses to the list of misdemeanors that result in the defendant being prohibited from possessing a firearm for ten years; a violation of this prohibition is an SB 347 Page 2 alternate felony/misdemeanor and/or a fine of up to $1,000. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Annual ongoing costs of over $220,000 (Dealer's Record of Sale Fund) to the Department of Justice to address the additional workload and enhance the Consolidated Firearms Information System and the Automated Firearms System. 2)Unknown nonreimbursable local law enforcement and incarceration costs offset to a degree by increased fine revenue. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, "Firearms laws are a critical component of the state's responsibility to ensure public safety. According to FBI statistics, in 2013 there were a total of 1,745 murders in California and 1,224 of those were firearm related. In order to prevent gun violence we have adopted policies to prohibit the purchase of guns by persons believed to be high-risk for future criminal activity." "Still, many individuals with a history of criminal activity legally purchase firearms every year. It is well established that persons with a history of even a single prior arrest are, as a group, substantially more likely than persons with no such history to engage in criminal behavior in the future. In fact, studies have shown that handgun purchasers who have had a single prior conviction for a nonviolent firearm-related offense are 7 times as likely to be charge with new nonviolent firearm offenses, 4 times as likely to be charged with new violent offenses, and 5 times as likely to be charged with SB 347 Page 3 murder, rape, robbery, or aggravated assault than a person with no prior convictions." "These studies demonstrate the need to strengthen our firearms regulations. In particular, certain firearm-related misdemeanors that should have been originally included in the 10-year ban on firearm purchases. It is vital that we protect our communities by reducing unnecessary gun violence." 2)Background. Current state and federal laws prohibit persons who have been convicted of specific crimes from owning or possessing firearms. For example, anyone convicted of any felony offense is prohibited for life from firearms ownership under both federal and state law. California goes further and imposes a 10-year firearms prohibition on persons convicted of numerous misdemeanor offenses that involve either violence or the threat of violence. Additionally, anyone who has been found to be a danger to themselves or others due to mental illness is subject to a five-year prohibition, and people under domestic violence restraining orders are subject to a prohibition for the duration of that court order. 3)Argument in Support: According to the California Chapters of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, "Public safety would be furthered by the addition of the temporary firearm prohibitions under SB 347 as research shows that handgun purchasers with prior misdemeanor convictions are at increased risk of future criminal activity, including violent crimes. Specifically, a person in California convicted of one nonviolent firearm offense is over 7 times more likely to commit another nonviolent firearm offense, over 4 times more likely to commit a violent offense, and over five times more likely to commit a Violent Crime Index Offense (murder or non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, or SB 347 Page 4 aggravated assault). A temporary firearm prohibition for these at risk individuals would make them unable to pass a background check when attempting to purchase a firearm and place them in the Armed and Prohibited Persons System if they already possess a gun." 4)Argument in Opposition: According to the Shasta County Sheriff, "The addition of these misdemeanor offenses to the prohibited category that include the 'transfer' of firearms or ammunition could entrap family members that are giving firearms to relatives and are unaware of the requirements for firearms transfers through licensed dealers. The addition of the 'giving possession' of ammunition to 'minors' to the prohibited category could criminalize the simple act of a family member providing ammunition to other family members that are hunting or recreationally shooting." "There are provisions of SB 347 that add to the list of prohibiting misdemeanors carrying a 'loaded' and 'concealed' firearm as defined in PC 25400 and 25400(c)(6). This will lead to the prosecution of a person that makes the simple mistake of not locking or securing a handgun when they are transporting it in a vehicle." 5)Prior Legislation: SB 755 (Wolk), of the 2013-2014 legislative session, added specified offenses to the list of misdemeanors that result in a 10-year prohibition on firearms possession, and adds certain misdemeanors related to substance abuse for which a violation of two or more within a three-year period would have resulted in a 10-year prohibition on firearms possession. SB 755 was vetoed by the governor. Analysis Prepared by:Pedro R. Reyes / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 SB 347 Page 5